salman When doing scientific research, researchers are expected to adhere to a c

salman
When doing scientific research, researchers are expected to adhere to a code of conduct based on established research ethics. In order to ensure the safety, privacy, and respect of study participants, it is crucial to act in accordance with established ethical guidelines. Therefore, an ethics committee should assess each study that includes human participants to make sure it complies with all applicable regulations. Ethical discussion primarily focuses on the three pillars of beneficence, justice, and autonomy (World Health Organization, 2021).
Researchers also need to avoid using any form of coercion to get people to take part in experiments. Implied or direct threats of punishment for non-participation or other forms of opting-out are examples of coercion. Furthermore, offering excessive benefits for agreeing to engage can also be seen as coercion, since the participant may feel compelled to take part in order to receive the reward, even if they would have denied participation in the absence of the reward. Potential participants’ autonomy may be compromised if they are compelled to join a research in exchange for financial compensation (Barrow & Khandhar, 2019).
The study which I selected is titled with Nurses’ Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture in Three Hospitals in Saudi Arabia. In this study, the researchers applied the principles of ethics with many points as following; this research project was given the approved by the Institutional Review Board of the College of Medicine at King Saud University (Project Number E-16-1742). Attached to each questionnaire was a cover letter that included an explanation of the purpose of the study, as well as the processes that were involved and the level of cooperation that was anticipated from the respondents. Before beginning the survey, respondents were asked to sign a document indicating that they had read and understood all of the information provided to them regarding the study, and that they were participating voluntarily. Throughout the course of the research, confidentiality was ensured and upheld at all times. The respondents were not provided any sort of compensation or reward for their participation in the study. The final author sent an e-mail to the person who owned the rights to the questionnaire on September 10, 2014, requesting permission to use the HSOPSC (Reference No. 24–31430) (Alquwez et al., 2018).
Research ethics is a fundamental idea that underpins all aspects of contemporary medical research across all fields. It is on purpose that the overarching body known as the IRB is made up of specialists from a wide variety of fields. These specialists can include ethicists, social workers, physicians, nurses, other scientific researchers, counselors and mental health professionals, and advocates for subjects who are particularly vulnerable. In addition, there is frequently a legal expert either on the panel or accessible to it to examine any problems surrounding the legality of research or the repercussions they may have (Barrow & Khandhar, 2019).
References
Alquwez, N., Cruz, J. P., Almoghairi, A. M., Al-otaibi, R. S., Almutairi, K. O., Alicante, J. G., & Colet, P. C. (2018). Nurses’ Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture in Three Hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50(4), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12394
Barrow, J. M., & Khandhar, P. B. (2019). Research Ethics. Nih.gov; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459281/
World Health Organization. (2021). Ensuring Ethical Standards and Procedures for Research with Human Beings. WHO. https://www.who.int/activities/ensuring-ethical-st…
this is was qoustion Research the National Committee of BioEthics (NCBE) Implementing Regulations of the Law of Ethics of Research on Living Creatures in Saudi Arabia (https://prod.kau.edu.sa/Med/ali/files/Publications/Guide/National_Committe_of_BioEthics-Regulations_of_the_Law_of_Ethics_of_Research_on_Living_Creatures.pdf.)
Select any of the many articles related to your profession or resonate with your student research topic. How could these guidelines be integrated to ensure the researcher’s adherence to the standard?