Please review the Discussion Board Requirements in the rubric. For the discussio

Please review the Discussion Board Requirements in the rubric. For the discussion boards each week, please answer the questions in light of your future role according to your program track. For example, if you are a nurse educator student, consider answering the questions from the perspective of a clinical adjunct or full-time faculty member.
Prompt
Identify two barriers to change in your organization that is also prevalent in the research literature on change management. Cite at least one current research article to support your post.
Create a tagline for your project that will assist to promote enthusiasm and “buy-in” from colleagues. Discuss the rationale for your choice. What strategies to promote and sustain change does your tagline employ? This content relates to Squire Guideline # 8 on interventions.
Consider a creative communication tool to demonstrate your tagline to the group. Youtube, a short video, song, demonstration, or graphic would be ideal!
Critically analyze and provide feedback to at least two of your peers.
Due Date: The initial post is due Thursday by 11:59 PM EST, and at least two peer response posts are due Sunday by 11:59 PM EST.
The last sample paper included a sample tag line and the previous questions include the Squire Guidelines. This one relates to Squire guideline #8.
Rubric
C-Squire Discussion Board Grading Rubric NSG 601 (1)
CriteriaRatingsPts
Demonstrates an understanding of the discussion prompt/questions in both initial and peer responses (if applicable)
view longer description
25 pts
Displays an excellent understanding of the course materials and the underlying concept being discussed.
20 pts
Displays some understanding of the course materials and the underlying concept being discussed.
15 pts
Displays little understanding of the course materials and the underlying concept being discussed.
0 pts
No Marks
25 / 25 pts
Connections to professional practice
view longer description
25 pts
Evidence of strong reflective thought pertaining to personal perspectives and professional role development in program track.
20 pts
Evidence of some reflective thought pertaining to personal perspectives and professional role development in program track.
15 pts
Little evidence of reflective thought pertaining to personal perspectives and professional role development in program track.
0 pts
No Marks
25 / 25 pts
Quality of writing, use of evidence
view longer description
10 pts
Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication. Reference citations are in APA format.
Evidence from the research literature is utilized, synthesized and applied to the topic of discussion and peer responses8 pts
Written responses are largely free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing generally facilitates communication. Some minor errors in reference citations and APA format.
Some evidence is utilized, applied and described6 pts
Written responses contain grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing does not facilitate communication. Multiple errors in APA format for references and citations.
Minimal use of evidence beyond course texts and resources0 pts
No Marks
10 / 10 pts
Applies content according to program track (nurse practitioner, educator, leadership, public health, other health profession
view longer description
15 pts
Full Marks
Full integration of future role into the concepts in the module10 pts
Some application of future role responsibilities
5 pts
Minimal application of future role responsibilities
0 pts
No Marks
15 / 15 pts
Demonstrates an understanding of appropriate Squire Guideline element and applies the content under discussion to personal project topic
view longer description
25 pts
Displays an excellent understanding of the course materials and the underlying concept being discussed.
20 pts
Displays some understanding of the course materials and the underlying concept being discussed.
15 pts
Displays little understanding of the course materials and the underlying concept being discussed.
0 pts
No Marks
20 / 25 pts
Total Points: 95