Your introduction should meet the following requirements: Be three paragraphs in length (1-2 page maximum), not including the title or reference pages. Be formatted according to Saudi Electronic University and APA writing guidelines. Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from the scholarly articles you have gathered. Follow APA and Saudi Electronic University writing standards. Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment. You are strongly encouraged to submit all assignments to the TurnItIn Originality Check prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading. Please use a very simple language and simple words,,,, pay attention the grammar and Capitalism letters
Category: Health Care
-
You go on the website typingtest.com take the typing test and achieve 55wpm and
You go on the website typingtest.com take the typing test and achieve 55wpm and take a pic and send it me and that’s it!
-
Improper Informed Consent Leads to Allegation of Negligent Supervision In this i
Improper Informed Consent Leads to Allegation of Negligent Supervision
In this interaction, the involved physicians avoided disclosing important information to the patient during the informed consent process. An informed consent exchange that is not truthful and complete violates standards of medical ethics.
Allegation
Improper performance of a procedure; negligent supervision; improper informed consent
Case File
A 59-year-old female patient was scheduled for burr-hole drainage of a subdural hematoma she had sustained in a fall. The night before the surgery, the patient was evaluated by a neurosurgeon and a third-year neurosurgery resident. The burr-hole procedure was agreed upon, the risks and benefits were discussed with the patient and her husband, and the patient signed an informed consent form.
The next morning the resident brought the patient to the operating room and performed burr-hole drainage of a right subdural hematoma with placement of two subdural drainage catheters. The resident’s supervising neurosurgeon was not in the operating room during the surgery, although he had reviewed the procedure with the resident before the surgery. Postoperatively, the patient had left hemiparesis. A CT scan revealed that the right frontal catheter had entered the right frontal cortex. The attending physician met with the patient and her husband and explained the nature of the complication. The catheters were subsequently removed, and the patient was discharged to a rehabilitation center. She continued to have left-sided weakness, paralysis and pain.
The patient and her husband sued the attending neurosurgeon and the resident, alleging improper performance of the procedure, negligent supervision of a physician in training and improper informed consent. They testified that their understanding was that the attending physician — not the resident — would perform the surgery. Complicating this situation were the facts that the attending physician was listed as the primary surgeon on the operative report, and the resident had never before performed the procedure independently.
Expert reviewers thought that while the decision to perform the burr-hole drainage of the hematoma was proper, the attending physician should have been present during surgery to supervise and assist. They believed the resident’s placement of the drainage catheter into brain tissue caused significant, permanent paralysis. In addition, experts asserted that if the resident had been directly observed and supervised during the procedure, the complication would likely have been prevented. Further, experts believed the informed consent process was flawed because the attending physician’s name, not the resident’s, appeared on the consent form and the patient and her husband testified in depositions that they had expected the attending neurosurgeon to perform the surgery. Because expert reviewers thought the care and informed consent process did not meet the standard and more likely than not caused harm to the patient, the case was settled.
Four Basic Principles of Medical Ethics2
Beneficence — acting for the patient’s good
Nonmaleficence — doing no harm
Autonomy — recognizing the patient’s values and choices
Justice — treating patients fairly
QUESTIONS FOR POST
1. Nonmaleficence is the key ethical principle in this case. Why?
2. What is the definition of INFORMED CONSENT?
3. Based on the consent obtained during this case, why did the informed consent process not meet medical standard? -
In this assignment you will critically review (summarize and evaluate) the ideas
In this assignment you will critically review (summarize and evaluate) the ideas and information of an article. The article: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/tjpr/article/view/207652 Please make sure to address the following points: -Identify the author, the title, the main topic, and the author’s purpose. -How the article relates to other work in the literature. -Identify author’s most important points and main findings. -Highlight the types of evidence or information the author present. -Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the article. Remember, your task as a reviewer is to re-see the author’s work, not to re-tell it..
-
Parents have many questions about immunizations. Often, these questions are dire
Parents have many questions about immunizations. Often, these questions are directed to the Medical Assistant. How would you answer the following questions if asked by a parent? Make sure you put your answers in your own words.
What do immunizations do?
Will my child’s immune system be weaker by relying on a vaccine?
Will the immunization give someone the very disease it’s supposed to prevent?
Why do kids who are healthy, active, and eating well need to be immunized?
Can immunizations cause a bad reaction in my child? -
The mental health challenge is Dementia. Please see attached instructions. Also
The mental health challenge is Dementia. Please see attached instructions. Also attached a copy of the health wheel. Please make the content strong.
-
• Describe and discuss three historical events or current issues that have influ
• Describe and discuss three historical events or current issues that have influenced or are currently influencing the issue that is discussed in the attached article.
• Remember—a Discussion is more than one sentence! Even the best and most succinct writer needs substance to their discussion. Allow yourself to think in real life terms. Put yourself in the position of the politicians, or the insurance companies, or the patient etc! It is not about length of discussion but about content.
• Remember to use APA citation when referring to the information contained in the article. -
Week 2 Project In a Microsoft Word document of 3-4 pages formatted in APA style,
Week 2 Project In a Microsoft Word document of 3-4 pages formatted in APA style, describe the process of forming a team. You have been asked by your nurse manager to establish a scheduling team for your nursing unit. As you begin to think about developing this team how would you begin this process? What steps would you take? What would you need to consider in building this team Assess your strengths and skill gaps as a leader of the team. When selecting members of the team – what specific characteristics/skills would you look for in team members? Knowing the stages of team development, how would you plan your first meeting? What would you need to consider Support your responses with examples and information from library resources, textbook and lectures. On a separate reference page, cite all sources using APA format. Please note that the title and reference pages should not be included in the total page count of your paper.
-
A written paper 3-5 pages choose one of the Seven hanits from Stephen covey, a 3
A written paper 3-5 pages choose one of the Seven hanits from Stephen covey, a 3-5 page paper and a PowerPoint 10-12slides, must have reference page and title page see photo for details
-
Write a five-paragraph paper (approximately 500 words, double-spaced, 12-point f
Write a five-paragraph paper (approximately 500 words, double-spaced, 12-point font) in
which you:
1. Define quality assurance (QA) and quality improvement (QI).
a. Give an example of how each applies to health care.
b. Describe the differences between the two.
2. Based on the information in the textbook, identify the three ways to measure medical
quality and briefly describe the relationships among them.
3. Based on the information in the textbook, identify the three principles of total quality
and define each as they relate to health care.
4. Define quality management (QM).
a. Explain how QA and QI are part of QM.
Use at least one reliable reference in addition to the textbook. Using APA formatting, include
in-text citations and quotations where appropriate.
Your paper should include a separate cover page and reference page in APA format.