Category: Health Care

  • Mentors are trusted advisors that give constructive criticism and provide guidan

    Mentors are trusted advisors that give constructive criticism and provide guidance for you in many areas. You will need to designate a mentor for your capstone course. This mentor will provide advice, guidance, and support for your capstone project and other assignments in this course.
    Identify the mentor you have chosen to help you with your capstone project. Provide your mentor’s name and position or title. How long have you known this person and in what capacity?
    Describe the personal characteristics you admire about this person as a mentor.
    What professional attributes does this person hold that make him/her a good mentor for your capstone course/project?
    Describe your plan for consulting with your mentor and relying on him/her as a source of support during this course.
    Your post should be approximately 150-200 words.

  • Create a Word document and use the sample budget posted under Module 11 Ch12 to

    Create a Word document and use the sample budget posted under Module 11 Ch12 to complete the tasks below (individual assignment):
    Identify who you are as a health care facility (your choice).
    As the Chief Financial Officer of the organization, use the sample budget to generate an 8% cost savings . List the budget items and dollar amounts for the 8% savings.
    Provide reasonable justifications for your decisions in the 8% cost savings.
    Use complete sentences, no bullet points.

  • 1) Why is the healthcare industry perceived as being less proactive than other i

    1) Why is the healthcare industry perceived as being less proactive than other industries in the area of computerized information systems? How can this perception be changed?
    2) How are the concepts of EDI, e-commerce, and e-health interrelated?
    3) What is driving the increased use of computerized care protocols in healthcare?
    4) What is public key infrastructure, and why is it receiving so much attention within the healthcare industry?
    5) Why is strategic planning for information systems important to organizations in today’s healthcare environment? What risks are associated with not having an IS plan?
    6) What is the relationship between strategic information systems planning and the systems development life cycle?
    Note: Regarding Assignment 1, please incorporate “1 or more” external sources for every question answered for full points. (You may use your 2nd book as an external source)
    Minimum 500 words apply to the total minimum number of words for all six questions answered within the assignment. Not necessarily minimum 500 words per question answered within the assignment.

  • GRAMMAR: I WOULD LIKE FOR REVISION ON THE publish. I UPLOAD A publish OF MY WORK. It

    GRAMMAR: I WOULD LIKE FOR REVISION ON THE publish. I UPLOAD A publish OF MY WORK. It is similar to the previous publish just added more to it.
    OTHER: I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE SURE ALL MATERIALS ARE ADDRESS LOCATE DOWN BELOW.
    You must also attach a one-page statement, in a Word Document or PDF format, addressing the following:
    Describe why you have an interest in a career as a physician.
    Describe an obstacle you’ve faced when working towards your academic, career, or personal goals and how you’ve worked to overcome it.
    Describe the lessons you’ve learned through those experiences and how they will help you be successful in your career as a physician.
    Comments from Customer
    PREVIOUS PAPER INSTRUCTIONS (#334145061): https://nmhc.referrals.selectminds.com/jobs/2020-pre-med-undergraduate-intern-program-34584
    (The website with the instruction for the internship Paper/Statement)
    Below I attached some info about myself. You can use.
    Paper need to be well written, articulate, shown how this internship is beneficial and I want it. If need to make up stuff. Just do It. COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS ORDER: Discipline: Medicine/Myself

  • Please write 450 word discussion post reply to the following discussion post. M

    Please write 450 word discussion post reply to the following discussion post. Must have two peer reviewed references AND one biblical integration. . Textbook is: Langabeer, II, J. R. and Helton, J. (2021). Health care operations management (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 978-1-284-19414-2. Instructions for original post is here:
    Why should an operations analysis consider the organization’s strategic objectives? What are common operational metrics utilized by healthcare organizations. How are these metrics developed? Next describe how benchmarks are developed and how they can be useful in calculating results of operational metrics.
    Post you will reply to is here:
    Today, operations analysis in healthcare organizations is greatly influenced by strategic objectives (Langabeer & Helton, 2021). To improve overall organizational results, operations analysis entails reviewing operational procedures. Strategic objectives ensure that operations analysis activities are in line with more general corporate goals by giving them a clear direction and purpose. Because of this connection, healthcare companies may concentrate their analysis on crucial areas that directly advance their strategic goals, leading to more effective and efficient operations.
    The operational success of healthcare institutions is assessed using a range of measures. The efficacy of processes, resource use, and patient outcomes are all evaluated using these metrics, which act as measurable indications of performance (Dabhilkar & Svarts, 2019). Strategic goals, particular operational objectives, business standards, and legal and regulatory requirements are all taken into consideration when choosing operational metrics. Healthcare businesses may find the most applicable and significant metrics to gauge and track the efficiency of their operational processes by taking these aspects into account.
    Several operational factors are covered by common operational metrics used in healthcare companies. For instance, patient wait times are monitored to assess access to care and spot any bottlenecks that can harm results and patient satisfaction (Langabeer & Helton, 2021). Another indicator that sheds light on the effectiveness of resource management, bed management, and care coordination is the length of stay. Scores on patient satisfaction are important determinants of the organization’s level of care, communication, and patient-centeredness. The success of care transitions, infection control procedures, and patient safety measures may be evaluated using readmission rates and rates of hospital-acquired infections. Additionally, staffing ratios like the number of nurses per patient or the number of doctors per patient reveal information about how much work is done, how resources are allocated, and how patients fare.
    Combining qualitative and quantitative methods results in operational metrics (Dabhilkar & Svarts, 2019). To guarantee consistency and accuracy in acquiring pertinent data, healthcare institutions adopt measuring standards and data collection systems. The information required to calculate the metrics is gathered from a variety of sources, including administrative databases, patient questionnaires, and electronic health records. These metrics enable objective evaluation and analysis since they are produced by preset formulae or algorithms that transform raw data into useful performance indicators.
    When assessing the results of operational metrics, benchmarking is required. An organization’s measurements are compared to benchmarks, which are performance standards or reference points, to industry best practices or competitors (Ali & Kannan, 2022). They make it possible for healthcare organizations to find areas for development, performance shortfalls, and achievable targets. Organizations may get insights into their relative performance and make data-driven decisions to optimize processes, allocate resources effectively, and conduct quality improvement projects by comparing their metrics to benchmarks (Ali & Kannan, 2022). Based on accepted industry standards, benchmarks offer useful direction and empower healthcare businesses to pursue excellence in their operations.
    Finally, strategic objectives influence operations analysis by putting a distinct emphasis on areas that support organizational goals (Ali & Kannan, 2022). Healthcare businesses use a variety of operational indicators to evaluate performance while taking strategic goals, market norms, and legal obligations into consideration. By using pre-established measurement methodologies and data-gathering procedures, these metrics are produced. To evaluate operational metric results and discover areas for development, benchmarking is crucial. It allows firms to compare their performance to industry best practices. Healthcare companies may influence positive change and improve their operational effectiveness and efficiency by utilizing benchmarks.
    Deuteronomy 25:15 (English Standard Version Bible, 2001) states, “You shall have a full and just weight; you shall have a full and just measure, that your days may be long in the land that the Lord your God is giving you.” The Bible touches on fairness in measuring that is consistent with the idea of operational metrics in the healthcare industry. Operations metrics are essential for assessing performance and assuring the provision of high-quality treatment in the hospital context. Healthcare operations metrics offer a standardized framework to assess different elements of healthcare operations, such as patient outcomes, resource usage, efficiency, and patient satisfaction, just as the verse encourages the use of a full and just measure. Healthcare organizations can evaluate their performance, determine areas for development, and eventually improve the overall standard using detailed metrics.

    References
    Ali, I., & Kannan, D. (2022). Mapping research on healthcare operations and supply chain management: A topic modeling-based literature review. Annals of Operations Research, 315(1), 29-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04596-5
    Dabhilkar, M., & Svarts, A. (2019). From general to specialty hospitals: operationalizing focus in healthcare operations. Operations Management Research, 12, 94-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-018-0137-8
    English Standard Version Bible. (2001). ESV Online. https://esv.literalword.com/
    Langabeer, II, J. R. & Helton, J. (2021). Health care operations management (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • 8-1 Career Consultation Listen ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen Focus Hide Assignme

    8-1 Career Consultation
    Listen
    ReadSpeaker webReader: Listen
    Focus
    Hide Assignment Information
    Turnitin™
    Turnitin™ enabledThis assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
    Instructions

    In a 30- to 45-minute consultation with a public health professional, learn about their career experience and then share your professional goals. Listen carefully and take note of their advice. For this assignment, you will submit a summary of the conversation within 1–2 pages.
    To complete this assignment, review the module resources on informational interviews and the Career Consultation Guidelines and Rubric PDF document.

    Hide Rubrics
    Rubric Name: Career Consultation Guidelines and Rubric
    Print
    Criteria
    Exemplary
    Proficient
    Needs Improvement
    Not Evident
    Criterion Score
    Meeting Details
    25 points
    Includes information about name and title of the public health professional, time and place of meeting, and specific career goals; contains evidence of extensive prep work
    21.25 points
    Includes information about name and title of the public health professional, time and place of meeting, and career goals; contains evidence of adequate prep work
    13.75 points
    Includes limited information about name and title of the public health professional, time and place of meeting, and career goals
    0 points
    Does not Include scheduled time for the consultation with a public health professional or information about preparation
    Score of Meeting Details,/ 25
    Meeting Results
    25 points
    Includes a detailed summary of conversation and list of resources gained during the meeting or after research on their own
    21.25 points
    Includes an informative summary of the conversation and list of resources suggested by the public health professional, if addressed
    13.75 points
    Includes limited information about the conversation with the public health professional and/or fails to include resources suggested by the public health professional
    0 points
    Does not include details of the conversation
    Score of Meeting Results,/ 25
    Reflection
    25 points
    Provides an insightful summary about what was learned about self during the consultation and discusses next steps in moving career forward with detail, clarity, and insight
    21.25 points
    Provides a detailed and clear summary of what was learned about self during the consultation and discusses next steps in moving career forward
    13.75 points
    Includes limited information about what was learned about self during the consultation or does not discuss next steps in moving career forward
    0 points
    Does not include what was learned about self or career plans
    Score of Reflection,/ 25
    Spelling and Grammar
    25 points
    Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format
    21.25 points
    Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
    13.75 points
    Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of ideas
    0 points
    Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
    Score of Spelling and Grammar,/ 25
    Total
    Score of Career Consultation Guidelines and Rubric,/ 100
    Overall Score
    Points earned out of 100
    86 points minimum
    The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
    Points earned out of 100
    56 points minimum
    The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
    Points earned out of 100
    1 point minimum
    The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.
    Points earned out of 100
    0 points minimum
    The overall submission earned 1 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook.

  • In a 2 page paper, review Funk, Kennedy, & Hefferon (2017) and compare current p

    In a 2 page paper, review Funk, Kennedy, & Hefferon (2017) and compare current perspectives on the costs and benefits of public health. Be sure to include current, credible literature to support your work and properly cite all sources per APA formatting guidelines.
    Funk, C., Kennedy, B., & Hefferon, M. (2017, February 2). Americans’ views about public health and health studies in the news. http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/02/02/americans-views-about-public-health-and-health-studies-in-the-news/.
    I have included the link for the writer to utilize for this assignment.

  • Problem Identification and Description

    Part 1: Problem Identification and Description Identify and describe the problem in clear and concise language. To help you think about what problem you might choose, keep in mind the health or nursing problems of the patient population(s) you currently serve, those you encountered in your clinical courses, or those you plan to work with in the future. Describe the clinical setting. Describe the service area for the clinic and population groups who attend the clinic services. What kinds of problems do you see in the clinic? Give a clear, explicit statement of the problem and target population, as well as the background of the specific problem relative to the clinical setting. Is it broad enough that you can analyze it from many theoretical and conceptual points of view and make suitable plans to address the problem from a number of perspectives? Is it of enough interest to you that you are willing to spend most of the semester thinking about it, assessing all its dimensions, planning in detail how to address it, and designing a detailed intervention and evaluation plan? Describe the significance of the evidence-based project that could be implemented in the selected setting to the nursing profession. Ask yourself why it is important to you. Consider your own clinical interest. Describe clinical observations that point out the knowledge gap, clinical gap, etc. Describe the significant research in the area that has been done that delineates the gap in our knowledge. Your paper should be 3–4 pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages. You must reference a minimum of 3 scholarly sources in your paper. Use current APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources.
    ANSWER
    **Problem Identification and Description**
    **Clinical Setting:**
    The clinical setting for this evidence-based project is a community health clinic located in an urban area with a diverse population. The clinic primarily serves low-income individuals and families who may not have access to regular healthcare services. The clinic offers a range of primary care services, including preventive care, chronic disease management, and health education programs.
    **Description of the Problem:**
    The problem identified in this clinical setting is the high prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension among the clinic’s patient population. Hypertension, or high blood pressure, is a significant public health issue and a leading cause of cardiovascular diseases, including heart attacks and strokes. The clinic’s patient population faces multiple barriers to accessing consistent healthcare, which contributes to the problem.
    **Background of the Problem:**
    Hypertension is a widespread health concern in the United States, affecting millions of individuals, particularly those from underserved communities. In the clinical setting, it is evident that a substantial number of patients have uncontrolled hypertension, putting them at increased risk of serious health complications.
    **Target Population:**
    The target population for this evidence-based project includes adult patients, aged 18 and above, who visit the community health clinic for primary care services. This population is predominantly low-income and faces socioeconomic challenges that hinder regular access to healthcare and medication adherence.
    **Significance of the Evidence-Based Project:**
    The significance of addressing uncontrolled hypertension in this clinical setting is multifaceted:
    1. **Patient Health:** By improving hypertension management, we can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events and enhance the overall health and well-being of the patient population.
    2. **Healthcare Costs:** Better hypertension control can lead to cost savings in healthcare expenditures by preventing costly hospitalizations and interventions.
    3. **Nursing Profession:** Addressing this problem aligns with the core principles of nursing, emphasizing patient advocacy, health promotion, and disease prevention.
    **Knowledge and Clinical Gap:**
    Clinical observations and data from the clinic indicate that while hypertension is prevalent among patients, there is a gap in knowledge and adherence to treatment plans. Patients often struggle with medication adherence, lifestyle modifications, and regular follow-up appointments.
    **Research and Knowledge Gap:**
    Existing research highlights the importance of controlling hypertension and the effectiveness of various interventions. However, the gap lies in translating this knowledge into practical, patient-centered strategies that address the specific challenges faced by the clinic’s population.
    **Importance to the Nursing Profession:**
    This evidence-based project is important to the nursing profession as it allows nurses to apply their expertise in healthcare delivery and education to make a meaningful impact on patient outcomes. It aligns with the profession’s commitment to improving patient care and reducing health disparities, particularly in underserved communities.
    In summary, the problem of uncontrolled hypertension in the community health clinic is of significant concern due to its impact on patient health, healthcare costs, and the nursing profession’s mission to provide quality care and promote health equity. Addressing this problem through evidence-based interventions will have a lasting and positive effect on the clinic’s patient population.

  • After reading the attached 1. Identify 3 important takeaways 2. What are your th

    After reading the attached
    1. Identify 3 important takeaways
    2. What are your thoughts about how negative behaviors impact a safe work culture?
    3. How can you apply the study’s results to your future profession as a nurse?

  • Examine one (specific) portion of the code provided by ACHE.org. Describe one (s

    Examine one (specific) portion of the code provided by ACHE.org.
    Describe one (specific) portion of the code used by a health professional you select.
    Cite the portion of the ACHE and health professional code but do not quote them. Use your own words.
    Comment on how the two codes may differ in nature. Compare and contrast.
    Do you anticipate any circumstances or situations that will require resolution? Will the current pandemic, unequal distribution of health services, or biotech advances that may emerge in the years to come?
    What will help to resolve a dilemma?