Submit 1 Mini-SOAP note on a patient that you saw in clinic this week. Submit as

Submit 1 Mini-SOAP note on a patient that you saw in clinic this week. Submit as a Word Document. See example template below for required format. Review the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded. Demographic Data Patient initial (one initial only), age, and gender must be Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPPA) compliant. Subjective Chief Complaint (CC) History of Present Illness (HPI) (symptoms) in paragraph format Past Medical History (PMH): Current problem-focused and document pertinent information only. Current Medications: Medication Allergies: Social History: For current problem-focused and document only pertinent information only. Family History: For current problem-focused and document only pertinent information only. Review of Systems (ROS) as appropriate: Objective Vital signs Mental Status Exam Physical findings listed by body systems, not paragraph form. Patient Health Questionnaires, Screenings, and the results (PHQ-9, GAD 7, suicidal) Assessment (Diagnosis/ICD10 Code) Include all diagnoses that apply to this visit. Include one differential diagnosis. Plan Dx Plan (lab, x-ray) Tx Plan: (meds) Pt. Education, including specific medication teaching points.    Safety Plan        Referral/Follow-up *Based on population focus, some additional details may be required by faculty Top of Form Rubric
Mini SOAP Note
Mini SOAP Note
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSubjective
15 to >12.0 ptsAccomplished
SOAP format is well organized, with C/C, History of present Illness, past medical history, Medications, Allergies, Social Hx, family history, and other pertinent past and current diagnostic details. SOAP Note is complete, concise, and relevant with no extraneous data
12 to >10.0 ptsSatisfactory
SOAP format is well organized, with C/C, History of present Illness, past medical history, Medications, Allergies, Social Hx, Family history, and other pertinent past and current diagnostic details. Some extraneous data is present, with one minor data point missing.
10 to >5.0 ptsNeeds Improvement
SOAP format analysis is not well organized or presented in a varied format. Required data is missing. Too much extraneous data is present, or 2-3 data points are missing
5 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Symptom analysis is inadequate and is not organized. Objective or other data is mixed into the subjective data. Critical data is missing
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeObjective
15 to >12.0 ptsAccomplished
The Mental Status Exam is complete, concise, well-organized, and well-written. Includes pertinent psychiatric information. Organized by MSE list format. No extraneous information is included.
12 to >10.0 ptsSatisfactory
The Mental Status Exam is partially incomplete, organized, and satisfactorily written. Includes pertinent psychiatric information with additional extraneous details included. Somewhat organized in MSE list format.
10 to >5.0 ptsNeeds Improvement
The Mental Status Exam is incomplete and loosely organized, with improvements required. Therefore, relevant psychiatric information is omitted.
5 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Mental Status Exam is absent, disorganized in presentation, adheres to no specific format, or grossly omits relevant or pertinent psychiatric information.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment
15 to >12.0 ptsAccomplished
Diagnosis and Differential Dx are correct with DSM-5 code(s) and supported by subjective and objective data. Includes: 1 working Dx and 1 Differential Dx.
12 to >10.0 ptsSatisfactory
Diagnosis and Differential Dx are correct with DSM-5 code(s) and supported mainly by subjective and objective data. One pertinent differential diagnosis is not listed according to subjective and objective data. However, the working diagnosis is correct.
10 to >5.0 ptsNeeds Improvement
Diagnosis and Differential Dx are correct with DSM-5 code(s) and supported mainly by subjective and objective data. Missing pertinent differential diagnoses based on subjective and objective data presented. Or differential diagnoses are adequate with an incorrect working diagnosis.
5 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
All diagnoses (working and differential diagnoses) are incorrect or missing based on the subjective and objective data presented
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan
15 to >12.0 ptsAccomplished
The plan is well-organized, complete, evidence-based, and patient-centric. It comprehensively addresses the diagnosis and is individualized to the specific patient. *Plan requirements: prescribed medications, if any; explanation of off-label medication use, if prescribed; risks and benefits of medicines identified; therapy recommendations; patient education; referral/follow-up; and health maintenance.
12 to >10.0 ptsSatisfactory
The plan is organized, complete, evidence-based, and patient-centric. It comprehensively addresses the diagnosis and is individualized to the specific patient. The plan is missing one of the required items.
10 to >5.0 ptsNeeds Improvement
The plan is less organized and is not based on evidence. Fails to address each diagnosis sufficiently or is not individualized or patient-centric The plan is missing two or more of the required items.
5 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory
The plan is disorganized, absent, or missing all the required items.
15 pts
Total Points: 60