Week 7 Presentation of Community Teaching Project Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 1

Week 7 Presentation of Community Teaching Project
Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 140 Submitting a text entry box
Utilize the epidemiologic process to identify a community health need or problem. Plan, implement, and evaluate a group health teaching project to meet the identified need.
Assignment Instructions:
Select a topic and get instructor approval to move forward with it.
Select your target community group that you will focus on educating. It should consist of approximately 10 individuals. A minimum of two different teaching sessions should be presented to the same group at least one week apart.
Once your topic is approved and a teaching group is chosen, you will create a teaching plan, hold your teaching sessions, and then evaluate the implementation.
The final product you submit will be a presentation that details the entire process: your chosen topic, the teaching style you used, and an evaluation of your actual teaching. (See categories below for details to include.)
Prepare a 15- to 20-slide presentation that is a minimum of 20 minutes in duration. You should have APA formatted in-text citations within your slides for any outside sources used and your final slide should be a reference slide that lists all resources used for the assignment.
Videos can be recorded using any software or tool, but all videos are required to be uploaded to My Panopto Videos for assignment submission.
You can also use the Panopto Desktop Recording tool to create your video.
Click hereLinks to an external site. for detailed Panopto instructions.
Items to Include in Presentation:
Provide a comprehensive statement of the problem using the epidemiological process including the distribution, determinants, and deterrents.
Incorporate at least four current literature review findings as a theoretical base for your project/paper.
Describe community resources available to meet the need of the specific community in this problem area. Summarize the resources available and describe their effectiveness for the community.
Describe your selected group. Identify and summarize the learner needs of your selected group. What are the needs? Why does this group need to be educated on your chosen topic?
Identify and describe developmental and teaching/learning theory/theories used and why they are appropriate to the learners you targeted.
Describe in behavioral terms your specific planning process for your project and overall teaching goal for your participants.
Evaluate your teaching experience. Reflect on the following questions. What went well? What did not? What would you change if you were teaching this topic to a similar group at a later date and why?
Due: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Points Possible: 140
Rubric
NURS_495L-B_DE – NURS 495L-B Week 7 Community Teaching Project and Presentation
NURS_495L-B_DE – NURS 495L-B Week 7 Community Teaching Project and Presentation
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic/Introduction
28 to >22.12 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides a comprehensive statement of the problem using the epidemiological process including the distribution, determinants, and deterrents. Describes the selected group, and identifies and summarizes the learner needs of the selected group, including why this group needs to be educated on the chosen topic.
22.12 to >19.32 pts
Approaching Expectations
Provides a statement of the problem using the epidemiological process, but lacks detail. Describes the selected group, and identifies and summarizes the learner needs of the selected group, including why this group needs to be educated on the chosen topic.
19.32 to >16.52 pts
Falls Below Expectations
Provides a statement of the problem using the epidemiological process, but lacks details. Describes the selected group, and why this group was chosen, but lacks a clear summary of all identified learner needs for the selected group.
16.52 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The comprehensive statement of the problem is unclear and incomplete. There is no clear picture of the group or their needs.
28 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
56 to >44.24 pts
Meets Expectations
Describes the community resources available to meet the need of the specific community in this problem area. Summarizes the resources available and describes their effectiveness for the community. Identifies and describes developmental and teaching/learning theory/theories used and why they are appropriate to the learners targeted. Describes in behavioral terms the specific planning process for the project and overall teaching goal for the participants. Incorporates at least four current literature review findings as a theoretical base for the project/paper.
44.24 to >38.64 pts
Approaching Expectations
Describes the community resources available, but full analysis of all required elements may be lacking the required detail (e.g., community resources may all be listed, but effectiveness of each is lacking full detail; learning theories might be fully identified, but appropriateness for the specific group may be lacking in detail). Fewer than four current literature review findings are included.
38.64 to >33.04 pts
Falls Below Expectations
Describes the community resources available, but full analysis of all required elements may be lacking the required detail (e.g., community resources may all be listed, but effectiveness of each is lacking full detail; learning theories might be fully identified, but appropriateness for the specific group may be lacking in detail), but more than one required element in a section may be missing. Only two current literature review findings are included.
33.04 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Analysis is lacking. Paper includes a list of required topics, but no further reasoning or support is included. Only one or two current literature review findings are included.
56 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
28 to >22.12 pts
Meets Expectations
Evaluates the teaching experience. Reflects on the following questions: What went well? What did not go well? What would you change if you were teaching this topic to a similar group at a later date and why?
22.12 to >19.32 pts
Approaching Expectations
Evaluates the teaching experience. Reflects on the following questions: What went well? What did not go well? Student does not describe a change or different way to teach a similar group based on this experience.
19.32 to >16.52 pts
Falls Below Expectations
Evaluates the teaching experience. Only reflects on one of the following questions: What went well? What did not go well? Student does not describe a change or different way to teach a similar group based on this experience.
16.52 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Reflection is brief and does not answer all of the questions posed.
28 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
7 to >5.53 pts
Meets Expectations
Writing is clear, concise, formal, and organized. Slides are mostly error free. Information from sources is paraphrased appropriately and accurately referenced and cited in APA style. A title slide, clear introduction and conclusion, and reference slide are included. The number of references required by the assignment is presented. In-text APA citations are used in the presentation.
5.53 to >4.83 pts
Approaching Expectations
Writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is paraphrased, referenced, and cited correctly in APA style. A title slide, clear introduction and conclusion, and reference slide are included. The number of references required by the assignment is presented. In-text APA citations are used in the presentation.
4.83 to >4.13 pts
Falls Below Expectations
Writing is generally unclear and unorganized. There are several spelling and grammar errors. Information from sources is missing or improperly cited.
4.13 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension, AND/OR writing includes slang or is inappropriate for academic discourse. APA style is not present.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation
21 to >16.59 pts
Meets Expectations
Presentation is 15–20 slides and a minimum of 20 minutes in duration. Presentation is either full audio/video with integrated PowerPoint or includes speaker notes or a video of student presenting the actual lessons with a separate reflective video using the media tools. Quality is clear and audible. Good language skills and pronunciation is used; information is well communicated. Still images of the lessons are included if actual video is not.
16.59 to >14.49 pts
Approaching Expectations
Presentation is either full audio/video with integrated PowerPoint or includes speaker notes or a video of the student presenting the content and a separate reflective video using the media tools. Quality is clear and audible. Good language skills and pronunciation are used; information is well communicated. Still images of the lessons are included if actual video is not. Presentation may have a slight audio or visual technical issue or might not quite meet the required length.
14.49 to >12.39 pts
Falls Below Expectations
Presentation is full video, but lacks audio completely and speaker notes are incomplete. Presentation does not meet the required length.
12.39 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Completely lacks audio or speaker notes and does not meet the required length.
21 pts
Total Points: 140