What information is reported in the abstract?

Critical Thinking Assignment: Analyze a Research Paper Read the following article: Basri, R., Issrani, R., Hua Gan, S., Prabhu, N., & Khursheed Alam, M. (2021). Burden of stroke in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A soaring epidemic. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 29(3), 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.02.002 Watch the following video: Steve Kirk (2020, May 3). The Structure of Scientific Research Papers YouTube. https://youtu.be/BAS9I4tFgV8 Write a paper that addresses each of the following: What information is reported in the abstract? What theoretical foundation was identified in the research? What is the motivation and scope of the study? Explain the research methods used. What gaps and implications did the researchers identify? What do the researchers include in the conclusions? How do the researchers indicate they have acted appropriately while conducting the study? Explain the research process and its importance in furthering knowledge in the field of healthcare.
HOW TO ANSWER
What information is reported in the abstract?
The abstract of the research paper “Burden of stroke in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A soaring epidemic” by Basri et al. (2021) provides a brief summary of the study, including its motivation, methods, findings, and conclusions.
The abstract begins by stating that stroke is a major health problem in Saudi Arabia, and that its burden is increasing. The authors then note that there is a paucity of data on the epidemiology of stroke in the country.
The motivation for the study was to provide an up-to-date overview of the burden of stroke in Saudi Arabia. The authors used a variety of methods to collect data, including a review of the literature, analysis of hospital records, and a nationwide survey.
The study found that stroke is a major cause of death and disability in Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of stroke is high, and the incidence is increasing. The risk factors for stroke in Saudi Arabia are similar to those in other countries, including hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia.
The authors conclude that stroke is a major public health problem in Saudi Arabia. They call for further research on the epidemiology of stroke in the country, as well as for the development and implementation of effective prevention and treatment strategies.
What theoretical foundation was identified in the research?
The research paper is based on the theoretical foundation of social determinants of health. This theory posits that the social and economic conditions in which people live have a significant impact on their health.
The authors argue that the high burden of stroke in Saudi Arabia is due to a number of social determinants of health, including:
Rapid urbanization: Saudi Arabia has experienced rapid urbanization in recent decades. This has led to changes in lifestyle and diet, which have increased the risk of stroke.
High prevalence of chronic diseases: Chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia are highly prevalent in Saudi Arabia. These diseases are major risk factors for stroke.
Inequities in healthcare access: There are inequities in healthcare access in Saudi Arabia. This means that some people have better access to healthcare than others. This can lead to delays in diagnosis and treatment of stroke, which can worsen the outcome.
What is the motivation and scope of the study?
The motivation for the study was to provide an up-to-date overview of the burden of stroke in Saudi Arabia. The authors note that there is a paucity of data on the epidemiology of stroke in the country. This data is essential for developing and implementing effective prevention and treatment strategies.
The scope of the study is broad. The authors used a variety of methods to collect data on the prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of stroke in Saudi Arabia. They also examined the social determinants of health that contribute to the high burden of stroke in the country.
Explain the research methods used.
The authors used a variety of research methods to collect data, including:
Literature review: The authors conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on stroke in Saudi Arabia. This helped them to identify the major gaps in the knowledge base.
Analysis of hospital records: The authors analyzed hospital records to obtain data on the prevalence, incidence, and outcomes of stroke in Saudi Arabia.
Nationwide survey: The authors conducted a nationwide survey to collect data on the risk factors for stroke.
What gaps and implications did the researchers identify?
The researchers identified a number of gaps in the knowledge base on stroke in Saudi Arabia. These gaps include:
Limited data on the epidemiology of stroke: The researchers found that there is limited data on the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for stroke in Saudi Arabia. This data is essential for developing and implementing effective prevention and treatment strategies.
Need for research on the social determinants of health: The researchers found that there is a need for more research on the social determinants of health that contribute to the high burden of stroke in Saudi Arabia. This research could help to identify interventions to reduce the burden of stroke in the country.
The implications of the research are significant. The findings suggest that stroke is a major public health problem in Saudi Arabia. The government needs to invest in research on stroke and develop and implement effective prevention and treatment strategies.
What do the researchers include in the conclusions?
The researchers conclude that stroke is a major public health problem in Saudi Arabia. They call for further research on the epidemiology of stroke in the country, as well as for the development and implementation of effective prevention and treatment strategies.
The researchers also emphasize the importance of addressing the social determinants of health that contribute to the high burden of stroke in Saudi Arabia. This could include interventions to improve access to
1.Abstract:
Summarize the key information presented in the abstract of the research paper. Abstracts typically provide an overview of the study’s objectives, methods, results, and conclusions.
2. Theoretical Foundation:
Identify and discuss any theoretical foundations or frameworks mentioned in the paper. Researchers often draw upon existing theories or models to guide their study.
3. Motivation and Scope:
Explain the motivation behind the study. What problem or issue does it aim to address? What is the scope of the research? Does the paper mention any specific goals or objectives?
4. Research Methods:
Describe the research methods used in the study. This includes the study design (e.g., observational, experimental), data collection methods, sample size, and statistical analysis techniques.
5. Gaps and Implications:
Discuss any gaps or limitations identified by the researchers in their study. Are there areas where further research is needed? What are the implications of their findings for healthcare or related fields?
6. Conclusions:
Summarize the conclusions drawn by the researchers based on their study’s results. What key findings are highlighted in the paper?
7. Ethical Considerations:
Examine how the researchers indicate they have acted ethically while conducting the study. This may include discussions of informed consent, data privacy, and ethical approval.
8. Research Process and Importance:
Explain the research process followed by the authors and its importance in furthering knowledge in the field of healthcare. How does their study contribute to the existing body of research, and what potential implications or applications does it have?
To analyze the research paper effectively, you will need to read the paper in detail, paying close attention to the sections mentioned above. Each of these elements contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the research, its context, and its significance in the field. Be sure to provide specific examples and quotes from the paper to support your analysis.