Category: Health Care

Assignment Content
It is important to understand the different forms and categories in which health care policies are created. This assignment will help you practice identifying the forms and categories as well as understand the determinants that are impacted by the creation of health care policies.
Complete the Health Care Policy and Determinants worksheet.

Cite at least 2 reputable references used to complete your prompts and chart. Reputable references include trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, a textbook, or other sources of similar quality.
Format your references section and references used in your prompts and chart according to APA guidelines.
Submit your assignment.

The Dynamic Deliverable is the implementation (or proof of implementation) of students’ proposed solution. Previously submitted Dynamic Deliverables include, but are not limited to, websites students developed about their chosen themes, paintings, and a screenshot of the submission to the CDC of a student’s proposal. In the case of the student referenced in the Final Project Product Proposal as an example, for his dynamic deliverable, he submitted an image of his own painting of a melting earth due to climate change.
The “deliverable(s)” you create will mirror (to some extent) the types of materials your professor will utilize in the course to deliver content in diverse ways—to foster interest & problem/trend/issue analysis, provide additional context, and appeal to varying learning styles, abilities, and preferences of students en route to global awareness, perspective taking, & global engagement.
The Dynamic Deliverable may consist of student-created, original items such as, but not limited to:
Podcasts/Recorded Interview
TED (style) Talk/Speech (video recorded)
Poetry Series Composition
Music Composition & Performance
White-paper for Recommended Policy Change to Those in Power
Public Service Announcement Poster Series/Video Commercial
Product Prototype
Original Photography
Narrative Short Story
Targeted Program Development/Service Delivery Model
Scripted Mini-Movie
Site-Visit Observation, Critique, Formal Improvement Recommendation
***Students are also welcome and encouraged to propose solution-commentary-advocacy-activism “deliverable” materials they would like to pursue beyond this list.
Very Important:
The Dynamic Deliverable is anything that the writer want that is representing this topic Abortion and Family Planning in Latin America, it could be piece of art, professional photos it needs to coincide with this topic Abortion and Family Planning in Latin America. I uploaded a video please listen to it.

Write a 600-word limit proposal on on a key problem or challenge related to the topic of “Ageing”. More details are attached in the file.

I need a 1-page assignment 2 scope statement and a 1-page assignment 3 stakeholder analysis both assignments are related to implementing a Telehealth healthcare project in a rural area.

Stake holders PATIENT, RN AND pHYSICIAN
While completing your Business Case Analysis for a Healthcare Improvement course, you collaborated with your proposal team members, specialized experts in your field of interest, or colleagues from your current or former organization to assess the need for and feasibility of implementing your project using a project management approach. This process required the completion of several different analytic methods that support your recommendation for a healthcare improvement project (HIP).
In this task, you will begin to write your scholarly HIP paper that will place your proposed HIP in the context of the literature and provide evidence to support your project. In the introduction section of your paper, you should synthesize a select few key articles to provide the context, the problem or opportunity, and the purpose for your project.
In the next section, you will provide a review of scholarly sources published within the last five years that are credible and relevant to your HIP. A well-written review of the literature compares and contrasts published sources, highlights exemplary studies, identifies gaps in knowledge, and indicates how your project will fill the gap and advance nursing practice.
This task requires the submission of your entire HIP paper template including the following section(s) of your HIP paper which you will be developing in this performance assessment: • “Purpose Statement” • “Review of Relevant Scholarly Sources and Table of Scholarly Sources Template”
• “SMART+C Goal Worksheet”
• “Project Management Life Cycle”
Each of the following templates should be completed and submitted as an appendix to your HIP paper:
• Table of Relevant Scholarly Sources Template (Appendix C) • SMART+C Goal Worksheet (Appendix D)

Paper must have an ABSTRACT Page, Introduction, Body, Conclusion and References
A. Summarize medicare and its current status
B. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of Medicare
C. Discuss challenges and opportunities related to Medicare
D. Present recommendations for policy modification and/or program or system revisions
You must go in-depth with your assessments and provide empirical evidence from scientific literature.
Use in-text APA citation, references should be scholarly articles no more than 4-5 years old. Paper will be turned into TURNITIN. Please pay attention to the rubric and important mistakes attached. Please ensure you cite your references in APA format with a minimum of 8 academic references, including 4 peer-reviewed journal articles no more than 4-5 years old. Assignment will be graded based on the following areas: Foundation and synthesis of knowledge, application of knowledge critical thinking, writing skills, and organization of ideas and format.

3-1 Final Project Milestone One: Summary of Purpose and Needs and Capacity Assessment
Listen
ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
Focus
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
Turnitin™ enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Instructions

For this first milestone, you will identify the public health issue you have chosen to research for your policy or program evaluation. In a brief but formal summary of purpose, you will outline the purpose and significance of the public health issue and identify the overall goals of the policy or program. In addition, you will produce a needs and capacity assessment identifying resources and assets the community already has, additional resources that would be needed, and a justification of need for this policy or program using data-based academic resources.
To complete this assignment, review the Needs and Capacity Matrix Template Word Document and Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric PDF documents.

Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Milestone One Rubric
Print Rubric
Criteria
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Summary of Purpose: Scope and Nature
18 points
Includes a detailed description of the scope and nature of the public health issue using the five Ws of descriptive epidemiology, including the vulnerable or marginalized population/community, justified with academic resources
13.5 points
Includes a limited description of the scope and nature of the public health issue using the five Ws of descriptive epidemiology, including the vulnerable or marginalized population/community, justified with academic resources
0 points
Does not include a description of the scope and nature of a public issue
Score of Summary of Purpose: Scope and Nature,/ 18
Summary of Purpose: Social Determinants
18 points
Includes detailed information on the social determinants of health and epidemiological patterns or trends relevant to the issue and population, justifying with data from academic resources
13.5 points
Includes limited information on the social determinants of health and epidemiological patterns or trends relevant to the issue and population, with gaps in justification using data from academic resources
0 points
Does not include information on the social determinants of health and epidemiological patterns or trends relevant to the issue and population
Score of Summary of Purpose: Social Determinants,/ 18
Summary of Purpose: Benefits
18 points
Includes a complete summary of the benefits of the policy or program with regard to improving public health in the selected region and/or population and how it benefits the larger health system
13.5 points
Includes a limited summary of the benefits of the policy or program with regard to improving public health in the selected region and/or population and how it benefits the larger health system
0 points
Does not include a summary of the benefits of the policy or program with regard to improving public health in the selected region and/or population and how it benefits the larger health system
Score of Summary of Purpose: Benefits,/ 18
Needs and Capacity Assessment: Matrix
18 points
Includes a complete needs and capacity matrix, identifying resources and assets the community already has, as well as additional resources that would be needed to address the public health issue
13.5 points
Includes a limited needs and capacity matrix, identifying resources and assets the community already has, as well as additional resources that would be needed to address the public health issue
0 points
Does not include a needs and capacity matrix
Score of Needs and Capacity Assessment: Matrix,/ 18
Needs and Capacity Assessment: Summary
18 points
Includes a detailed summary of the needs and capacity matrix and justification of the need for this policy or program with data-based academic resources
13.5 points
Includes a limited summary of the needs and capacity matrix and justification of the need for this policy or program with data-based academic resources
0 points
Does not include a summary of the needs and capacity matrix or justification of the need for this policy or program with data-based academic resources
Score of Needs and Capacity Assessment: Summary,/ 18
Articulation of the Response
10 points
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
7.5 points
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
0 points
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
Score of Articulation of the Response,/ 10
Total
Score of Milestone One Rubric,/ 100
Overall Score
Points earned out of 100
76 points minimum
The overall submission earned 76 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
1 point minimum
The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
0 points minimum
The overall submission earned 0 points. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.

ARTICLE REVIEW ASSIGNMENTS INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
As this course makes clear, business law is a wide ranging and pervasive body of law that impacts many facets of business and life. Furthermore, it is critical that people seeking graduate-level degrees be familiar with and able to interact with scholarly literature and thought.
These Article Review Assignments, therefore, give you the opportunity to demonstrate your ability to analyze issues of business law as described above and interact with scholarly literature in the area.
INSTRUCTIONS
For each Article Review Assignment, you will:
(1) choose an excellent scholarly article published in the last calendar year addressing a topic related to business law covered in the course;
(2) carefully read and review the article chosen;
(3) write a 1,500-2,000 word review of the article in good Bluebook format:
(I) describing the article including:
(a) the topic or issue the article is addressing;
(b) the problem or research question identified by the author(s);
(c) a brief summary of the background law, literature review, or other information needed for contextual understanding;
(d) the proposal, conclusions, solution, or results from the article; and
(e) any other information you deem important to understanding the article
(II) critiquing and assessing the article’s analysis, conclusions, and/or recommendations (at least two clearly identified critiques must be included).
Each Article Review Assignment should be between 1,500–2,000 words, excluding the cover page and the reference list. In other words, the body itself of your Article Review should be between 1,500 and 2,000 words. You must stay within the required word range (no exceptions; indeed, a critical part of scholarly writing is synthesizing and summarizing important information (and omitting information that is not material)).
Each Article Review should be in good Bluebook format, contain 1-inch margins, use 12-point Ariel or New Times Roman font, and be double-spaced.
You do not need to include an abstract, but you do need to include a cover page and a reference list.
Each Article Review Assignment must cite as well as utilize at least 3 different scholarly, academic or legal sources (one of which must be the article chosen for review). Scholarly, academic or legal sources provided in the course materials or cited in the course materials should be preferred to the extent that they are relevant to the assignment. Please note, this is not requiring a minimum of 3 citations but rather 3 sources. You should have numerous citations throughout each Article Review as every major assertion should be supported by a citation to relevant authority.
Submit each Article Review Assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the Module: Week in which it is
OVERVIEW
As this course makes clear, business law is a wide ranging and pervasive body of law that impacts many facets of business and life. Furthermore, it is critical that people seeking graduate-level degrees be familiar with and able to interact with scholarly literature and thought.
These Article Review Assignments, therefore, give you the opportunity to demonstrate your ability to analyze issues of business law as described above and interact with scholarly literature in the area.
INSTRUCTIONS
For each Article Review Assignment, you will:
(1) choose an excellent scholarly article published in the last calendar year addressing a topic related to business law covered in the course;
(2) carefully read and review the article chosen;
(3) write a 1,500-2,000 word review of the article in good Bluebook format:
(I) describing the article including:
(a) the topic or issue the article is addressing;
(b) the problem or research question identified by the author(s);
(c) a brief summary of the background law, literature review, or other information needed for contextual understanding;
(d) the proposal, conclusions, solution, or results from the article; and
(e) any other information you deem important to understanding the article
(II) critiquing and assessing the article’s analysis, conclusions, and/or recommendations (at least two clearly identified critiques must be included).
Each Article Review Assignment should be between 1,500–2,000 words, excluding the cover page and the reference list. In other words, the body itself of your Article Review should be between 1,500 and 2,000 words. You must stay within the required word range (no exceptions; indeed, a critical part of scholarly writing is synthesizing and summarizing important information (and omitting information that is not material)).
Each Article Review should be in good Bluebook format, contain 1-inch margins, use 12-point Ariel or New Times Roman font, and be double-spaced.
You do not need to include an abstract, but you do need to include a cover page and a reference list.
Each Article Review Assignment must cite as well as utilize at least 3 different scholarly, academic or legal sources (one of which must be the article chosen for review). Scholarly, academic or legal sources provided in the course materials or cited in the course materials should be preferred to the extent that they are relevant to the assignment. Please note, this is not requiring a minimum of 3 citations but rather 3 sources. You should have numerous citations throughout each Article Review as every major assertion should be supported by a citation to relevant authority.
Submit each Article Review Assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the Module: Week in which it is assigned.
Note: Your assignments will be checked for originality via the TurnItIn plagiarism.

In 3 paragraphs, answer the following prompt: What do you think is the most urgent legal-ethical dilemma facing Advanced Practice Nurses today, and why? What advice would you give to an APRN/APN colleague who experienced such a dilemma? Use 2-3 scholarly articles as references for the assignment, citing in APA format.

Abstract = 20 points. DUE AUG 16, 2023. 1 page minimum (approx. 250 words) APA 1’ margins, 12 pt font, double spaced – Your project must be approved before you begin!!
● A research abstract is a concise and coherent summary of your proposed research. It sets out the central issues or questions that you intend to address. It outlines the general area of study within which your research falls, referring to the current state of knowledge and any recent debates on the topic