Critique each article using the appropriate appraisal form: Systematic or Integr

Critique each article using the appropriate appraisal form:
Systematic or Integrative ReviewDownload Systematic or Integrative Review
Use the information below to help you know which section of the article to use to answer questions in the template:
Introduction and its subsections have the purpose or WHY the study was done.
Methods section and its subsections contain HOW the study was done.
Results, Discussion, and Conclusions section will have WHAT was found.
Details
In Week 2 you selected a topic of interest and formulated a question about that topic for your Evidence-Based Practice Assignment.
In Week 6 you are completing an appraisal of the two articles, which were the quantitative and qualitative research study reports you were approved for in Week 4. The third article you appraise is an evidence-based practice clinical guideline that is related to your Week 2 topic(medication errors).
Module 6 readings are a continuation from Week 5 that includes chapters 13 and 14 on Appraising Research Evidence and Clinical Practice Guidelines. Please refer to these chapters on how to complete an appraisal using templates provided here in the instructions. Appendix A to G in your book gives you examples of completing a template appraisal form.
For the first template in Week 6 you will choose either a Qualitative or a Quantitative Review (Please do not complete both Quantitative and Qualitative Appraisal). Your second article is a Systematic Review Appraisal, and your 3rd article is an Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline.
There are hyperlinks to these templates in Week 6 instructions. Do not create your word document with answers.
Each section of the template is required to be completed as this assignment builds on your Evidence-Based Practice Project. Each template has a citation that must be submitted in APA 7th-ed format. Answers to questions in Synopsis sections are required (see template examples mentioned above in your book). Credibility section Yes/No answers are also required. The Comments area is also required and should be at least 1-3 sentences noting how this article relates to your nursing issue topic from Week 2(Medication errors) and what you thought was significant.
You will use these articles again in Week 8 Model and Barrier Paper and your Week 9 Evidence-Based Practice Project Poster.
Please review the rubric closely and proof your work by reviewing instructions before you submit.
Rubric:
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing and APA Style
Follows all the requirements related to 7th ed APA format for citation, length, source citations, and layout.
Writing is clear, concise, and organized.
Free of spelling errors. Grammatically correct.
15 to >12.0 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Follows APA Guidelines. Complete Formatting and writing. APA with 1 or fewer errors.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynopsis
Each question answered in full sentences 1 to 2 sentences per question.
15 to >12.0 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Uses approved article to complete. Evidence of critical thinking. Ideas well developed.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCredibility
Answer yes or no questions and add a statement 1 to 2 sentences in length under each question
15 to >12.0 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Uses approved article to complete. Evidence of critical thinking & Ideas well developed
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClinical Significance and Applicability for Clinical Practice Guidelines
Answer yes or no questions and add a statement 1 to 2 sentences in length under each question
15 to >12.0 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Uses approved article to complete. Evidence of critical thinking & Ideas well developed
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComments
Using your own words (no direct quotes), describe in 1 paragraph how this article relates to your nursing issue topic from week three and what you thought was significant.
15 to >12.0 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Exceptionally well presented; ideas detailed and well developed