Discuss the importance of language or voice when writing the research narrative.

Discussion Topic
Based on this week’s focus:
Discuss the importance of language or voice when writing the research narrative. In your opinion, should you narrate as the researcher and refrain from using “I”, or should you express a tone that encompasses a greater audience and lends to an “easier” interpretation? How does your writing style impact your ‘voice’ and ‘tone’? Explain.
Please remember for discussion posts: the initial post must be uploaded by the WEDNESDAY of the week and two replies to your peers by Saturday at 2359.
Please note the grading rubric for the discussion board.

ANSWER
The choice of whether to narrate as the researcher and use “I” or adopt a more impersonal tone that encompasses a broader audience is a crucial decision when writing a research narrative. Both approaches have their merits and can effectively convey the research findings to the intended audience.

Narration using “I”

Narrating using “I” can lend a personal touch to the research narrative, making it more relatable and engaging for the reader. It allows the researcher to share their experiences, insights, and challenges throughout the research process, fostering a sense of connection between the researcher and the reader. This approach can be particularly effective in disciplines where personal experiences and reflections are valued, such as qualitative research or social sciences.

However, using “I” can also introduce subjectivity and potential bias into the narrative. The researcher’s personal voice may overshadow the objectivity of the research findings. Additionally, excessive use of “I” may come across as self-indulgent or detract from the focus on the research itself.

Impersonal Tone

Adopting an impersonal tone can provide a more objective and authoritative presentation of the research narrative. It allows the research findings to stand on their own, without being unduly influenced by the researcher’s personal experiences or opinions. This approach is often preferred in disciplines where objectivity and neutrality are highly valued, such as quantitative research or natural sciences.

However, an impersonal tone can also make the research narrative less engaging and accessible to a wider audience. The lack of a personal connection with the researcher may make it difficult for readers to relate to the research and appreciate its significance. Additionally, an overly impersonal tone can come across as dry and academic, potentially alienating non-expert readers.

Impact of Writing Style on Voice and Tone

Writing style plays a significant role in shaping the voice and tone of a research narrative. Clear, concise, and well-structured writing enhances the credibility and persuasiveness of the research findings. Active voice and vivid language can engage the reader and make the narrative more compelling.

Conversely, convoluted sentence structures, jargon, and excessive technical language can hinder comprehension and make the narrative less accessible to a wider audience. A lack of clarity and coherence can undermine the credibility of the research and make it difficult for readers to grasp the key findings.

In conclusion, the decision of whether to narrate as the researcher and use “I” or adopt a more impersonal tone depends on the specific research context, the intended audience, and the overall tone of the narrative. Both approaches can be effective in conveying the research findings, but careful consideration should be given to the impact of writing style on voice and tone to ensure that the narrative effectively communicates the research and engages the intended audience.