Please review the proposal publish feed back from instructed and use the template

Please review the proposal publish feed back from instructed and use the template exemplary and template provided..
Submit your final publish of the proposal plan for a grade.
Highly recommend that DNP Students review the DNP Project Guideline Document (See under DNP Resources) to ensure that all of the required components for Sections I/II/III are included in the Final DNP Proposal Paper.
For questions, contact the course manager or your DNP Project Faculty Lead.
Note: DNP Students will not submit proposal PowerPoint slides until next semester; therefore, there is no requirement to start publishing PowerPoint slides for the proposal unless the DNP Faculty Lead approves you.
Here are the instructions for the assignment; a scholarly paper must be uploaded for a grade:
Use APA 7th edition format, and avoid the use of personal pronouns.
This assignment should be no longer than 25 pages – no penalty if more or less than this number as long as the content aligns with the DNP Project guideline (excluding the title page, references, and appendices).
No need to include an abstract for this assignment (an abstract will be completed in future courses).
Include a table of contents. See the video in the course shell.
Select Grader
Final DNP Project Proposal Plan
Final DNP Project Proposal Plan
Criteria Ratings Pts
Section I
view longer descriiption
30 to >24 pts
Very thorough and detailed; Criteria met without need for changes
24 to >15 pts
Overall good but lacks some pertinent information and details; Meets criteria with areas for improvement
15 to >0 pts
Lacks several pertinent details; Minimally meets criteria
Comments
This is a good start. Please go back and look at the manuscriipt template in the course shell to be sure you’ve included all the components (abstract, table of contents etc..). The first section is where you really make the case for why this type of study is needed. Continue to fine tune and develop your purpose and aims.
28 / 30 pts
Section II
view longer descriiption
30 to >24 pts
Very thorough and detailed; Criteria met without need for changes
24 to >15 pts
Overall good but lacks some pertinent information and details; Meets criteria with areas for improvement
15 to >0 pts
Lacks several pertinent details; Minimally meets criteria
Comments
Section headings are there but some detail is lacking in the evidence review. Continue to work on the narrative of your evidence synthesis and critical appraisal. Refer to the exemplary models. I think they will help you frame your evidence discussion narrative a little more succinctly.
26 / 30 pts
Section III
view longer descriiption
30 to >24 pts
Very thorough and detailed; Criteria met without need for changes
24 to >15 pts
Overall good but lacks some pertinent information and details; Meets criteria with areas for improvement
15 to >0 pts
Lacks several pertinent details; Minimally meets criteria
Comments
Maybe too many frameworks were discussed. For clarity, on theoretical and one operational framework is sufficient.
27 / 30 pts
APA, spelling/grammar, appendices and overall flow
10 to >8 pts
Very thorough and detailed; Criteria met without need for changes
8 to >5 pts
Overall good but lacks some pertinent information and details; Meets criteria with areas for improvement
5 to >0 pts
Lacks several pertinent details; Minimally meets criteria
Comments
Pleas create your papers in Grammarly or other APA app. You may also want to consider editorial support so you don’t leave points on the table.
8 / 10 pts
Total Points: 89
DNP proposed plan.docx