Category: Health Care

Please see pages 2,3,7,8,10 that needs correction. I have put some comment at the side base of my instructor’s comment.
My instructor one biggest thing is to get more specific
Fix the Aim statement and the goal. It could just be one intervention
For example I will be doing an educational teaching with my collage (Please describe the setting which is a mental health outpatient clinic with psychiatrist and individual therapists and social worker), assess pre knowledge of what I am going to do and post knowledge -Let narrow the age group to 5 to 19yrs
The goal is to reduced frequent ER visit and hospitalization.
Let setting be limited to outpatient clinic, take out the primary care settings
What the educational training is, pre and post knowledge test and survey
Please use newer literatures and citations.
These below are some kids and are giver concerns in my day to day practice that create communication barrier increasing SI behavior
-I can’t talk to my mom because she will dismiss my feeling
-I don’t want to get my parent upset because they don’t understand
-I am scare to call the crisis hot line or 911 because I feel I will be taking away from my parents.
-Parents says, I don’t think she is suicidal, I think she wants attention
-Parents why is she suicidal when she has everything good going for her as a child

Guideline for the Health Informatics Project Option 2:
Information Flow and Workflow Analysis for Promoting Interoperability:
Electronic Clinical Quality Measures
Assignment Descriiption:
For this option of health informatics project, you must investigate and analyze the CURRENT
information flow and workflow related to THREE electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs)
data for meaningful use of an electronic health record (EHR) in YOUR PRACTICE AREA. You
will need to write a 10-15 page paper in a scholarly manner (excluding title, abstract, reference,
and table or graph pages).
Objectives of this Assignment:
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) encourage eligible clinicians, eligible
hospitals, and CAHs to adopt and meaningfully use certified EHR technology through the
Promoting Interoperability Programs (https://www.healthit.gov/topic/meaningful-use-and-
macra/promoting-interoperability). eCQMs are tools that help measure and track the quality of
health care services provided by eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals (EHs), and critical
access hospitals (CAHs) in the health care system. These measures use data associated with
health care providers’ ability to deliver high-quality care or relate to long-term goals for quality
health care (CMS, 2020).
The purpose of this assignment is for you to explore the information flow and workflow related to
eCQMs data for meaningful use of EHRs. You will be able to (1) identify and select some
eCQMs reporting requirement for the EHR Incentive Program, (2) investigate and analyze the
information flow and workflow related to the three selected CQMs in your practice area, (3)
create an activity and sequence diagram to provide a visual cue, and (4) identify and discuss the
needs of the process improvements and system improvements.
Suggested Steps for the Project:
1. Review the basics of eCQMs at https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-
Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/ClinicalQualityMeasures
2. Review CQMs reporting requirements and select three CQMs that you’d like to investigate. You
can pick them up from either the set for Eligible Professional (EP) or the set for Eligible Hospital
(EH). But you need to select all three CQMs from the same set.
➢ Please use resources in the following links: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-
Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/eCQM_Library.html (you can find the
relevant tables in the list on this page)
3. Investigate and analyze the information flow and workflow related to your selected CQMs in
your practice area. You would need to address how the data and information pertaining to
CQMs are collected, aligned, integrated, communicated, and utilized for tracking daily operations
in your facility, based on 6 Ws. You would need to address the following questions for your
analysis:
• What are the various sources of input to the process of CQMs (paper, people, information
systems, etc.)?
• Who documents the CQMs, how and where?
• Once documented, who needs the information next, and for what purpose? How do the next
people in the chain of the workflow process know they should be aware of the CQM
Created by Dr. Mikyoung Lee, 2015, Updated 2016-2021 Page 2 of 3
information (someone shows up? a phone call is made? Something appears on their computer
screen?)
• What methods (forms or information systems) are involved in the transfer of data from one
person/department to the next?
• How is the data aggregated? Where is the data stored?
• How is the data used and reported by whom (clinicians, QI department, administrators, etc.)?
• How does your organization review and utilize the reported data?
• How does your organization manage the CQMs data to ensure the following properties:
accuracy, reliability, integrity, timeliness, security, and confidentiality?
4. Create an activity and sequence diagram to provide a visual cue by using any drawing tool (e.g.,
Edraw (use ‘try it free’ version, https://www.edrawsoft.com/), Word flowchart (tutorial video),
Excel flowchart (tutorial video) or Visio (expensive, but you may want to subscribe it for one
month only ($15), tutorial video). Be sure to use the correct symbols for documents, data,
database, data storage, transfer path, decision points, and endpoints.
5. Based on the diagram, describe the needs of the process improvements and system improvements.
6. Write the paper in a scholarly manner (APA 7th format)
7. Referencing in the APA format. (If you are thinking of publishing your work, you may search
which journal might have published a similar topic, using the following search engine (
http://www.biosemantics.org/jane/). You should list all resources in an appropriate and consistent
manner. It would be good to use library management tools (e.g., Mendeley, RefWorks, or
EndNote) so that you can easily transform the referencing styles up to different requirements of
journals; each has an automatics transformation function to change the referencing style).
Guideline for Writing Your Project Paper (maximum potential points per evaluation item)
✓ Submit the paper according to the APA 7th edition style guide
✓ Write a 10-15 page paper (excluding title, abstract, reference, and table or graph pages).
1. Title (1 point)
Should be specific to your focused eCQMs
2. Abstract & Keywords (4 points)
Provide a 200-250 word abstract and three keywords
3. Background (5 points)
Provide briefly background of the Meaningful Use rules of EHRs and the CMS Promoting
Interoperability Program. Provide general information about CQMs and their reporting
requirements. (Recommended length: 1 page)
4. Three CQMS and their Significance (5 points)
List three CQMs that you selected and their significance. The introduction sets out the context and
reasons for why your selected CQMs are so important. You might indicate the prevalence of the
problem/issue (including prevalence statistics), its relevance or cost, its importance to theory,
knowledge gaps (the relative absence of knowledge), some contradictory research, a new
perspective of immediate interest, etc. Secondary sources (books, chapters, or review/commentary
articles) or tertiary sources (newspapers, magazine articles) can be helpful in making the
introduction. However, do not rely on tertiary sources to make your introduction. (Recommended
length: 1-2 pages)
5. Descriiptions of the Information Flow and Workflow of the CQMs (50 points = Narratives
(25 points) + the diagrams (25 points))
Provide and organize descriiptions of the results from analyses of the information and workflow
PER CQM. Also, provide three diagrams (one per CQM). You can provide one diagram for all
three CQMs as well, but you should very clearly depict distinguishable process flows if there
are. (Recommended length: 6-7 pages, excluding the Figure page(s) for diagram(s))Created by Dr. Mikyoung Lee, 2015, Updated 2016-2021 Page 2 of 3
information (someone shows up? a phone call is made? Something appears on their computer
screen?)
• What methods (forms or information systems) are involved in the transfer of data from one
person/department to the next?
• How is the data aggregated? Where is the data stored?
• How is the data used and reported by whom (clinicians, QI department, administrators, etc.)?
• How does your organization review and utilize the reported data?
• How does your organization manage the CQMs data to ensure the following properties:
accuracy, reliability, integrity, timeliness, security, and confidentiality?
4. Create an activity and sequence diagram to provide a visual cue by using any drawing tool (e.g.,
Edraw (use ‘try it free’ version, https://www.edrawsoft.com/), Word flowchart (tutorial video),
Excel flowchart (tutorial video) or Visio (expensive, but you may want to subscribe it for one
month only ($15), tutorial video). Be sure to use the correct symbols for documents, data,
database, data storage, transfer path, decision points, and endpoints.
5. Based on the diagram, describe the needs of the process improvements and system improvements.
6. Write the paper in a scholarly manner (APA 7th format)
7. Referencing in the APA format. (If you are thinking of publishing your work, you may search
which journal might have published a similar topic, using the following search engine (
http://www.biosemantics.org/jane/). You should list all resources in an appropriate and consistent
manner. It would be good to use library management tools (e.g., Mendeley, RefWorks, or
EndNote) so that you can easily transform the referencing styles up to different requirements of
journals; each has an automatics transformation function to change the referencing style).
Guideline for Writing Your Project Paper (maximum potential points per evaluation item)
✓ Submit the paper according to the APA 7th edition style guide
✓ Write a 10-15 page paper (excluding title, abstract, reference, and table or graph pages).
1. Title (1 point)
Should be specific to your focused eCQMs
2. Abstract & Keywords (4 points)
Provide a 200-250 word abstract and three keywords
3. Background (5 points)
Provide briefly background of the Meaningful Use rules of EHRs and the CMS Promoting
Interoperability Program. Provide general information about CQMs and their reporting
requirements. (Recommended length: 1 page)
4. Three CQMS and their Significance (5 points)
List three CQMs that you selected and their significance. The introduction sets out the context and
reasons for why your selected CQMs are so important. You might indicate the prevalence of the
problem/issue (including prevalence statistics), its relevance or cost, its importance to theory,
knowledge gaps (the relative absence of knowledge), some contradictory research, a new
perspective of immediate interest, etc. Secondary sources (books, chapters, or review/commentary
articles) or tertiary sources (newspapers, magazine articles) can be helpful in making the
introduction. However, do not rely on tertiary sources to make your introduction. (Recommended
length: 1-2 pages)
5. Descriiptions of the Information Flow and Workflow of the CQMs (50 points = Narratives
(25 points) + the diagrams (25 points))
Provide and organize descriiptions of the results from analyses of the information and workflow
PER CQM. Also, provide three diagrams (one per CQM). You can provide one diagram for all
three CQMs as well, but you should very clearly depict distinguishable process flows if there
are. (Recommended length: 6-7 pages, excluding the Figure page(s) for diagram(s))
Created by Dr. Mikyoung Lee, 2015, Updated 2016-2021 Page 3 of 3
6. Discussion (20 points)
Please describe the needs of the process improvements and system improvements. Write
suggestions for 1) data creators (clinicians), 2) data managers (IT staff), and 3) data users
(clinicians, administrators, etc.). (Recommended length: 1-2 pages)
7. Conclusion (5 points)
Please make a brief note on your lessons from this project. (Recommended length: ½-1 page)
8. References (5 points)
You should contain accurate in-text citations as well as complete and correct references. Please
ensure that all citations are complete before submission and are no more than 5 years old.
9. APA formatting (5 points)

Assignment Directions:
Imagine that you are the director for a health care facility and you are tasked with leading the facility in converting their office to electronic health records. For this assignment, you will design a flowchart that outlines how you would use the system development life cycle to implement electronic health records. You will present this flowchart to other stakeholders in the organization to explain the business processes that will take place with the conversion. Please include the following information in your flowchart:
● Create a flowchart outlining how you would use the phases in the system development life cycle to implement electronic health records in a healthcare facility.
● The flowchart should include the 5 phases of the systems development life cycle.
● Within the flowchart, provide an explanation of how you will use each phase to implement an electronic health record.
● Within the flowchart, provide at least 2 examples of activities that would take place for each phase of the system development life cycle.
A System Development Life Cycle template has been provided to help you get started. You may also use any other software that you would like to create your flowchart (i.e., Canva).
Requirements:
This assignment should follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.). Your writing should be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful. The resources used (including your text) should be properly cited. Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics.

To lead a healthcare team, you need to inspire your team to live out your organization’s mission, vision, and values.
Please review and complete each section in both part one and two of the attached document. Please also review and adhere to the attached rubric.
In part one of the course project, focus on finding your organization’s mission, vision, and values, along with defining your own values and the goals and values of your team. Part two of the course project builds on those efforts by asking you to evaluate yourself and your team against team goals, and to incorporate your goals into hiring and handling progressive discipline.
My chosen organization is the Kenya Red Cross. please use the organization’s website to help you fill out the questions that pertain to an organization.
For section 2 in part one that asks you to interview coworkers you can make up individuals and write whatever.

Chuck, an independent truck driver with diabetes, had to make a tough choice when he was informed that his insurance plan would no longer cover the brand of insulin, Humalog, that he had used for 17 years to control his type 1 diabetes. The change was precipitated by a spike in the price of Humalog — a 290 percent cost increase over ten years. As a result, Humalog was taken off the insurance company’s formulary, causing Chuck’s copayment for a 90-day supply of the drug to increase almost threefold to $500. As he appealed the sudden and costly change in coverage, he decreased his dose of Humalog. Lacking the insulin he needed, Chuck became so sick that he had to go to the emergency room several times with dangerously high blood sugar levels. Being ill made it difficult for Chuck to continue driving, which covered his income, making it even more difficult for him to buy insulin.
Please answer the following questions.
1. How do increases in drug costs affect patients?
2. Why does taking a drug off a formulary increase the prices to the consumer?
3. What should Chuck do?
Please use other references/resources in addition to the following book, Healthcare in the United States: Clinical, Financial, and Operational Dimensions by Stephen L. Watson and Kenneth L. Johnson.
***Please use two supporting resources in each paragraph.
***Please use the following document as a reference for the paper’s format and requirements.

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt). A. Examine a healthcare organization that has significance to you, using the American Hospital Directory (AHD) and the Care Compare websites found in the Web Links section, and complete the following: 1. Identify the healthcare organization you selected from the AHD by name and location. 2. Explain why you chose the healthcare organization in part A1 and any significance the organization has to you, including specific examples. 3. Describe (suggested length 1–2 paragraphs) the healthcare organization from A1 and the “type of facility” it is, according to AHD website, and the types of services this kind of facility typically provides. a. Explain what the “type of control”, according to AHD website, means for this healthcare organization identified in part A1 and how it informs the services typically provided at this healthcare organization. 4. Discuss the facility’s Overall Star Rating from the Care Compare website and identify how the Star Rating is measured. If the facility does not have an Overall Star Rating explain why. a. Identify one credible additional source of quality data on healthcare organizations. 5. Discuss two organizational ethics that are reflected in the type of facility and the type of control listed for this organization, including specific examples. 6. Discuss the nurse’s role in fiscal responsibility for this type of organization related to value-based care, including specific examples. 7. Describe one healthcare organizational change that could improve the delivery of value-based healthcare for the healthcare organization from part A1. B. Compare the financial structure and data of the healthcare organization you discussed in part A with another organization listed on the AHD and Care Compare websites that is within the same or an adjacent state, including specific examples from each healthcare organization. 1. Discuss which healthcare organization from part B is more aligned with value-based healthcare, including one scholarly evidence source published within the last five years to support the discussion. 2. Discuss which healthcare organization from part B is more supportive of equitable patient-centered care, including one scholarly evidence source published within the last five years to support the discussion. 3. Discuss one financial and one quality data source that could inform organizational transformation in any healthcare organization. C. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. RUBRIC A1:HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATION SIGNIFICANCE NOT EVIDENT The submission does not identify a healthcare facility. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission is missing the healthcare facility’s name or location, or the organization is not selected from the AHD website. COMPETENT The submission identifies the healthcare facility by the organization’s name and location, and the organization is selected from the AHD website. A2:SIGNIFICANCE OF FACILITY NOT EVIDENT The submission does not explain why the healthcare organization identified in part A1 was chosen. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission does not explain the significance the organization has to the learner, or the submission is not supported with specific examples. COMPETENT The submission explains why the healthcare organization identified in part A1 was chosen and any significance it has to the learner, and the submission is supported with specific examples. A3:TYPE OF FACILITY NOT EVIDENT A description of the organization from part A1 is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission does not accurately describe the organization identified in part A1 or does not include the “type of facility” it is. Or the description does not accurately include the types of services typically provided at this kind of organization. COMPETENT The submission accurately describes the organization identified in part A1, including the “type of facility” it is and the types of services typically provided at this kind of organization. A3A:TYPE OF CONTROL NOT EVIDENT The submission does not explain the “type of control” for the healthcare organization identified in part A1. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission does not provide a logical explanation of what “type of control” means for the healthcare organization identified in part A1. Or the submission does not logically explain how the “type of control” informs the services typically provided at this healthcare organization. COMPETENT The submission provides a logical explanation of what “type of control” means for the healthcare organization identified in part A1 and how the specific “type of control” informs the services typically provided at this healthcare organization. A4:OVERALL STAR RATING NOT EVIDENT The submission does not discuss the Overall Star Rating or identify any relevant measures of the Star Rating for the healthcare organization from part A1. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission does not logically discuss the organization’s Overall Star Rating or what this rating means for the healthcare organization from part A1. Or the submission does not correctly identify the relevant measures used to generate the Star Rating. COMPETENT The submission logically discusses the organization’s Overall Star Rating and what this rating means for the healthcare organization from part A1. The submission correctly identifies all relevant measures used to generate the Star Rating. A4A:SOURCE OF QUALITY DATA NOT EVIDENT The submission does not identify 1 additional source of quality data on healthcare organizations. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission identifies 1 additional source of quality data on healthcare organizations, but the chosen source is not credible. COMPETENT The submission identifies 1 credible additional source of quality data on healthcare organizations. A5:ORGANIZATIONAL ETHICS NOT EVIDENT The submission does not discuss any organizational ethics reflected in the “type of facility” and “type of control” listed for the chosen organization. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission discusses only 1 of the organizational ethics, or 1 or both of the ethics are not reflected in the “type of facility” or “type of control” listed for this organization. Or 1 or both ethics discussed are not plausible. Or the discussion does not provide specific examples of how both ethics are reflected in the organization. COMPETENT The submission discusses 2 plausible organizational ethics that are reflected in the type of facility and type of control listed for the chosen organization. Both ethics are plausible, and the discussion provides specific examples of how both ethics are reflected in the organization. A6:NURSING ROLE IN VALUE-BASED CARE NOT EVIDENT The submission does not discuss the nurse’s role in fiscal responsibility. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission does not present a logical discussion of the nurse’s role in fiscal responsibility for this type of organization. Or the nursing role discussed is not related to value-based care, or the discussion does not provide specific examples. COMPETENT The submission presents a logical discussion of the nurse’s role in fiscal responsibility for this type of organization as related to value-based care, and the discussion provides specific examples. A7:ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE FOR VALUE-BASED HEALTHCARE NOT EVIDENT A description of 1 healthcare organizational change that could improve the delivery of value-based healthcare is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The description of 1 healthcare organizational change that could improve the delivery of value-based healthcare is irrelevant or implausible for the healthcare organization from part A1. COMPETENT The description of 1 healthcare organizational change that could improve the delivery of value-based healthcare for the healthcare organization from part A1 is relevant and plausible. B:COMPARE FINANCIAL STRUCTURES NOT EVIDENT A comparison of the financial structures and data of the healthcare organization from part A and another organization is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE The comparison of the financial structures and data of the organization discussed in part A and a second healthcare organization is inaccurate or illogical. Or the comparison does not include the name or location of the second healthcare organization, or the location is not within the same or an adjacent state. Or the comparison does not include specific examples from each healthcare organization’s financial structure. COMPETENT The comparison of the financial structure

Critical Thinking Assignment: Analyze a Research Paper Read the following article: Basri, R., Issrani, R., Hua Gan, S., Prabhu, N., & Khursheed Alam, M. (2021). Burden of stroke in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A soaring epidemic. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 29(3), 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2021.02.002 Watch the following video: Steve Kirk (2020, May 3). The Structure of Scientific Research Papers YouTube. https://youtu.be/BAS9I4tFgV8 Write a paper that addresses each of the following: What information is reported in the abstract? What theoretical foundation was identified in the research? What is the motivation and scope of the study? Explain the research methods used. What gaps and implications did the researchers identify? What do the researchers include in the conclusions? How do the researchers indicate they have acted appropriately while conducting the study? Explain the research process and its importance in furthering knowledge in the field of healthcare.
HOW TO ANSWER
What information is reported in the abstract?
The abstract of the research paper “Burden of stroke in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A soaring epidemic” by Basri et al. (2021) provides a brief summary of the study, including its motivation, methods, findings, and conclusions.
The abstract begins by stating that stroke is a major health problem in Saudi Arabia, and that its burden is increasing. The authors then note that there is a paucity of data on the epidemiology of stroke in the country.
The motivation for the study was to provide an up-to-date overview of the burden of stroke in Saudi Arabia. The authors used a variety of methods to collect data, including a review of the literature, analysis of hospital records, and a nationwide survey.
The study found that stroke is a major cause of death and disability in Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of stroke is high, and the incidence is increasing. The risk factors for stroke in Saudi Arabia are similar to those in other countries, including hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia.
The authors conclude that stroke is a major public health problem in Saudi Arabia. They call for further research on the epidemiology of stroke in the country, as well as for the development and implementation of effective prevention and treatment strategies.
What theoretical foundation was identified in the research?
The research paper is based on the theoretical foundation of social determinants of health. This theory posits that the social and economic conditions in which people live have a significant impact on their health.
The authors argue that the high burden of stroke in Saudi Arabia is due to a number of social determinants of health, including:
Rapid urbanization: Saudi Arabia has experienced rapid urbanization in recent decades. This has led to changes in lifestyle and diet, which have increased the risk of stroke.
High prevalence of chronic diseases: Chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia are highly prevalent in Saudi Arabia. These diseases are major risk factors for stroke.
Inequities in healthcare access: There are inequities in healthcare access in Saudi Arabia. This means that some people have better access to healthcare than others. This can lead to delays in diagnosis and treatment of stroke, which can worsen the outcome.
What is the motivation and scope of the study?
The motivation for the study was to provide an up-to-date overview of the burden of stroke in Saudi Arabia. The authors note that there is a paucity of data on the epidemiology of stroke in the country. This data is essential for developing and implementing effective prevention and treatment strategies.
The scope of the study is broad. The authors used a variety of methods to collect data on the prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of stroke in Saudi Arabia. They also examined the social determinants of health that contribute to the high burden of stroke in the country.
Explain the research methods used.
The authors used a variety of research methods to collect data, including:
Literature review: The authors conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on stroke in Saudi Arabia. This helped them to identify the major gaps in the knowledge base.
Analysis of hospital records: The authors analyzed hospital records to obtain data on the prevalence, incidence, and outcomes of stroke in Saudi Arabia.
Nationwide survey: The authors conducted a nationwide survey to collect data on the risk factors for stroke.
What gaps and implications did the researchers identify?
The researchers identified a number of gaps in the knowledge base on stroke in Saudi Arabia. These gaps include:
Limited data on the epidemiology of stroke: The researchers found that there is limited data on the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for stroke in Saudi Arabia. This data is essential for developing and implementing effective prevention and treatment strategies.
Need for research on the social determinants of health: The researchers found that there is a need for more research on the social determinants of health that contribute to the high burden of stroke in Saudi Arabia. This research could help to identify interventions to reduce the burden of stroke in the country.
The implications of the research are significant. The findings suggest that stroke is a major public health problem in Saudi Arabia. The government needs to invest in research on stroke and develop and implement effective prevention and treatment strategies.
What do the researchers include in the conclusions?
The researchers conclude that stroke is a major public health problem in Saudi Arabia. They call for further research on the epidemiology of stroke in the country, as well as for the development and implementation of effective prevention and treatment strategies.
The researchers also emphasize the importance of addressing the social determinants of health that contribute to the high burden of stroke in Saudi Arabia. This could include interventions to improve access to
1.Abstract:
Summarize the key information presented in the abstract of the research paper. Abstracts typically provide an overview of the study’s objectives, methods, results, and conclusions.
2. Theoretical Foundation:
Identify and discuss any theoretical foundations or frameworks mentioned in the paper. Researchers often draw upon existing theories or models to guide their study.
3. Motivation and Scope:
Explain the motivation behind the study. What problem or issue does it aim to address? What is the scope of the research? Does the paper mention any specific goals or objectives?
4. Research Methods:
Describe the research methods used in the study. This includes the study design (e.g., observational, experimental), data collection methods, sample size, and statistical analysis techniques.
5. Gaps and Implications:
Discuss any gaps or limitations identified by the researchers in their study. Are there areas where further research is needed? What are the implications of their findings for healthcare or related fields?
6. Conclusions:
Summarize the conclusions drawn by the researchers based on their study’s results. What key findings are highlighted in the paper?
7. Ethical Considerations:
Examine how the researchers indicate they have acted ethically while conducting the study. This may include discussions of informed consent, data privacy, and ethical approval.
8. Research Process and Importance:
Explain the research process followed by the authors and its importance in furthering knowledge in the field of healthcare. How does their study contribute to the existing body of research, and what potential implications or applications does it have?
To analyze the research paper effectively, you will need to read the paper in detail, paying close attention to the sections mentioned above. Each of these elements contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the research, its context, and its significance in the field. Be sure to provide specific examples and quotes from the paper to support your analysis.

Discuss whether or not you think hunger is a solvable problem. Support your answer! Based on the Minnesota Semi-starvation Study, what would it take for a homeless person to recuperate from malnutrition? 350 words https://youtu.be/hcjdPE1nDQg?si=OeIvXlr-G5KKgJwr I attached some files about this topic you may want to take a look
ANSWER
Hunger, as a global issue, is a complex and multifaceted problem. While it is a challenging and persistent problem, I firmly believe that it is a solvable one. To support this viewpoint, we need to look at both the underlying causes of hunger and the potential solutions available.
One of the primary causes of hunger is poverty. Millions of people around the world live in poverty, which limits their access to adequate food and nutrition. Solving hunger would require addressing economic disparities and providing opportunities for individuals and communities to break free from the cycle of poverty. Initiatives such as improving education, creating job opportunities, and implementing social safety nets can contribute to poverty reduction and, subsequently, to addressing hunger.
Food waste is another significant contributor to global hunger. A substantial amount of food is wasted at various stages of the supply chain, from production to consumption. If we reduce food waste and improve the efficiency of food distribution systems, we can ensure that existing resources are used more effectively to feed the world’s population.
Furthermore, increasing agricultural productivity and promoting sustainable farming practices can enhance food production and access to nutritious food. Investments in agricultural research, technology, and infrastructure can significantly contribute to food security.
Global collaboration and humanitarian efforts are also vital in addressing hunger. Many organizations and governments are actively working to alleviate hunger and provide food assistance to those in need. Through cooperation and shared resources, we can make significant progress in eradicating hunger.
Regarding the Minnesota Semi-starvation Study, it provides valuable insights into the physical and psychological effects of malnutrition. Recuperating from malnutrition, especially for a homeless person, would require access to a consistent source of balanced nutrition, medical care, and psychological support. Adequate shelter and a supportive environment are also essential. The recovery process would vary based on the severity of malnutrition, overall health, and individual circumstances.
In conclusion, while hunger is a complex issue deeply intertwined with poverty, food distribution, and societal factors, it is solvable with a combination of measures. These measures include poverty reduction, reducing food waste, improving agricultural practices, and global cooperation. Recovery from malnutrition, as demonstrated by the Minnesota Semi-starvation Study, requires a comprehensive approach that addresses physical and psychological needs, emphasizing the importance of access to proper nutrition, medical care, and support.

I need a post that must be at least 300 words in length and includes 1 APA (7th Edition) reference to a source published within the last 5 years and appropriate in-text citations.

Instructions: 1. Read the Class Assignment. 2. Each participant must upload their responses. 3. Responses should be thorough. Class Assignment: Mrs. Wilcox has been diagnosed with a urinary tract infection. She is a non–insulin-dependent diabetic with a history of hypertension. She is ambulatory and lives alone. Mrs. Wilcox is in exam room number five. During your interview with Mrs. Wilcox, she complains of pain upon urination with foul smelling and cloudy colored urine. (Learning Objectives 4, 5) 1.The healthcare provider has ordered a midstream urine specimen for Mrs. Wilcox. What is the reason for ordering this test? 2. How would you explain to Mrs. Wilcox the proper procedure for collecting the midstream urine?