PART 3: INTERVIEW WRITE-UP When you conducted your interview for Part 2 of the F

PART 3: INTERVIEW WRITE-UP
When you conducted your interview for Part 2 of the Final Project, you completed a critical portion of your project. This interview will provide you with significant information and insight concerning the counseling group and setting that interests you.
With this foundation, you can now analyze what was discussed during the interview more thoroughly, and consider how it might impact your disposition and methods moving forward. You can also reflect on your original vision of your professional life and consider whether anything from the interview may affect that.
For Part 3 of your Final Project, you will submit the write-up of your interview with the mental health counselor you selected. For your interview and final write-up, you will demonstrate both breadth and depth of knowledge and critical thinking appropriate to graduate-level scholarship. Refer back to any pertinent Learning Resources throughout this course that might support your write-up. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate your mastery of the concepts presented throughout this course. APA style citations throughout your paper are required.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
TO PREPARE:
Review your notes and the audiotape of your interview with the mental health counselor.
In the Week 1 Spark Discussion, you described your vision for your future professional life as a counselor. Return to this Spark Discussion and consider what you wrote.
Please review the Bureau of Labor Statistics report in this week’s Learning Resources. Relevant labor market information starts on page 12 of the report.
For Part 3 of your Final Project, you must follow APA Publication Manual guidelines; eliminate typographical, spelling, and grammatical errors; and adhere to Walden’s Academic Integrity guidelines. (Information on scholarly writing may be found in the APA Publication Manual and at the Walden Writing Center website. Also, see “Policies on Academic Honesty” under Walden University Policies and Information in the Guidelines and Policies area.)
Please review the Final Project Rubric located in the Course Information section of the course.
Use the Final Project Template found in this week’s Learning Resources to help create your write-up for this Final Project Part 3.
FINAL PROJECT PART 3
Your write-up should be 5 to 7 pages in length (double-spaced), not including the title page and references. It should include the following:
A detailed write-up of the interview, with links back to the Learning Resources. Note: Your write-up should be presented as a narrative rather than a listing of questions and answers.
In your write-up include how this information relates to the material in the course. (Cite the Learning Resources from the course consistently throughout your paper using APA style citations.)
Provide a reflection on the following questions:Consider your response to the Week 1 Spark Discussion question. How has your vision changed over the past 10 weeks? What is the same? What new insights have you gained?
What did you learn from the interview that you did not learn in the course?
What, if anything, did you learn from the interview that contrasted with what you learned in the course?
What do you anticipate the impact of being a clinical mental health counselor may be on who you are personally?
BY DAY 7
Submit your Final Project Part 3.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final project, you can check your publish for authenticity. To check your publish, access the Turnitin publishs from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed project, save your Project as WK10Proj_LastName_Firstinitial
Then, click on Start Project near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Project for review.
Rubric
COUN_6100_Week10_Project_Rubric
COUN_6100_Week10_Project_Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponsiveness:By Day 7, submit your write-up, 5 to 7 pages in length (double-spaced), not including the title page and references. It should include a detailed write-up of the interview with links back to the Learning Resources, presented as a narrative rather than a listing of questions and answers.In your write-up include how this information relates to the material in the course. Provide a reflection on the following questions:Consider your response to the Week 1 Spark Discussion question. How has your vision changed over the past 10 weeks? What is the same? What new insights have you gained?What did you learn from the interview that you did not learn in the course?What, if anything, did you learn from the interview that contrasted with what you learned in the course?What do you anticipate the impact of being a clinical mental health counselor may be on who you are personally?
8 to >7.1 ptsA (90.00% to 100.00%)
Paper is responsive to and exceeds the requirements given in the instructions. It:… 1.) Responds to assigned or selected topic;… 2.) Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., ideas contribute a new dimension to what we know about the topic, unearths something unanticipated, etc.)
7.1 to >6.3 ptsB (80.00% to 89.9%)
Paper is responsive to and meets the requirements given in the instructions. It:… 1.) Responds to the assigned or selected topic;… 2.) Addresses each point of the assignment.
6.3 to >5.5 ptsC (70.00% to 79.9%)
Paper is somewhat responsive to the requirements given in the instructions. It:… 1.) Somewhat misses the point of the assigned or selected topic; and/or… 2.) Addresses less than all of the points of the assignment but more than half.
5.5 to >0 ptsF (0% to 69.9%)
Paper is unresponsive to the requirements given in the instructions. It:… 1.) Misses the point of the assigned or selected topic; and/or… 2.) Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and/or… 3.) Addresses less than half of the aspects of the assignment.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Knowledge:The extent to which the content in the paper or writing assignment demonstrates an understanding of the important knowledge the paper/assignment is intended to demonstrate.
8 to >7.1 ptsA (90.00% to 100.00%)
The paper demonstrates:… 1.) In-depth understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations or analyses; accurate and perceptive parallels, ideas, opinions, and conclusions) showing that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented and makes inferences about the concepts/issues or connects to them to other ideas;… 2.) Rich and relevant examples;… 3.) Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, original thinking, new perspectives;… 4.) Original and critical thinking; and… 5.) Mastery and thoughtful/accurate application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course.
7.1 to >6.3 ptsB (80.00% to 89.9%)
The paper demonstrates:… 1.) Understanding and application of the concepts and issues presented in the course demonstrating that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented;… 2.) Relevant examples;… 3.) Thought-provoking ideas and interpretations, some original thinking; and… 4.) Critical thinking; and… 5.) Mastery and application of knowledge and skills or strategies presented in the course.
6.3 to >5.5 ptsC (70.00% to 79.9%)
The paper demonstrates:… 1.) Minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, although generally accurate, displays some omissions and/or errors; and/or… 2.) Few and/or irrelevant examples; and/or… 3.) Few if any thought-provoking ideas, little original thinking; and/or… 4.) “Regurgitated” knowledge rather than critical thinking;… 5.) Little mastery of skills and/or numerous errors when using the knowledge, skills or strategies presented in the course.
5.5 to >0 ptsF (0% to 69.9%)
The paper demonstrates:… 1.) Lack of understanding of the concepts and issues presented in the course and/or application is inaccurate and contains many omissions and/or errors; and/or… 2.) No examples or irrelevant examples; and/or… 3.) No thought-provoking ideas or original thinking; and/or… 4.) No critical thinking; and/or… 5.) Many critical errors when applying knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the course.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Writing:The extent to which the student communicated in a way that meets graduate level writing or communication expectations.
4 to >3.59 ptsA (90.00% to 100.00%)
Writing or communication exceeds graduate-level expectations. The paper:… 1.) Includes language that is clear, concise, and appropriate;… 2.) Has few, if any, errors in spelling (if written), grammar, and syntax;… 3.) Is extremely well organized, logical, clear, and never confuses the reader or listener;… 4.) Uses a preponderance of original language and uses direct quotes only when necessary and/or appropriate;… 5.) Provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it.
3.59 to >3.19 ptsB (80.00% to 89.9%)
Writing or communication meets graduate-level expectations. The paper:… 1.) Includes language that is clear;… 2.) Has a few errors in spelling (if written), grammar, and syntax;… 3.) Is well organized, logical, and clear;… 4.) Uses original language and uses direct quotes when necessary and/or appropriate;… 5.) Provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it.
3.19 to >2.79 ptsC (70.00% to 79.9%)
Writing or communication is somewhat below graduate-level expectations: The paper:… 1.) Includes language that is unclear and/or inappropriate; and/or… 2.) Has more than occasional errors in spelling (if written), grammar, and syntax; and/or… 3.) Is poorly organized, is at times unclear and confusing, and has some problems with logical flow; and/or… 4.) Reflects an underuse of original language and an overuse of direct quotes and paraphrases; and/or… 5.) Sometimes lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it.
2.79 to >0 ptsF (0% to 69.9%)
Writing or communication is well below graduate-level expectations: The paper:… 1.) Includes unclear and inappropriate language; and/or… 2.) Has many errors in spelling (if written), grammar, and syntax; and/or… 3.) Lacks organization in a way that creates confusion for the reader; and/or… 4.) Contains many direct quotes from original source materials and/or consistently and poorly paraphrases rather than using original language; and/or… 5.) Lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it.
4 pts
Total Points: 20
PreviousNext