Category: Nursing homework help

Think about a client with schizophrenia that you know about from personal, work or clinical experience, or from news media or other sources. Describe the individual.
What are the positive and/or negative symptoms?
What are the person’s struggles? What treatments have been tried and failed? What works?
If you were that person, what would you like to tell your nurse about yourself, your needs, and your fears?

After reading chapters 4,5, 6,7 , Identify leaders you admire. List why and then relate those reasons to the RL attributes in this chapter. Do they fit into one or more of the relationship-based theories? Do their behaviors influence followers? How?

how can I determine failure to respond? For this assignment, I must review the “Failure to Respond” journal article and ascertain an understanding of the current trends in Nursing Education and Practice regarding entry-level preparation and transition into practice.

In this discussion, we’ll talk about the nurse-client relationship and the use of therapeutic communication as an important part of that relationship. Please answer the following questions:
What are your concerns or fears about mental health nursing in general? Are you interested in mental health nursing, or do you approach the topic with some anxiety?
What do you feel are essential aspects of a good nurse-client relationship?
Please include an example of how you established good rapport and a good professional relationship with a patient in the work or clinical setting. What nonverbal and verbal techniques did you use in this relationship?

Identify some of the social, ethical, and economic reasons for addressing immigration policy reform.
400 words
APA
2 references within 5 years
Country USA

Briefly introduce a person you have recently cared for in your nursing practice. (Be sure not to include any identifying information that would be protected by HIPAA!) Discuss the person’s view of the cause of their health condition, the person’s health literacy, and the person’s identity on the continuum of privilege-disadvantage (Table 4 in the Lor article on p. 361). What was (or would be) your approach to care for him/her in a culturally competent way?

The term “focus population” refers to those over the age of 65 or those who may be dealing with age-related health issues in a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) study that focuses on the elderly.
In healthcare research and practice, the elderly are a crucial demographic to concentrate on since they have particular healthcare demands and may suffer from chronic illnesses, cognitive and functional decline, and social isolation, among other difficulties. Also, the elderly utilize medical services more often than people of other ages, which may be quite taxing on the healthcare system.
By addressing concerns including fall prevention, chronic illness management, medication management, mental health, and social support, a DNP project that targets the elderly may seek to enhance healthcare outcomes for this group. The project may include developing and putting into practice initiatives that improve the standard of care given to the elderly and their general health and wellbeing (Moody & Pasquale, 2020). Such a project’s ultimate objective would be to encourage healthy aging and improve the standard of living for this significant and vulnerable demographic.
you have identified the population you’re interested in and conducted the preliminary needs assessment for a health issue(s) or unhealthy behaviors. You probably noticed that there is a gap in healthcare and/or population health programs for that population. Describe 1) what is the current gap in clinical practice, public health practice, or in the scientific literature for the selected population and their health issue(s), and 2) what qualitative and/or quantitative measures can shed insight.
Please limit this to 2-3 paragraphs. Remember to cite your work.

This assignment is something particular, you can find the discussion of week 2 attached in case you need it and the criteria discussed in that week are inside parentheses in the question. I also send you the rubric so that you can be guided by what you should do, I have been deducted points for not following the guidelines of the rubric. Thank you
Question: Using the criteria presented in week 2( Making judgement as to whether a theory could be adapted for use in research is very important. Describe the internal and external criticism that is used to evaluate middle range theories.) , critique the theory of Self-Efficacy using the internal and external criticism evaluation process.
Disccusion of week 2:Internal and external criticisms are essential when assessing middle-range theories for their adaptability and appropriateness for research by assessing the theoretical framework’s logical coherence, empirical backing, and real-world significance through these criticisms.
When criticizing internally, the main focus is ensuring that a theory has logical consistency and internal coherence. The assessment of the model involves analyzing its conceptual clarity and precision, logical connections between variables, and underlying theoretical suppositions (Risjord, 2019). One aspect of internal criticism is ensuring that theoretical propositions maintain internal validity by being logically sound and free from contradictions. Scrutinizing conceptual definitions and logical implications of propositions along with internal structure is essential to detect any errors in logic or concept within a theory.
Assessing a theory’s external validity and empirical support is what external criticism does. The examination evaluates the theory’s effectiveness by testing its ability to apply to genuine conditions and explain or foresee events (Im, 2018). External criticism requires an assessment of a theory’s empirical soundness, alignment with current knowledge, and capacity for creating testable predictions (Peterson et al., 2019). Researchers evaluate a theory by considering its consistency with past empirical research and its ability to account for various observations. A lack of empirical backing or failure to account for critical empirical occurrences could make a theory less appropriate for research.
Internal and external criticisms are crucial for a complete evaluation of middle-range theories, as they are interdependent and indispensable. The theory can be guaranteed to be logically consistent and internally valid by engaging in internal criticism. By subjecting theories to external critique, one can verify their empirical validity and relevance to practical situations (Peterson et al., 2019). Determining whether a theory can be adapted for research requires researchers to assess these aspects thoroughly. Inadequate internal coherence or external validity in theories may hinder the development of meaningful and applicable knowledge. To advance scientific understanding, researchers should choose theories with a solid foundation and a high likelihood of contribution. A comprehensive evaluation process can help accomplish this task.

Discuss the safety and effectiveness of alternative and complementary medicine for the treatment of specific illnesses such as cancer, diabetes, and hypertension. Would you have any conflicts/concerns supporting a patient who choose holistic/allopathic medicine?
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

Step 1 Think about a particular community and family within that community that you are familiar with. Reference that community and family in your answers to the following prompts.
Step 2 Answer the following questions in your initial post due Wednesday at 11:59 pm Mountain Time:
Describe the relationship between the family’s definition of health and the community’s definition of health.
Describe the relationship between the family’s concept of health promotion and that of the community. Explain how the family’s concept of health promotion affects the community’s definition of health promotion.
Explain the influence of family beliefs and values on the definition of health and their relationship to health promotion.
Step 3 Read other students’ posts and respond to at least two of them by Friday 11:59pm MT.
In your response to each of your peers, choose at least two things you agree with and explain your opinions. Use your personal experience, if it’s relevant, to support or debate other students’ posts. If differences of opinion occur, debate the issues professionally and provide examples to support your opinion.