6-1 Journal: Evaluating A Program
Listen
ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
Focus
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
Turnitin™ enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Instructions
This journal will provide you with an opportunity to share your progress and get feedback regarding the program evaluation you will be completing in Milestone Three, due in Module Seven.
For more information, review the Module Six Journal Guidelines and Rubric PDF document.
Feel free to ask your instructor any other questions you may have regarding the requirements outlined in the Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric PDF document. Be sure to incorporate instructor feedback into your Milestone Three submission.
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Module Six Journal Guidelines and Rubric
Print Rubric
Criteria
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Critical Thinking and Reflection
25 points
Entry supports claims with relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process
21.25 points
Entry supports claims with mostly relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process
13.75 points
Entry supports claims with somewhat relevant personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process
0 points
Entry does not support claims with reflection on relevant personal examples
Score of Critical Thinking and Reflection,/ 25
Integration and Application
25 points
Entry shows excellent depth of knowledge of preparation needed for the policy or program evaluation and addresses the student’s policy or program directly
21.25 points
Entry shows good depth of knowledge of preparation needed for the policy or program evaluation and addresses the student’s policy or program directly
13.75 points
Entry shows limited depth of knowledge, indicating the student may have prepared but needs to research further
0 points
Entry does not address the prompt and reflects that the student is not prepared for the policy or program evaluation
Score of Integration and Application,/ 25
Voice
25 points
Entry is written in a style that is appealing and appropriate for the intended audience, and a consistent voice is evident throughout
21.25 points
Entry is written in a style that is generally appropriate for the intended audience, and an attempt is made to use a consistent voice
13.75 points
Entry is written in a style that considers the audience, but the author’s voice is not consistent and is difficult to identify
0 points
Entry does not attempt to use a style that considers the audience, and there is no evidence of author voice
Score of Voice,/ 25
Writing
25 points
Entry is free of errors in organization and grammar
21.25 points
Entry is mostly free of errors of organization and grammar; errors are marginal and rarely interrupt the flow
13.75 points
Entry contains errors of organization and grammar, but errors are limited enough so that entry can be understood
0 points
Entry contains errors of organization and grammar, making the entry difficult to understand
Score of Writing,/ 25
Total
Score of Module Six Journal Guidelines and Rubric,/ 100
Overall Score
Exemplary
86 points minimum
The overall submission earned 86 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Proficient
56 points minimum
The overall submission earned 56 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Needs Improvement
1 point minimum
The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Not Evident
0 points minimum
The overall submission earned 0 points. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Leave a Reply