Category: Health Care

Personal and Professional Development
Self-awareness and self-reflection are complementary. One can be reflective (on clients and others) but not truly self-reflective. One can be self-aware in regard to various personal concerns but lack awareness regarding counselor-in-training performance, the counselor-client relationship, and/or the roles one plays in the profession. For this assignment, it is important to take an honest self-assessment regarding advocacy, skill level, theoretical orientation preference and the interventions that align, involvement in profession, ways to increase competence across ethical and cultural standards, and continued personal growth.
Assignment Instructions
You may use the Personal and Professional Development PowerPoint Template (linked in Resources) to structure your presentation.
In a PowerPoint presentation, (minimum of 10 slides), address the following:
Rate your current skill level on a scale of 1–10, 10 being the most competent:
Application of relationship skills and core conditions.
Interview process and assessment skills.
Theoretical orientation and its application.
Identify the steps you can take to enhance your skill level at least two points higher prior to practicum and internship.
Outline your plan for maintaining and enhancing your ethical, legal, and cultural competence now and as a professional counselor. Address the following:
What are the state requirements for licensure renewal in these three areas? (Cite your state association.)
Where are you lacking knowledge and what steps will you use to increase that knowledge? (Consider an article specific to increase professional development.)
Outline your current involvement in a counselor association. Consider the following topics:
How have you grown professionally from involvement?
What steps will you take to enhance service to this association?
Describe current areas of advocacy as part of your professional development. Include a plan for enhancing advocacy skills in your community or profession of counseling with literature support.
Describe the role supervision and consultation play in ongoing personal and professional competence in the following areas. Address both supervision and consultation areas with literature support.
Case conceptualization.
Countertransference.
Unfinished business.
Submit your assignment to the instructor in the assignment area.
Other Requirements
Your assignment should meet the following requirements:
Communication: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, respectful, and consistent with expectations for professional practice in education. Original work and critical thinking are required regarding your assessment and scholarly writing. Your writing must be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Length of presentation: A minimum of 10 slides, with presenter notes or a transcriipt to ensure accessibility to everyone.
Resources: At least five scholarly resources, including your course text or assigned journal articles. Include citations on the final slide of the presentation.
APA guidelines: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and format. When appropriate, use APA-formatted headings.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, appropriate size and weight for presentation, generally 24–28 points for headings and no smaller than 18 points for bullet-point text. For PowerPoint tips, refer to the PowerPoint Presentation library guide linked in the resources.
Resourcesent
Self-awareness and self-reflection are complementary. One can be reflective (on clients and others) but not truly self-reflective. One can be self-aware in regard to various personal concerns but lack awareness regarding counselor-in-training performance, the counselor-client relationship, and/or the roles one plays in the profession. For this assignment, it is important to take an honest self-assessment regarding advocacy, skill level, theoretical orientation preference and the interventions that align, involvement in profession, ways to increase competence across ethical and cultural standards, and continued personal growth.
Assignment Instructions
You may use the Personal and Professional Development PowerPoint Template (linked in Resources) to structure your presentation.
In a PowerPoint presentation, (minimum of 10 slides), address the following:
Rate your current skill level on a scale of 1–10, 10 being the most competent:
Application of relationship skills and core conditions.
Interview process and assessment skills.
Theoretical orientation and its application.
Identify the steps you can take to enhance your skill level at least two points higher prior to practicum and internship.
Outline your plan for maintaining and enhancing your ethical, legal, and cultural competence now and as a professional counselor. Address the following:
What are the state requirements for licensure renewal in these three areas? (Cite your state association.)
Where are you lacking knowledge and what steps will you use to increase that knowledge? (Consider an article specific to increase professional development.)
Outline your current involvement in a counselor association. Consider the following topics:
How have you grown professionally from involvement?
What steps will you take to enhance service to this association?
Describe current areas of advocacy as part of your professional development. Include a plan for enhancing advocacy skills in your community or profession of counseling with literature support.
Describe the role supervision and consultation play in ongoing personal and professional competence in the following areas. Address both supervision and consultation areas with literature support.
Case conceptualization.
Countertransference.
Unfinished business.
Submit your assignment to the instructor in the assignment area.
Other Requirements
Your assignment should meet the following requirements:
Communication: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, respectful, and consistent with expectations for professional practice in education. Original work and critical thinking are required regarding your assessment and scholarly writing. Your writing must be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Length of presentation: A minimum of 10 slides, with presenter notes or a transcriipt to ensure accessibility to everyone.
Resources: At least five scholarly resources, including your course text or assigned journal articles. Include citations on the final slide of the presentation.
APA guidelines: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and format. When appropriate, use APA-formatted headings.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, appropriate size and weight for presentation, generally 24–28 points for headings and no smaller than 18 points for bullet-point text. For PowerPoint tips, refer to the PowerPoint Presentation library guide linked in the resources.
Resources

For this assessment, you will create a 2-4 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach, and review best practices and evidence to address the issue.
As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, your participation and leadership in interdisciplinary teams will be vital to the health outcomes for your patients and organization. One way to approach designing an improvement project is to use the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement describes it thus:
The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is shorthand for testing a change in the real work setting—by planning it, trying it, observing the results, and acting on what is learned. This is the scientific method adapted for action-oriented learning…Essentially, the PDSA cycle helps you test out change ideas on a smaller scale before evaluating the results and making adjustments before potentially launching into a somewhat larger scale project (n.d.).
You might also recognize that the PDSA cycle resembles the nursing process. The benefit of gaining experience with this model of project design is that it provides nurses with an opportunity to ideate and lead improvements. For this assessment, you will not be implementing all of the PDSA cycle. Instead, you are being asked to interview a health care professional of your choice to determine what kind of interdisciplinary problem he or she is experiencing or has experienced in the workplace. This interview, in Assessment 2, will inform the research that you will conduct to propose a plan for interdisciplinary collaboration in Assessment 3.
It would be an excellent choice to complete the PDSA Cycle activity prior to developing the report. The activity consists of four questions that create the opportunity to check your understanding of best practices related to each stage of the PDSA cycle. The information gained from completing this formative will promote your success with the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification report. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.
Reference
Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). How to improve. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx
Demonstration of Proficiency
Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
Describe change theories and a leadership strategy that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Professional Context
This assessment will introduce the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model to create change in an organization. By interviewing a colleague of your choice, you will begin gathering information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing or has experienced. You will identify a change theory and leadership strategies to help solve this problem.
Scenario
This assessment is the first of three related assessments in which you will gather interview information (Assessment 2); design a proposal for interdisciplinary problem-solving, (Assessment 3); and report on how an interdisciplinary improvement plan could be implemented in a place of practice (Assessment 4). At the end of the course, your interviewee will have a proposal plan based on the PDSA cycle that he or she could present to stakeholders to address an interdisciplinary problem in the workplace.
For this assessment, you will need to interview a health care professional such as a fellow learner, nursing colleague, administrator, business partner, or another appropriate person who could provide you with sufficient information regarding an organizational problem that he or she is experiencing or has experienced, or an area where they are seeking improvements. Consult the Interview Guide [DOCX] for an outline of how to prepare and the types of information you will need to complete this project successfully.
Remember: this is just the first in a series of three assessments.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will report on the information that you collected in your interview, analyzing the interview data and identifying a past or current issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary approach. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently being used. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from the literature. Additionally, you will start laying the foundation for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal (Assessment 3) by researching potential change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to issue you have identified. Please be certain to review the scoring guide to confirm specific required elements of this assessment. Note that there are differences between basic, proficient and distinguished scores.
When submitting your plan, use the Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX], which will help you to stay organized and concise. As you complete the template, make sure you use APA format for in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that are informing your plan, as well as for the reference list at the end.
Additionally, be sure to address the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
Describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could inform an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could facilitate establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, and using current APA style.
Additional Requirements
Length of submission: Use the provided template. Most submissions will be 2 to 4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.
Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.

Soap Note 1 “ADULT” Wellness check up Follow the MRU Soap Note Rubric as a guide: Use APA format and must include mia minimum of 2 Scholarly Citations. Soap notes will be uploaded to Moodle and put through TURN-It-In (anti-Plagiarism program) Turn it in’ s Score must be less than 25% or will not be accepted for credit; it must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 25%. Copy-paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated and will receive a grade of 0 (zero) with no resubmissions allowed. Please see College Handbook regarding Academic Misconduct Statement.

Covers chapter 2. Submit your case study here.
Instructions:
a. Provide solutions for the case in roughly two to three pages.
b. Marks will be awarded for a logical approach as well as accurate content.
c. All typed work should be in Times New Roman [font size 12]. All work should be double-spaced.
d. Please use correct APA 7.
e. A minimum of 5 references are required.
f. References should be less than 7 years old and at least 5 peer-reviewed journal articles or reputable websites. Sources like Newspapers, Wikipedia are unacceptable for use as a reference.
g. DO NOT USE QUOTES
h. Similarity index for this assignment is at 20%. Any paper with a similarity index greater than 20% will be penalized, not including honor code or references.
I. Please see the grading rubric for score allotments. All assignments will only be evaluated using the grading rubric. All grades on CANVAS are final.
J. Please submit the assignments in the designated Drop Box in CANVAS. NO other submission method is acceptable.

This week students will continue brainstorming and outlining their potential program. This assignment supports the continued development of process thinking as students will carefully review and obtain a comprehensive understanding of their selected public health issue to appropriately address key issues of the selected problem.
Based on the public health issue your program is planning to address, conduct a review of the literature. Using our library resources, or other scholarly search engines, find various peer-reviewed research articles, epidemiologic research articles, case-studies.
In a three- to four-page essay, provide an overview of the topic, establish, and present your position on the issue, and provide the reader with a comprehensive look at the topic and discussions regarding the subject.
For your paper you need to have at least 5 references (not including the textbook for this course). All references are to be in APA format.
Be sure to outline your paper using the following format:
Background/Definition of your position on the issue: Include brief information/statistics (i.e., important facts to know about the disease and how it has influenced public health actions and society). Provide relevant statistics as well as how the issue relates to the health and well-being of our population. You should briefly discuss how the issue has impacted other public health issues, such as sexual health, mental health, human trafficking.
Summary of peer-reviewed article 1: Discuss and analyze important points discussed by the authors (i.e., why this is important and why we should care).
Summary of peer-reviewed article 2: Discuss and analyze important points discussed by the authors (i.e., why this is important and why we should care).
Summary of peer-reviewed article 3: Discuss and analyze important points discussed by the authors (i.e., why this is important and why we should care).
Summary of peer-reviewed article 4: Discuss and analyze important points discussed by the authors (i.e., why this is important and why we should care).
Summary of peer-reviewed article 5: Discuss and analyze important points discussed by the authors (i.e., why this is important and why we should care).
Conclusion: This summarizing paragraph emphasizes the key point(s) of the papers appraised and key points about the public health issue that warrants the creation of a public health program.
References

I uploaded two word files included the result in 1st semester in 2021-2022 and 1st semester in 2022-2023 about Overall student satisfaction in simulation sessions different subjects in different departments
I need to compare the overall satisfaction percentage between this and previous year.
Note that the EMS is new in this year participated.

Community Support Group Attendance and Reaction – Paper Objectives: Broaden the traditional clinical paradigm to include prevention, early intervention, rehabilitation, and recovery and resilience-oriented approaches to care (ISPN and ANA, 2008) Value patient’s expertise with own health and symptoms (QSEN, Patient Centered-Care, Attitude) Protect patient privacy and confidentiality of patient records and other privileged communications (AACN VIII:8) Tasks All students must independently attend a community support group. Students must independently find a support group in their own or other community to attend. The group must be an “open group” willing to have student participants. Students must adhere to HIPAA confidentiality requirements. A 3-4 page type paper that adheres to APA format. The following statement is required on all written assignments with respect to the Felician University Honor Code. It must be included on the cover page: “I pledge my honor that I have neither given nor received inappropriate aid on this assignment.” All questions below must be answered clearly and comprehensively. This assignment is worth 15% of the course grade. Questions: Refer to your textbook chapters on Settings for Psychiatric Care, Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders, and Therapeutic Groups when answering the following questions: Describe the support group you observed. (What type of group? Who was the facilitator? What were his/her qualifications? What was the make-up of the group? How did you choose/find the group?) What theoretical framework do you think the group was based on? What was the evidence of this? What evidence did you see of group members providing support to each other? What evidence of teaching did you see the group provide? What measures were taken to protect the confidentiality of the group members? If the group was related to addiction, what evidence of enabling behavior did you see? Name and describe two “curative factors” that you observed in the group (refer to your text). Describe your feelings as you observed the group. Turn-It-In Assignment

HOW TO ANSWER

To complete the assignment, you will need to find and attend a community support group related to mental health or addiction. Here’s how you can address each of the questions:

Describe the Support Group:

Provide details about the type of support group you attended (e.g., mental health, addiction recovery, grief support, etc.).
Mention the qualifications of the facilitator, if known.
Explain how you found the group and why you chose it.
Theoretical Framework:

Research and identify the theoretical framework that aligns with the type of support group you attended (e.g., 12-step program for addiction recovery, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for anxiety support groups).
Describe how the group’s activities and discussions align with this framework.
Group Member Support:

Discuss instances where group members provided support to each other during the session.
Provide specific examples or anecdotes that illustrate how members supported each other emotionally, psychologically, or practically.
Teaching within the Group:

Highlight any instances where the group provided educational or informational support.
Describe the topics covered and how they were addressed within the group.
Confidentiality Measures:

Explain the measures taken by the group to protect the confidentiality of its members.
Discuss any confidentiality agreements or rules that were in place.
Enabling Behavior (if applicable):

If the group was related to addiction or substance abuse, describe any evidence of enabling behavior observed.
Provide examples of behaviors or interactions that may perpetuate addiction rather than support recovery.
Curative Factors:

Define and describe two curative factors you observed in the group, referring to your course materials.
Explain how these factors contributed to the group’s therapeutic effectiveness.
Personal Reflection:

Share your feelings and thoughts as you observed the support group.
Discuss your emotional reactions, insights gained, and any personal takeaways from the experience.
Remember to adhere to APA format for your paper, including proper citation of sources. Additionally, ensure that you respect the privacy and confidentiality of the support group members and obtain any necessary permissions to share their experiences in your assignment.

THE DISEASE YOU WRITE ON IS HASHIMOTO DISEASE
Now that you understand your assigned diagnosis from a biomedical viewpoint, It’s time to deepen your understanding of It from the voices of those who live with It. To do so, you will need to find 5 open-access illness experience sites (I.e., social support sites, Reddit, blogs, Tiktok users, Instagram users, etc.) to inform your understanding of what it is like living with your diagnosis. Once you have gathered the information, you will write a 2-page paper describing the most common subjective experiences of living with your diagnosis. You will need to accurately cite (in APA format) the people/platforms you are referencing.
PLEASE FOLLOW THE TEMPLATE ATTACHED

Please see attached instructions and grading rubric. In the instructions, when asked for a specific area of interest or specific skills to discuss, I have included those I prefer to be used at the end of the statement. Also attached is the weblink for the AHIMA Code of Ethics Principles, as well as tips for the paper.

INSTRUCTIONS: Using the Graduate Outcomes table of Fink’s Significant Learning begin to construct your doctoral plan looking at foundational knowledge, application, integration, human dimension, learning how to learn, and caring. This chart will guide the construction of your completed doctoral plan, which will have different goals listed in each of the boxes of the chart. We provided you our overall educational goals for the program, now you need to develop your goals for the 6 areas of learning according to Fink with regard to the graduate outcome: leaders in occupational therapy practice through entrepreneurship, academia or research.
FOR CONTEXT: this program is a Doctorate in Occupational Therapy program where we complete a doctoral research project. Please review attached info. Picture of the start of an example chart included as well. Template is attached. Please fill in directly into chart.
I also provided an example of what this should look like. Note, the example is using a different goal but should give you an idea of format/content. Thank you.