A cohort study examined the connection between teenage physical activity, mental

A cohort study examined the connection between teenage physical activity, mental health, and signs of mental health disorders.
Bell, Sarah Louise; Audrey; David; Ashley; Cooper; Rona Campbell; Gunnell;
2019’s Vol. 16 (1) of the International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, pages 138-138

The Johns Hopkins Evaluation Instrument
The article’s quality was assessed using the Johns Hopkins Assessment Tool. Because it used a prospective cohort design to reduce the chance of bias, the article received a high score for internal validity. The article was methodologically sound as well, with stated objectives, a sample size and composition that were suitable for the investigation, as well as the use of suitable statistical techniques. However, because the sample was restricted to teenagers in the UK and might not be generalizable to other groups, the article received a lower grade for external validity.
Method, Design, Objective, Sample Size, and Features
The authors investigated the association between adolescent mental health, physical activity, and symptoms of mental health disorders using a prospective cohort study design.
Explanation:
Please assist me in responding to these inquiries based on this article: A cohort study examined the connection between teenage physical activity, mental health, and signs of mental health disorders.
Bell, Sarah Louise; Audrey; David; Ashley; Cooper; Rona Campbell; Gunnell;
2019’s Vol. 16 (1) of the International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, pages 138-138

The Johns Hopkins Evaluation Instrument
The article’s quality was assessed using the Johns Hopkins Assessment Tool. Because it used a prospective cohort design to reduce the chance of bias, the article received a high score for internal validity. The article was methodologically sound as well, with stated objectives, a sample size and composition that were suitable for the investigation, as well as the use of suitable statistical techniques. However, because the sample was restricted to teenagers in the UK and might not be generalizable to other groups, the article received a lower grade for external validity.
Method, Design, Objective, Sample Size, and Features
The authors investigated the association between adolescent mental health, physical activity, and symptoms of mental health disorders using a prospective cohort study design.
Prospective cohort study is the design.
The study’s goal was to investigate the connection between teenage physical activity, mental health, and signs of mental health disorders.
Sample Size and Characteristics: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) in the UK provided 872 teenagers aged 12 to 18 for the study. Those who were physically active and those who were not were divided into two categories in the sample.
Research Results
The study’s findings demonstrated a relationship between physical activity and improved mental health and a reduction in the signs of mental health disorders in adolescents. The findings specifically demonstrated that teenagers who were physically active performed better on ratings measuring mental wellness and performed worse on scales measuring mental health disorders.
Strengths and Drawbacks
Strengths: The study’s prospective cohort design, which reduced the possibility of bias, as well as its methodologically sound approach—which included clear objectives, a sample size and set of characteristics that were appropriate for the study, as well as the use of suitable statistical techniques—are its main points of strength.
The study’s weaknesses include its poor external validity because its sample was restricted to British teens and might not be generalizable to other populations. The absence of an objective measure of physical activity from the study may have also affected the findings.
Evaluation of Research Degree and Quality
Second-level research
Rating for quality: B
What Concerned Me or I Found Most Intersting
The relationship between physical activity and improved mental health and fewer signs of mental health disorders in teens intrigued me the most. This conclusion is significant because it raises the possibility that physical activity may serve as a safeguard for teenagers’ mental health. I was also worried about the study’s limitations because the sample was restricted to British teens and might not apply to other populations. The absence of an objective measure of physical activity from the study may have also affected the findings.
Bell et alarticle, .’s “The link between physical exercise, mental wellness, and symptoms of mental health disorder in adolescents: a cohort study,” (Bell et al., 2019) aims to investigate this association. The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) in the UK provided 872 teenagers ages 12 to 18 for the prospective cohort research that the authors employed. The study’s findings demonstrated a relationship between physical activity and improved mental health and a reduction in the signs of mental health disorders in adolescents. The study’s prospective cohort design, which reduced the possibility of bias, as well as its methodologically sound approach—which included clear objectives, a sample size and set of characteristics that were suitable for the study, as well as the use of suitable statistical techniques—are its strongest points.
The study’s conclusions are significant because they imply that physical activity may help protect adolescents’ mental health. Adolescence is a time of transition and is linked to a higher risk of developing mental health issues. An important insight into how physical activity might be used to improve the mental health of teenagers is provided by the discovery that it is connected with increased mental wellbeing and decreased symptoms of mental health disorders in adolescents. Given that one in three adolescents globally do not reach the required levels of physical exercise, this is especially crucial given the current context of adolescent physical inactivity.
Nonetheless, it is important to be aware of several study limitations. The sample was restricted to UK teenagers, and it’s possible that it can’t be applied to other populations. The absence of an objective measure of physical activity from the study may have also affected the findings. The study’s cross-sectional design, which prevents drawing inferences regarding causality, was another limitation.
Notwithstanding these drawbacks, the study’s results offer vital new information about the possible advantages of physical activity for teenage mental health. This study emphasises the need for more investigation into the link between adolescent physical activity and mental health, as well as the creation of programmes to promote adolescent physical exercise. Such measures could boost teenagers’ general wellbeing and lower their chance of developing mental health issues.
REFERENCES
1. Bell, S.L., Audrey, S., Gunnell, D., Cooper, A. & Campbell, R., 2019. The relationship between physical activity, mental wellbeing and symptoms of mental health disorder in adolescents: A cohort study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(1).
2. World Health Organization. (2020). Physical activity. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity
PLEASE USE THE TEXT ABOVE AND FILL IN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS BELLOW:
Conduct a search of the library to find one quantitative research article related to one of the National Practice Problems. You will use the quantitative article you have selected for your paper. The DNP-prepared nurse uses the most recent (within 5 years) evidence available.
The quantitative source of evidence you select must be a single source of evidence. Systematic reviews and/or mixed-methods are not permitted for this assignment.
Present the written reference and the permalink to the article you chose.
Attach your completed Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool to your response.
Present the method, design, aim/purpose, sample size and characteristics, research findings, share the strengths and limitations, state the research level (I, II, or III) and quality appraisal (A, B, or C).
Describe what you found most interesting or concerning in the study you selected.