Week 3 Discussion The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of I

Week 3 Discussion The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Informatics and Surveillance website contains a number of resources nurses could innovatively incorporate in care delivery. The CDC Wonder site could be utilized by nurses in a number of ways. https://wonder.cdc.gov/Links to an external site.
For this discussion you will:
Identify one of the resources at the CDC Wonder site above and describe how a nurse might use this information in practice.
How might nurses utilizing telehealth benefit from these resources?
Address what you find innovative about the link.
Feel free to share some of your nursing innovation ideas!Discussion Questions
Grading Rubric RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswer Post•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and
•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts
16 pts100% Excellent
Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.
14 pts88% Good
Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.
13 pts80% Fair
Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.
6 pts38% Poor
Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.
0 pts0% Missing
Does not answer the discussion question(s).
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Sources•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,
•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,
•All sources are credited within the body of the post,
•Evidence supports the discussion, and
•APA format is not required but is encouraged.
12 pts100% Excellent
Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.
11 pts88% Good
Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.
10 pts80% Fair
Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.
5 pts38% Poor
Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.
0 pts0% Missing
Does not integrate any evidence.
12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReply Post•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,
•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and
•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
14 pts100% Excellent
Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
12 pts88% Good
Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.
11 pts80% Fair
Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.
5 pts38% Poor
Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.
0 pts0% Missing
No reply post to classmates or instructor.
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunicates ProfessionallyAll posts:
•are clear and concise,
•are respectful, civil, and caring, and
•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
8 pts100% Excellent
All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
7 pts88% Good
All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
6 pts80% Fair
All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
3 pts38% Poor
All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
0 pts0% Missing
All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipationDuring the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):
•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and
•Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 ptsNo Points Deducted
During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 ptsPoints Deducted (-5 Points)
During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days
0 pts
Total Points: 50