Category: Health Care

Critical Thinking Assignment: Analyze a Research Paper Read the following article: Basri, R., Issrani, R., Hua Gan, S., Prabhu, N., & Khursheed Alam, M. (2021). Burden of stroke in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A soaring epidemic. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 29(3), 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.02.002 Watch the following video: Steve Kirk (2020, May 3). The Structure of Scientific Research Papers YouTube. https://youtu.be/BAS9I4tFgV8 Write a paper that addresses each of the following: What information is reported in the abstract? What theoretical foundation was identified in the research? What is the motivation and scope of the study? Explain the research methods used. What gaps and implications did the researchers identify? What do the researchers include in the conclusions? How do the researchers indicate they have acted appropriately while conducting the study? Explain the research process and its importance in furthering knowledge in the field of healthcare. Your paper should meet the following requirements: Be three to four pages in length, not including the title or reference pages. Each question or reflection should be answered with at least one paragraph of text discussing your findings. Cite the article and video in the text of your answer and list both sources of the reference page. Be formatted according to Saudi Electronic University and APA writing guidelines. Follow APA writing standards.

ANSWER

Title: Critical Analysis of Research Paper – Burden of Stroke in Saudi Arabia

Abstract:
The abstract of the research paper “Burden of Stroke in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Soaring Epidemic” provides a concise summary of the study’s purpose, methods, key findings, and implications. It mentions that stroke is a significant public health concern in Saudi Arabia, emphasizes the importance of understanding its burden, and highlights the study’s objectives and methods. The abstract also outlines the study’s major findings, emphasizing the growing burden of stroke in the country, and suggests the need for effective interventions.

Theoretical Foundation:
The research paper does not explicitly mention a specific theoretical foundation. However, it is grounded in the broader theoretical framework of epidemiology and public health research. The study aims to investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and trends of stroke in Saudi Arabia, which aligns with the principles of epidemiological research.

Motivation and Scope:
The motivation behind the study is to address the increasing burden of stroke in Saudi Arabia and its implications for public health and healthcare resources. The scope of the research encompasses a comprehensive analysis of stroke epidemiology, risk factors, and trends in Saudi Arabia. The study aims to provide valuable insights into the magnitude of the problem and its potential consequences.

Research Methods:
The researchers employed a retrospective cross-sectional study design using data from the Saudi Ministry of Health’s records. They conducted a thorough analysis of hospital admissions and reported cases of stroke over a specific period. Statistical methods, including descriptive statistics and regression analysis, were used to assess the prevalence, risk factors, and trends of stroke in the country.

Gaps and Implications:
The researchers identified several gaps and implications in their study. They noted a significant increase in the burden of stroke in Saudi Arabia, with a rising number of cases and hospital admissions. This trend suggests a need for enhanced stroke prevention and management strategies. The study also revealed specific risk factors associated with stroke, emphasizing the importance of targeted interventions to reduce these risks.

Conclusions:
In the conclusions, the researchers summarize their findings, highlighting the alarming increase in the burden of stroke in Saudi Arabia. They emphasize the need for urgent public health interventions, including awareness campaigns, risk factor management, and improved access to stroke care services. The study concludes by stressing the importance of addressing the soaring epidemic of stroke to mitigate its impact on the healthcare system and society.

Appropriate Research Conduct:
The research paper adheres to ethical and methodological standards throughout the study. It acknowledges the use of data from the Saudi Ministry of Health and appropriately cites the sources. The study’s methodology and data analysis are transparent, allowing for replication and validation of the results. The research also includes ethical considerations in discussing the implications of its findings, emphasizing the importance of addressing the stroke burden in Saudi Arabia.

Research Process and Importance:
The research process in this study involves data collection, analysis, and interpretation to understand the burden of stroke in Saudi Arabia. It is essential in furthering knowledge in the field of healthcare as it provides critical insights into a growing public health issue. By identifying the prevalence, risk factors, and trends associated with stroke, this research contributes valuable information for policymakers, healthcare providers, and researchers to develop targeted interventions and strategies to combat the rising epidemic.

References:
Basri, R., Issrani, R., Hua Gan, S., Prabhu, N., & Khursheed Alam, M. (2021). Burden of stroke in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A soaring epidemic. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 29(3), 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.02.002

Steve Kirk (2020, May 3). The Structure of Scientific Research Papers [YouTube Video]. https://youtu.be/BAS9I4tFgV8

Information gathered from internal audits of your facility reveal patients are not utilizing the patient portal. Develop a patient portal marketing flyer for your facility describing, explaining, and demonstrating how the clinic’s patient portal will improve patient access, care, and quality.
Part 1: Create a patient portal flyer using any software such as Word, Canva, etc. (for Canva you will need to create a free account).
Review Health IT Playbook Patient Engagement
Part 2: Describe the benefits of the patient portal to the patient and indicate how the patient portal is integrated to the EHR and health information exchange (HIE).
Review Interactive Tool for Developing and Using a Mobile App in Healthcare. https://www.healthit.gov/playbook/pe/introduction/
Review a Patient Portal App that utilizes FHIR
https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/mobile-health-apps-interactive-tool
View the following videos:
https://gallery.smarthealthit.org/app/paxeramed-portal
FHIR:
Standards and Regulations
Part 3: Explain how to create an account and how to log in. Take into consideration the concepts of technical and health literacy of your patients. Provide a QR code linking patients to HIPAA regulations and patient rights.
Part 4: After your flyer has been designed, create a brief plan for your facility related to the future creation of a mobile app for your patient portal. Discuss the regulations and rules that apply. Explain API’s and FHIR. This should be 1 page in length submitted in a Word Document using at least two references in APA format.

Both the Lochner and Jacobson cases dealt with the constitutionality of state laws intended to protect the health of state residents.
Considering each case separately, do you agree or disagree with the US Supreme Court ruling and why?

Discuss how physician malpractice suits can be decreased. How can a doctor be sued for malpractice? What current practices do doctors perform in order to avoid law suits? What are the impacts of these practices? How can one check for any malpractice suit against a doctor?

1-1 Discussion: Beginning Project Research: Public Health Organization Identification
Subscribe

In this discussion, begin by introducing yourself to the class and share your background. Discuss why you are pursuing a degree in public health and what your plans are following graduation.
Next, review the shortlist of resources included in the Public Health Issue Data Checklist PDF and the example public health organization and issues for potential exploration in your final project. In choosing an organization, be sure that it relates to the particular community (preferably your own) that you have chosen and that you can contact someone within the organization. You will be required to describe the organization and the policy or program you chose to evaluate in Milestone One, with supporting evidence. Thus, you are expected to spend the next two weeks locating and reviewing data sources for your evaluation.
In your initial post, address the following:
Identify the community you live in or one you wish to work with.
Describe two to three organizations that you are interested in investigating within your chosen community. Remember that you will need to contact the organization to set up a meeting to interview an administrator for your journal in Module Two. You may want to reach two or three organizations to be sure one gets back to you in a timely fashion
Provide a set of resources that provide data and other information on at least two organizations and the issues they address. Identify the location of data and a description of what kind of data it contains. For example, if you choose your local food bank, then you would want to locate data on:
Food insecurity in your community, percentage of food insecurity, demographics of the community (age distribution, location of grocery stores, cost, etc.)
Who and how many people the food bank serves. You may use data from government sites, such as state.gov sites and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
In responding to your peers, offer feedback on their proposed issue selection. Do you have any helpful recommendations or perspectives to provide? Are there any areas in their post that are unclear? Offer plausible solutions based on your own research or experience, including what you may have seen within your own community.
To complete this assignment, review the Capstone Discussion Rubric PDF document.

Some of the most important legal-ethical dilemmas I would like to expand on are the right to patient autonomy and informed consent. In my nursing experience I have come across many patient situations where family members have withheld pertinent information from the patient due to a terminal diagnosis. The information is withheld due to the fear of harm that it may psychologically cause the patient to know the truth about their diagnosis. As a Registered Nurse, I honestly felt I did not need to gain such an in depth understanding of the laws and ethics regarding withholding information, however, as a future Nurse Practitioner (NP) I feel it is important to under the ethics regarding this issue as it is commonly come across in practice. Withholding patient information at the request of family members goes against patient autonomy and placed the provider in an ethical dilemma by not telling the truth. According to the American Medical Association Code of Medical Ethics withholding any patient information is ethically unacceptable unless it is during an emergency situation where the patient is incapacitated and unable to provide informed consent (AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, 2012). Informed consent specifies that the patient has the right to make decisions about their own care after the provider has given enough information including therapeutic alternatives and risks to a patient that is in capacity to make their own decisions (AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, 2012). Nurse Practitioners play a pivotal role in engaging patients to shared decision-making and respect for patient autonomy. The ethical dilemma in this situation is that if a patient is able to make decisions for themselves, yet is having information withheld from family, how would they be able to make the appropriate decision for care or even be involved in their own treatment. Patient right is also a federal law under title 482 section 13 it states the patient has the right to be present in the development and application of their plan of care (Federal Registrar, 2023). On the other hand, there can be circumstances where information may be withheld from a patient if providing information would cause an incapacitating emotional distress or serious physical termed therapeutic privilege (Menon et al., 2021). Respect for patient autonomy is a basic patient right and is instilled in every Advanced Practice Nurse (APN). It is important to discuss this dilemma as we may be faced with a similar patient situation during our career. Being knowledgeable of the ethics and laws regarding withholding patient information can help avoid any internal conflicts as a practitioner. The issues regarding patient autonomy and informed consent can sometimes have grey areas for NP’s since most laws and ethics regard the patient-physician relationship, not necessarily specifying the patient- APN relationship or considering the APN in law. I feel this is an area that needs to be discussed further or have more information available in involving APNs and the role they play in this discussion. The best advice I would give to a NP going through a similar situation would be to always do what is right based on the principles of ethics and approach the situation as a multi-disciplinary team. Involve others when in doubt, even if the issue must reach an ethics committee, but do not brush off the situation as it can have serious consequences for patients’ autonomy and involvement in their own care. In previous situations that I have seen, physicians did not take the situation seriously or exercised the “therapeutic privilege” even if it did not apply to the situation, however, NP’s have a different point of perspective and I believe they can shed light on this ethical dilemma. References AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. (2012, July 1). AMA code of Medical Ethics’ Opinions on Informing Patients. Journal of Ethics | American Medical Association. Retrieved February 2, 2023, from https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/ama-code-medical-ethics-opinions-informing-patients/2012-07#:~:text=Withholding%20medical%20information%20from%20patients,before%20the%20information%20becomes%20available. Federal Registrar. (2023, February 1). Part 482 – Conditions of Participation for Hospitals . Code of Federal Regulations: A point in time eCFR system. Retrieved February 2, 2023, from https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/chapter-IV/subchapter-G/part-482 Menon, S., Entwistle, V., Campbell, A. V., & van Delden, J. J. (2021). How Should the ‘Privilege’ in Therapeutic Privilege Be Conceived When Considering the Decision-Making Process for Patients with Borderline Capacity? Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(1), 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105792

APA annotated bibliography on electronic medical records, patient portals, predictive analytics, healthcare apps, or health information exchanges. 200-300 words with three annotated references

I uploaded two word files included the result in 1st semester in 2021-2022 and 1st semester in 2022-2023 about Overall student satisfaction in simulation sessions different subjects in different departments
I need to compare the overall satisfaction percentage between this and previous year.
Note that the EMS is new in this year participated.

Exam Content
Accountability is important to research, and the implications are especially important to health care research. Researchers must act with integrity and apply high standards of ethical behavior in their research. You must understand that your judgement and actions help shape research not only due to what you include in it, but also due to what you omit from a study.
Effective research begins with reviewing the literature. In this annotated bibliography assignment, you will demonstrate your skill in accountability as you evaluate the impact of legal and regulatory requirements on health care research, in addition to those impacts on the delivery of health care.
Assignment Preparation
Access Locate Peer-Reviewed / Scholarly Materials on the Week 2 University Library page to review and watch the videos about how to find articles.

Search the University Library for peer-reviewed research articles related to the impact of legal and regulatory requirements in health care. Incorporate the following requirements:
Choose research articles that describe a research study, not an editorial or brief.
Prioritize research studies based in the United States from 2010 to present day.
Select health topics of interest to you or your job, with no complex statistical analyses.

Select at least 4 peer-reviewed research articles to use to complete an annotated bibliography. The 4 peer-reviewed research articles can be based on the same or different topics, provided there is focus on the legal and regulatory requirements in health care.
Follow these instructions to review the Sample Annotated Bibliography:
Visit the Center for Writing Excellence.
Access the APA Templates and Samples section.
Select “Sample Annotated Bibliography.”
Assignment Directions
Prepare an annotated bibliography of the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you selected from the University Library. For each of the 4 peer-reviewed research articles:
Write a 200-word summary (minimum) in your own words of each research article.
Describe the major areas of the research article, such as the sample, geographic location, and the outcome. Remember, annotations must not include any direct quotes or in-text citations.
Explain the legal or regulatory impact of the research study described in the research article.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.
Submit your assignment.

Objective: Exploring how climate change is contributing to the spread of emerging infectious disease. Climate change influences the emergence and spread of many infectious diseases. For example, changes in weather patterns can influence the population of rodents and other animal hosts that can spread disease to humans. Changes in rainfall can influence the availability of clean water and food supplies, thereby increasing the incidence of diseases transmitted via human and animal wastes. Changes in temperature and rainfall also influence the incidence of vector borne diseases, including diseases spread by mosquitoes.
Multimedia: Silent Spring Series: Global Climate Change and Emerging Infectious Disease. University of California Television (UCTV).
Global Climate Change and Emerging Infectious Disease with Stanley Maloy – The Silent Spring Series Links “https://youtu.be/hfnv5oX2OOk”
. San Diego State’s Stanley Maloy presents the direct and indirect consequences of climate change that are shifting the habitats of animals and plants, increasing the spread of infectious diseases, and altering the availability of clean water and food supplies.
Questions to Answer/Discuss:
Besides extreme weather events, climate change also impacts air pollution, vector ecology, water and food supplies, and environmental degradation.
What types of human diseases can climate change cause by impacting these factors described? Explain your answer and give reasons for why the disease will be increased due to the climate change impacts.
The Developing World Pays for the Failures of the Industrialized Nations. Scarcity of key resources, including water, could exacerbate tensions between ethnic groups, countries and regions as they compete for, and adjust to, different environments and resources. What ideas do you have for preparing for disasters such as drought that can lead to famine and how to handle “environmental refugees” who from the forced migrations of displaced? Explain whether your ideas are preventive or do they just treat the symptoms of climate change.
Climate change has affected vector ecology and the spread of infectious diseases even here in the US. The British company Oxitec wants to hold its first U.S. trial of genetically modified mosquitoes in the Florida Keys. The plan is to release about 3 million male mosquitoes that have been engineered to produce offspring that die young and can’t reproduce. These genetically modified organisms (GMO) would reduce the population of mosquitoes that transmit dengue, chikungunya or Zika viruses. Do you think this is a viable option for solving the increase in diseases from climate change? Explain your reasons for your answer.
Additional Resources:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3785720/