Assessment Descriiption
In this assignment, students will pull together the capstone project change proposal components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. For this project, the student will apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.
Develop a written project that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:
1. Background
2. Clinical problem statement.
3. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system.
4.PICOT question.
5.Literature search strategy employed.
6. Evaluation of the literature.
7. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized.
8. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures.
9. Discussion of how evidence-based practice was used in creating the intervention plan.
10. Plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention.
11. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome.
12. Appendix section, for evaluation tools and educational materials, etc. are created.
Review the feedback from your instructor on the PICOT Question Paper, and Literature Review. Use this feedback to make appropriate revisions to these before submitting.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
RN to BSN
1.4: Implement patient care decisions based on evidence-based practice.
2.2: Manage patient care within the changing environment of the health care system.
Rubric Criteria
Revisions Incorporated as Directed by Instructor
Criteria Descriiption
Revisions Incorporated as Directed by Instructor
5. Target
8 points
All revisions are incorporated. The revision greatly improves the accuracy and clarity of the project.
4. Acceptable
7.12 points
The key aspects were revised. The revision generally improves the accuracy and clarity of the project.
3. Approaching
6.32 points
Most key aspects were revised. Some aspects are still vague or contain minor inaccuracies.
2. Insufficient
6 points
Revision is incomplete. Many aspects are still incomplete, inaccurate, or unclear.
1. Unsatisfactory
Revision is omitted.
Background
Criteria Descriiption
Background
5. Target
8 points
Background of clinical problem are clearly and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.
4. Acceptable
7.12 points
Background of clinical problem are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.
3. Approaching
6.32 points
Background of clinical problem are summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is needed.
2. Insufficient
6 points
Background of clinical problem is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Background of clinical problem omitted
Assessment Descriiption In this assignment, students will pull together the caps
in
Table of Contents
Assignment Description
Get Solution
Use our smart AI tool for quick support or get expert help tailored to your needs.
Leave a Reply