Category: Health Care

Your process should include the following: – An identification of the most prevalent and common medical errors in your facility – Risks associated with those medical errors – All individuals (staff, groups, agencies) who will be involved in the reporting process – Design a reporting template and be sure to include any workflow processes or tools can be used in the process – Provide a brief evaluation of departments responsible for following up on the errors and events. Your report should meet the following structural requirements: – Be 7 to 8 pages in length, not including the title or reference pages. – Be formatted according to APA 7th edition Saudi Electronic University writing guidelines. – Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of six scholarly articles. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, – – but four must be external. – Utilize headings to organize the content of your work.

Hypothetically Explain health or nursing informatics policy ( within 5 years) or regulation for further study.

based on Bharati Case: Please discuss the Statement…“Bharti’s executives discovered a slew of unexpected challenges in Africa.”

PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS & ATTACHEMENTS BELOW ANSWER EACH QUESTION/TOPIC ASSIGNMENT. NO PLAGIARISM.

Policies in healthcare have an impact on individuals, whether at the institutional, local, state, or federal level. As a profession, nursing has the opportunity to influence health policies on all levels. By understanding healthcare policies, nurses can be advocates for patients as a unified group. Although the majority of healthcare professionals are nurses, nursing has many opportunities to increase their involvement in healthcare policy. Healthcare and nursing practice are influenced by policy. Policy affects care delivery, patient preferences, and reimbursement. Nurses are in a unique position to influence policy due to the holistic care model and patient-centered care. For this task, you will analyze a federal and state policy that relates to a current area of focus in healthcare. You will discuss how the federal and state policies influence patient and healthcare delivery. You will consider the population impact of the policies and if the policies are equitable at both the federal and state level. Your goal in this task is to discuss how a nurse can impact policy at the state and federal level. You should consider the role of the nurse in the development of policy at the state and federal level and how the nurse will support or influence improvements to the policy at each policy level. REQUIREMENTS Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The similarity report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt). A. Compare public healthcare policies at the federal and state level that affect the provision of patient care and healthcare delivery by doing the following: 1. Describe one federal and one state public healthcare policy that affect the provision of patient care and healthcare delivery. 2. Explain how each policy works (e.g., Is it mandatory? Will enforcement be necessary? Who is responsible for administering the policy?). 3. Discuss each policy’s impact on the population(s) by answering the following questions: • What populations will benefit? • How will they benefit? • What populations will be negatively impacted? • How will they be impacted? • Does the policy impact health disparities and health equity? 4. Discuss the evidence that informs each policy, including two scholarly evidence sources published within the last five years to support your discussion. a. Discuss whether the evidence identified in part A4 supports the chosen policies, including any modifications that should be made to each policy based on the identified evidence. B. Explain the role of the nurse in policy development and how the nurse could impact the administration of, or the revision of, a policy at both federal and state levels. 1. Reflect on barriers to the nurse’s engagement in each of the following healthcare policy areas: • development • administration • revision 2. Reflect on ways that you will engage with healthcare policy in each of the following areas in your future nursing practice: • development • administration • revision C. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. RUBRIC A1:FEDERAL AND STATE PUBLIC HEALTHCARE POLICY NOT EVIDENT A description of 2 public healthcare policies is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The description of 1 federal or 1 state public healthcare policy does not accurately address the policy level or does not include the source for 1 or both public healthcare policies. COMPETENT The description accurately addresses 1 federal and 1 state public healthcare policy and includes the source for both public healthcare policies. A2:PUBLIC HEALTHCARE POLICY PROCESS NOT EVIDENT An explanation of how the selected healthcare policies from part A1 work is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The explanation does not thoroughly address how the federal or state public healthcare policy from part A1 works. Or the explanation does not provide relevant details from each policy. COMPETENT The explanation thoroughly addresses how each of the public healthcare policies from part A1 works, with relevant details from each policy. A3:POLICY IMPACT ON POPULATION(S) NOT EVIDENT A discussion of the impact each policy has on the population(s) is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The discussion does not address the impact each policy has on the population(s) by answering each of the 5 given questions, or 1 or more of the answers are illogical. COMPETENT The discussion addresses the impact each policy has on the population(s) by logically answering each of the 5 given questions. A4:EVIDENCE THAT INFORMS POLICY NOT EVIDENT A discussion of evidence that informs the policies is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The discussion of the evidence that informs each policy is not logical, or the discussion does not include 2 credible scholarly evidence sources, or 1 or both sources were not published within the last 5 years. COMPETENT The discussion of the evidence that informs each policy is logical, and the discussion is supported by 2 credible scholarly evidence sources that were both published within the last 5 years. A4A:EVIDENCE SUPPORTING POLICY NOT EVIDENT A discussion of whether the evidence from part A4 supports the policies is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The discussion of whether the evidence identified in part A4 supports the policies is illogical, or specific examples are not included. Or the discussion does not include any modifications that should be made to each policy based on the identified evidence, or 1 or more modifications are not reasonably based on the evidence. COMPETENT The discussion of whether the evidence identified in part A4 supports the policies is logical and includes specific examples. The discussion includes any reasonable modifications that should be made to each policy based on the identified evidence. B:ROLE OF THE NURSE IN POLICY DEVELOPMENT NOT EVIDENT The submission does not explain the role of the nurse in policy development. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission does not logically explain the role of the nurse in policy development or provide specific supporting examples. Or the submission does not logically explain how nurses could impact the administration of, or the revision of, a policy at federal or state levels. COMPETENT The submission logically explains the role of the nurse in policy development, including specific supporting examples. The submission logically explains how nurses could impact the administration of, or the revision of, a policy at both federal and state levels. B1:NURSING BARRIERS NOT EVIDENT The submission does not reflect on barriers to the nurse’s engagement. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission reflecting on barriers to the nurse’s engagement does not address 1 or more of the given healthcare policy areas. Or the reflection is not relevant or does not include examples. COMPETENT The submission reflects on barriers to the nurse’s engagement for all 3 of the given healthcare policy areas. The reflection is relevant and includes examples. B2:NURSING ENGAGEMENT NOT EVIDENT The submission does not reflect on ways the candidate will engage in future nursing practice. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission does not reflect on the ways the candidate will engage with healthcare policy in 1 or more of the given areas in future nursing practice. Or any of the given ways to engage are irrelevant to future nursing practice, or the reflection is not supported with specific examples. COMPETENT The submission reflects on the ways the candidate will engage with healthcare policy in all 3 of the given areas in future nursing practice. The given ways to engage are relevant to the future nursing practice, and the reflection is supported with specific examples. C:APA SOURCES NOT EVIDENT The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style. COMPETENT The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style. D:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION NOT EVIDENT Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic. APPROACHING COMPETENCE Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffectiv

Now that you have reviewed the material in this module, reflect on your reactions to what you have read.
In this reflective journal entry, be sure to address each of the following questions:
What is your familiarity with any of the Ayurvedic herbs listed in Table 8.7? Triphala is not listed in the text, however, the posted article suggests it may be effective for various conditions. What are your thoughts on this herb? Triphala article linkDownload Triphala article link
What are your concerns about the issues of toxicity in regard to any herbs?
NOTE: This is a gradable journal. Journal entries MUST be a minimum length of 250 words to receive credit. Each week’s Reflective Journal will include specific journal “prompt” questions, which must be answered directly and specifically and must contain details, examples, and reflection in order to earn the points for the journal. Remember, there is no partial credit for journals.
Why the word count? Because this is a “writing to learn” exercise, where you will explore your thoughts and feelings and work out concerns.
Students are responsible for checking to make sure that posted journal entries actually display in the journal. If there are technical difficulties and your journal or discussion posts do not display correctly after you have posted them, it is your responsibility to notify the instructor before the deadline.

Write a paper that addresses: The financial issues relating to both retaining staff and those associated with recruiting and training new staff when there is high staff turnover. The non-financial costs associate with losing personnel who have many years of experience working in this institution. Recommendations as to what an institution should do to avoid such problems. The benefits associated with adopting those recommendations. Your paper should meet the following structural requirements: Five pages in length, not including the cover sheet and reference page. Formatted according to APA 7th edition standards. Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of four scholarly articles.

Consider some of the arguments related to migration and health.
1.Should public health factor into policy as it relates to migration and that of sanctuary cities?
2.How do intersectional factors impact the care and access to health care that they receive?
3.How does this impact the larger society?
I copy a link to help with answering the questions. Thank you.

In a Microsoft Word document of 4-5 pages formatted in APA style, describe the information collected about a person with a chronic illness. Please note that the title and reference pages should not be included in the total page count of your paper. Identify one person from the illness group you chose in Week 1 to interview. The person should not be a patient at the facility in which you work. You can use friends, family members, or coworkers. Do not use the person’s name in the paper, only initials. Administer the questionnaire you created in Week 1 to that person and address the following: Compile the data and analyze the responses to better illustrate where this person, his or her family, and friends are in relation to accepting the diagnosis in relation to the standard health or illness definitions. The analysis should also include coping skills, treatment, and support aspects of the illness. Explain how this information will direct care plan development for the chosen illness group. Include a copy of the interview you created with the responses from the person interviewed in an Appendix. Support your responses with examples and information from library resources, textbook and lectures. The topic was diabetes …

The article in the link below relates to antimicrobial resistance.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/03/antimicrobial-resistance-superbugs-antibiotics/
Now that you have read the article discuss antimicrobial resistance within a health economic framework whilst considering which absolute key assumption is not being upheld.
Vancouver referencing.