Category: Health & Medical

Write atleast 500 words-Off-Label Prescription of Pscotrophic Medication to children and adolescents

The purpose of this assignment is to recognize the complex hierarchy and levels of systems and apply practical and innovative systems thinking approaches to improve a public health issue. For this assignment, you will examine the relationship between governmental and nongovernmental entities in addressing health concerns.
INSTRUCTIONS
Begin by reviewing the Healthy People website. On the site, select one of the leading health indicators (LHI) that are being addressed in your community.
Next, analyze how this issue is being addressed in your community by both governmental and nongovernmental entities.
In your analysis, do the following:
Identify and summarize the leading health indicator and public health issue you chose, explaining what makes it a public health issue and supporting your argument with data.
Analyze the system-level barriers to program implementation and success for a public health intervention. How do existing policies promote or impede health outcomes?
Describe a system-level intervention you would like to put in place to address the issue. What policies could improve health outcomes? What systemic changes would be needed to support those policies?
Evaluate the role cultural values and practices play in the success or failure of interventions.
Identify the potential participants in an interprofessional team who might be involved in the intervention that you propose.
Analyze how the interprofessional team might be involved in the intervention and why the team is important.
Create a Causal Loop Diagram as a visual aid that demonstrates the system-level complexities of your intervention.
Review the scoring guide before developing and submitting your assignment to ensure you meet all evaluation criteria.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Written communication is free from errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Your paper should demonstrate the current APA style and formatting.
Number of resources: Include a minimum of three resources, appropriately cited throughout your paper and in your reference list.
Suggested length: Three typed and double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference list.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.

Isn’t it likely that instructors and mentors in the health professions will pass along their biases to the next generation of care providers, thereby perpetuating unequal treatment?” (Tobin-Tyler & Teitelbaum, 2019, p. 23).
Background
As Public Health professionals, and taking under consideration that biases extend beyond race, discuss in a short paper explain how implicit biases and discrimination could be a factor and how we, as health professionals can break this cycle of unequal treatment. Begin with describing an experience or citing an example from a scenario where unequal treatment took place.
Paper Guidelines:
• Word count is 550 – 650 (not including reference list)
• Refer to the grading rubric and adhere to the Guidelines for this assignment.
• Besides your textbook, use other references from the library offers online services!)
• Use APA 7th Edition for formatting as required in the social sciences in writing and reference list.
• Cite sources within the body of your paper using APA format.
• Include a Reference list at the end of your paper
• Use Grammarly (FREE!), as an option for reviewing grammar, spelling and more for writing assistance
• Write in Third Person (for info see this Wiki: How to Write in Third Person)

For this assignment, use the Project Charter Template to complete the following items found in Part 2:
Executive or Organizational Project Sponsor: Select a project executive sponsor and explain why you choose this person. The project sponsor holds an authority position in the organization and ensures the project aligns with organizational mission and strategy. This person is the liaison with executive leadership/management. This person is not involved in the day-to-day work of the team but should be aware of the team’s progress. This person takes responsibility for the success (or failure) of the project at the organizational level. You may identify the executive sponsor by title or role. When selecting the executive or organizational sponsor, consider the following to explain why you selected this person:Identify this person by role and title. Provide a fictional name or use initials (please do not use a person’s real name or other identifying information).
Explain why you selected this person, including factors such as:Executive level accountability for success or failure.
Access to support and resources.
The ability to address resistance and challenges.
Creates conditions for success.
Select the Team: Identify 4–6 team members for the Project Charter. Think about who is familiar with the different parts of the systems. The team should consist of the people who are involved with the practice change and carrying out the effort. Some people may have expertise in several areas. Think about the people who are most important to the project, then complete the following:Describe each team member’s title, department or affiliation.Think about who is familiar with the different parts of the systems.
As you consider team members, prioritize them in terms of “must have.” Explain how the person contributes to the project’s success/rational for inclusion.The team should consist of the people who are involved with the practice change and carrying out the effort.
Some people may have expertise in several areas.
Explain how the person will add to the team and/or project’s success.Consider how a diverse set of individuals (demographics, disciplines, experiences, knowledge) will add to the team and/or project’s success.
Select Your Team Leader: After reviewing the Applying Leadership Styles interactive media activity, consider the leadership styles and organizational role most appropriate to drive your project. Then describe a real or fictitious leader who reflects this style and their primary role in the organization. Include the following to demonstrate why this leader is best suited to drive your project:Identify the team leader by initials or fictitious name and primary role within the organization.
Describe two leadership styles appropriate to the project that the leader might utilize.Present 1–2 sources (published within the last five years) to support your discussion of these leadership styles. Include APA-style citations.
Explain why these two leadership approaches are important to your project’s success.
Provide examples of how the leader might apply these leadership approaches in practice.
Describe useful qualities this leader might leverage for success.Consider emotional intelligence and communication/collaboration attributes.
Consider proficiency with practices related to diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Key Stakeholders: Identify 3-4 key stakeholders for the project. Stakeholders have a vested interest in the planned change and represent a wide variety of people and organizations, e.g., patients/clients, family members, policy makers, advocacy groups, providers, community resources, health promotion organizations, nonprofit groups, etc. Use fictional names or initials when identifying stakeholders, and include the following when identifying key stakeholders for your Project Charter:Who is the targeted population?
What is the stakeholder’s connection to the project?
How is the stakeholder affected or impacted by the project?
What is the stakeholder’s contribution to the project? Communication Plan: Develop a communication plan for the executive sponsor, stakeholders, and team members. Consider the “audience,” and different needs according to culture, language, and other factors. Include information related to the following: The purpose of the communication.
The methods of communication employed (e.g., who is the audience, type of communication needed for team members versus stakeholders, sponsor, etc.).
Potential challenges and assets:Cultural competency.
Implicit bias.
Different levels of knowledge, experience, disciplines, roles. Representation.
Diversity and inclusion.
Cite literature to support best practices related to communication and collaboration within diverse teams (1–2 sources, published within the last five years, using the APA format).
Additional RequirementsWritten communication: Write clearly, accurately, and professionally, incorporating sources appropriately.
Length of paper: Complete all fields of Project Charter Template Part 2 (approximately 2–4 pages when complete).
Resources: Include sources where appropriate within the template; each part of the Project Charter must include its own reference page formatted according to the most recent APA style.
Font and font size: APA format (7th edition) permits Times Roman (12-point), Arial (11-point), and Calibri (11-point).

Complete the activity mentioned in the interactive presentation covering Self-Concept and watch the video, where you complete the phrase “I am…..” (Video is embedded into the 2.1 Activities page; you can also view it at:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-h_fJFQcds&feature=emb_imp_woyt Links to an external site.) If you’re willing, share what you wrote down to complete this phrase. Explain whether you fit into the Independent/Individualistic category or the Interdependent/Collectivist category.
Do you think we are a “stranger to ourselves”? In other words, when we are asked to analyze ourselves, we can never fully tell the truth, because there are certain factors about ourselves or our relationships that we can’t verbalize. Thus, we talk about the more superficial aspects of ourselves. Along those same lines, does social media help you represent yourself authentically, or is it a superficial representation of who you are? In this way, does social media make us a “stranger to ourselves”? Give an example to explain your answer.
Think of a difficult decision you or someone you know has made in the past year. In what ways was the hindsight bias used to justify the decision?
In your discussion post, pose one question to the class based off the readings or any other materials in the module.
EvaluationBe sure to review the discussion rubric before composing your post and replies. Click the three dots in the upper right corner to view the rubric.

Select one health-related behavior and complete module 2 Mind mapping slide (last slide in the file):

Learning Goal: I’m working on a film writing question and need a sample publish to help me learn.
2 pages, double-spaced. Times New Roman, 12-pt font.
Historically, it has been taken for granted by most human societies that the world, beyond humanity itself, is alive and aware. Indeed, most societies (but not our contemporary global capitalist one) have taken for granted that humanity and the world exist in a symbiotic relationship that entails obligation, reciprocity, and care.
Author Paul Kingsworth has argued that, “The notion that the non-human world is largely inanimate is often represented as scientific or rational, but it is really more like a modern superstition.” Science, itself, has come to demonstrate recently that plants and mycelium and minerals, not only communicate with each other, but also demonstrate cooperation and care, often in ways that directly challenge Darwinian notions of competition as the key to survival. Further, the reciprocity between plants, mycelium, and minerals begins to trouble, at a granular level, easy distinctions between which beings can be categorized as “living” and which can be categorized as “non-living.”
In an effort to awaken our minds to the non-human beings around us, you will visit the same plant, mineral, or body of water each day for three days in a row. Contemplate this non-human being and sit with it for at least 10 minutes each time. Write about your experiences. Pay attention to the times of day: are you visiting at the same time of day? If not, how does the quality of the light and the temperature of the air affect your experience? Do you notice the being affecting you in any way? What did you come to understand about this being as a result of this practice? What did you come to understand about your relation to it

Situational Case Study: The Crowded Clinic
Course Objectives for Assignment: Discuss potential ways to improve scheduling patient visits at a community health center
Discuss the importance of getting to know the traditions, behaviors, and beliefs of the populations that visit the health center
List at least three ways to make health care more accessible and equitable for a diverse population
Instructions:
Read the following Case Study and respond to the 4 discussion questions at the end. Each response should be 2-3 paragraphs in length. Include a separate page for any references you utilize (APA format). The Case:
You are one of the health care practitioners in a community health center that provides primary care to a multi-ethnic, multi-lingual urban community. Many, but not all, of the patients live below the poverty line. Physicians and nurses see a large volume of patients with challenging medical and psycho-social issues. Lately you have realized that the scheduling of patient visits has become something of a nightmare. Because of the high volume of patients, the wait for an appointment for routine care can be anywhere from six to eight months or more. Even acutely ill patients often wait for two to three days to see a health care provider. Out of frustration, many patients are walking in without appointments, often during lunch hour or late in the afternoon when everyone is getting ready to leave. What makes the problem so challenging is that 20 to 40 percent of patients fail to show up for appointments on a given day. Because of this high no-show rate, every other appointment on physicians’ schedules is double-booked with the expectation that, out of the 30 to 35 scheduled patients, only 20 to 25 will actually show up. Occasionally, however, most of the patients do show up – and when a significant number of acutely ill patients also arrive, the work environment becomes unbearably chaotic for everyone. Providers become harried and more likely to make mistakes, patients wait for long periods of time in crowded waiting rooms, and the atmosphere becomes increasingly hostile as the stress level mounts.
It is clear that the quality and experience of health care for many of these patients is suffering partly because of a simple lack of access to care. And it is also becoming increasingly clear that the better-insured and English-speaking patients may be getting better access: they are more likely to get a timely appointment because they are more demanding of the system, and they are more likely to keep and show up for their appointments because of better communication. You are interested in finding a way to promote more equitable access to health care. Case Analysis:
The main problem that everyone is experiencing in this clinic is the high rate of no-shows. It would be very easy to simply label the clinic’s patients “non-compliant.” But is it so? As health care providers, the burden is on us to find the most effective ways to serve our patient population. One possible approach to the problem at hand is to conduct a survey in an attempt to identify some specific reasons that may be contributing to such a high percentage of no-shows. When patients are surveyed about their reasons for not coming to appointments, a few common reasons may emerge:
A sick patient waited so long to be seen that she got better and didn’t need the visit – or got worse and had to go to the emergency room.
A patient did not have a phone, or his phone number changed, so he never received the reminder message the day before the appointment.
A patient showed up for the appointment, but at the wrong date or time. He misunderstood because of a language barrier. A patient was afraid to take time off work and risk losing her job. It would have been much easier for her to make an evening or weekend appointment. How should you address this flurry of concerns? You can begin by clearing away the backlog of appointments. One possible solution is a system called Open Access. This system allows patients to schedule appointments, even for routine well care, on the same day – usually with their own physicians. This approach has cascading benefits. For instance, if visits are scheduled on the same day, there’s no need to make phone call reminders, eliminating the problem of patients’ not having phones or not receiving the messages. Further, if patients can choose a convenient time to visit (including evening and weekend hours when they are more likely to be off from work), they eliminate the risk of losing their jobs.
There are a number of ways to get this clinic, currently swamped, to a point where it offers Open Access. This work is not easy and the transition period is often quite challenging. Physicians can provide more services during each visit (even if it means that the visits are somewhat longer), reducing the need for the patients to return. The staff can also spend a set period of time — perhaps four to eight weeks – working through the backlog of patients and opening up the schedule for same-day appointments. This may lead to a significant patient overload, so there may be a need for overtime work and creative staffing until the backlog is cleared out (i.e., staff lunches may be staggered so that appointments are available at lunchtime). The hope is that patients will receive timely care, that they will be more likely to be seen by their own doctors instead of the most available physician, and that they will be more likely to avoid going to the emergency room for issues that can easily be handled in an outpatient clinic setting. In addition to making appointment schedules more conducive to patient needs, other ways to serve patients better involve creating an environment more welcoming to the patients and more inclusive of the various cultures, languages, and issues of the various patient populations. There need to be some staff members who can speak the main languages of the patients and who are representative of the diversity of the patients. There should be efforts to educate staff members about the various cultural beliefs of different patient populations. If patients perceive that they can trust the staff and be open with them, they are more likely to comply with the treatment regimens and to make follow-up appointments. Thus, their medical problems are more likely to be successfully diagnosed and managed.
Respond to the following questions in 2-3 paragraphs each. Be sure to cite any references that you utilize appropriately (APA format).
Discussion Questions:
As mentioned above, one aspect of patient-centered care is fostering a culturally sensitive and diverse clinic environment that makes patients feel more welcome. Discuss 3-4 methods in which this may be accomplished?
In order to provide good care for a culturally diverse patient population, it is important to gain some understanding of their ways of being (their belief systems, their traditions, their feelings towards western medicine, etc.). Share your thoughts on a particular patient population that may have unique beliefs about health and illness that would be important to understand? How well do providers know their patients? Can you think of a patient population (a culture, ethnicity, religious group, sexual orientation) with which you do not have much familiarity? How might this lack of knowledge impact the provision of care?
What are some ways in which providers could be better educated in regards to the beliefs and traditions of the patient population? How might this intervention benefit the patients?
https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/dam/course-con…
https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/dam/course-con…

Q2.Assessment Description
Using the condition you posted about in DQ 1 this week, provide a SOAP note using the format outlined below. Support your summary and recommendations plan with a minimum of two APRN-approved scholarly resources. You may not select a condition or disorder that has already been profiled by another learner; you must select a different one.
Subjective
CC (Chief complaint)
HPT (History of present illness)
History (Pertinent medical, surgical, social, medications, exposure, family history, allergies, vaccines)
ROS (Review of systems)
Objective
Vital signs/BMI
Physical exam findings
Diagnostic results (include actual “results” or “findings” that you would expect for a certain scenario)
Assessment/Plan
Differential list and rationale for final/working diagnosis
Problem list
Plan for Each Problem
Based on evidence with proper references
Further diagnostic testing you would order
Nonpharmacologic therapy
Pharmacologic therapy, including specific medication dose
Frequency and duration of therapy
Patient education
Follow-up
PEDIATRIC AML

Your final project should assemble all of your responses for each part of the project into one coherent body of work. Your final project should be in an essay format that should be between 9-10 pages long with references (at least 5 references).
Part 1
To start building your paper, please identify three processes at your internship site (Catholic Charities) that enhance patient care, health care delivery, or health care management. These can be policies, daily routines, even informal things that you find happening at your site that improves patient care.
Part 2:
Of the processes described in Part 1, select one and elaborate on what need caused it to develop. Does this process effectively enhance health care delivery at your site?
Part 3:
Focusing on the one process you isolated in the last part of the final project, how could the process described be improved? How would you attempt to change policy?
Part 4:
Based on your previous answer, describe how you would educate others in the health care environment on the policy change you would like to make.
Part 5:
The final question to reflect on for your semester project and identify cultural and practical barriers to implementing your plan.