2-1 Journal: Project Goals Listen ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen Focus Hide Assig

Assignment Description

2-1 Journal: Project Goals
Listen
ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
Focus
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
Turnitin™ enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Instructions

To complete this assignment, review the prompt and grading rubric in the Journal Guidelines and Rubric PDF document. When you have finished your work, submit the assignment here for grading and instructor feedback.

Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Journal Guidelines and Rubric
Print Rubric
Criteria
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Summary of Experience
20 points
Entry supports claims with a thoughtful reflection on the practical experience to date
15 points
Entry support claims with somewhat thoughtful reflection on the practical experience to date
0 points
Entry does not support claims with a thoughtful reflection
Score of Summary of Experience,/ 20
Critical Thinking and Reflection
20 points
Entry supports claims with relevant examples of the practical experience
15 points
Entry supports claims with somewhat relevant examples of the practical experience
0 points
Entry does not support claims with reflection on the practical experience
Score of Critical Thinking and Reflection,/ 20
Integration and Application
20 points
Entry shows alignment between the practical experience and application/integration in the final project or the public health sector
15 points
Entry shows some alignment between the practical experience and application/integration in the final project or the public health sector
0 points
Entry does not show alignment between the practical experience and the application/integration in the final project or public health sector
Score of Integration and Application,/ 20
Voice
20 points
Entry is written in a style that is generally appropriate for the intended audience, and an attempt is made to use a consistent voice
15 points
Entry is written in a style that considers the audience, but the author’s voice is not consistent and is difficult to identify
0 points
Entry does not attempt to use a style that considers audience, and there is no evidence of author voice
Score of Voice,/ 20
Writing
20 points
Entry is mostly free of errors of organization and grammar; existing errors are marginal and rarely interrupt the flow
15 points
Entry contains errors of organization and grammar, but errors are limited enough that entry can be understood
0 points
Entry contains errors of organization and grammar that make it difficult to understand
Score of Writing,/ 20
Total
Score of Journal Guidelines and Rubric,/ 100
Overall Score
Proficient
76 points minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Needs Improvement
1 point minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Not Evident
0 points minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Submit Assignment
Files to submit
(0) file(s) to submit
After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission.
Add a FileRecord AudioRecord Video
Comments

Paragraph

Lato (Recommended)
19px (Default)
SubmitCancel

Get Solution

Use our smart AI tool for quick support or get expert help tailored to your needs.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *