I need the answers to 4 questions answered for the attached article and the answ

I need the answers to 4 questions answered for the attached article and the answers do not need to be more than 1-2 sentences if not numerical in nature.
– Which Literacy Risk Only group of students—Comparison or Intervention Group—had statistically significantly higher pre-test scores on the Listening Comprehension and Expository Retell measures?
– For the “main-effects model” only, was there a statistically significant intervention effect for scores on narrative retell? (Yes or No) Note: This information starts at the bottom paragraph of page 346.
– For the “main-effects model” only, was there a statistically significant intervention effect for scores on vocabulary? (Yes or No) Note: This information starts at the bottom paragraph of page 346.
– On page 348, second full paragraph, the authors state, “The read aloud intervention did not have a statistically significant effect on student listening comprehension (gamma01 ＝ 0.44, t ＝ 0.73, p ＝ .48) or expository retell (gamma01 ＝ 0.78, t ＝ 2.06, p ＝ .07), …” Provide a one or two sentence interpretation of the nonstatistically significant effect of students’ listening comprehension posttest mean scores between the comparison and intervention group. In other words, what, if any, interpretations can be made regarding the differences in listening comprehension average scores between the intervention and comparison groups?
Note: Pay attention in Question 10 to the difference between when researchers say two groups are statistically and significantly different from one another than when researchers state that two groups are not statistically and significantly different from one another.