Category: Nursing homework help

After reviewing and studying this module’s content, answer the following questions. Be sure to complete all lab activities and attend/watch all live lectures before completing this assignment. All of your answers should be written in your own words, using full sentences, correct terminology, and proper spelling and grammar.
Explain the anatomical concepts associated with the heart. Summarize this module’s key points in 5-6 sentences.
Explain the physiological concepts associated with the heart. Summarize this module’s key points in 5-6 sentences.
How will you apply the concepts you have learned about the heart in real life and in your future career?
Which topic within this module has been the most valuable to your learning experience and why?
Which topic(s) within this module did you struggle to understand and why?
(Optional) Do you have any suggestions for your instructor on how they could help you connect with the difficult topics you’ve noted?

need proof in turnitin
this is the guide for the cohort
https://connect.springerpub.com/highwire_display/entity_view/node/156618/content_details
COHORT DESIGN
Citation:
Study Design:
Level of Evidence:
Introduction/Background Comments/Appraisal
Rationale provided for study
Significance of study provided
Current state of science or evidence clearly articulated
Problem statement or area identified
Research purpose clearly stated
Design Comments/Appraisal
Research question clearly defined and focused
Cohort identified
How was the exposed cohort selected?
Was there clear and defined selection criteria for inclusion of the exposed cohort?
What proportion of eligible subjects were included in exposed cohort?
How was the nonexposed cohort selected?
Was there clear and defined selection criteria for inclusion of the nonexposed cohort?
What proportion of the eligible subjects were included in the nonexposed cohort?
What was the exposure?
Was the exposure specific and measurable?
What was the potential for misclassification of the exposure?
How long was the cohort followed? Was this time period adequate?
Results/Findings Comments/Appraisal
What measures were implemented to reduce attrition? What was the rate of attrition?
Was there a difference in those who were lost to attrition and those who remained in the cohort study?
What were the primary and secondary study outcomes? How were the outcomes measured? Was the measurement valid and reliable?
Any surrogate outcome measures identified? How were the surrogate outcomes measured? Surrogate measurement was valid and reliable?
What was the comparative analysis of the exposed and nonexposed cohort?
Sample size appropriate based on power analysis; rationale for sample size estimation appropriate?
What was the strength of association between the exposure and outcome?
How accurate was the estimate of association between the exposure and outcome (confidence intervals or p-values)?
Bias/Confounders Comments/Appraisal
What was the potential for recall bias? What research strategies were used to reduce recall bias?
Was there potential for selection bias? What strategies were used to reduce selection bias?
Did the researcher identify all potential confounders?
What was the potential for information bias? What strategies were used to reduce information bias?
Was there potential for historical or maturation bias? What strategies were used to reduce historical or maturation bias?
Implications of Findings/Results Comments/Appraisal
What is the potential application of findings to practice?
Were all the clinically important outcomes considered?
How do the study findings fit within the existing state of science and available evidence?
Were the recommendations supported by the study findings?
Strengths Comments/Appraisal
What are the major strengths of the study design?
What are the major weaknesses of the study design?
Limitations Comments/Appraisal
What are the major limitations of the overall study design?
What are the major limitations of the sampling method?
What are the major limitations of the measurement methods?
What are the major limitations of the data management and analysis methods?
Ethical/Legal Comments/Appraisal
Did the research consider human subjects protection?
How were the human subjects rights protected?
Any ethical concerns identified?
Any potential conflicts of interest identified?
Any legal concerns identified?
attached the info the how the cohort should look like , with the info that you have to get it from the pdf.
remember that the way should look like but it is not same because the template change at the end

Benchmark – What Are the Data Saying?
Assessment Description
In this assignment, you will demonstrate understanding of basic statistical tests by performing the appropriate test for the given project data below using SPSS and by reporting the analyzed results.
PLEASE SEE FULL INSTRUCTIONS IN THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT

Following the guidelines of the United States Preventive Service Taskforce (USPSTF), discuss and describe the screening recommendations for the following:
Cervical cancer
Breast cancer
Osteoporosis
Colorectal cancer
Lung cancer
Ovarian cancer
Intimate partner violence (IPV).

Describe your clinical experience for this week.
Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?
Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.
Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.
What did you learn from this week’s clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?
Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.
Submission Instructions:
Post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

Play the Community HealthSim from the CDC’s VetoViolence website.
Explore each of the 4 avenues to prevent and mitigate violence in the community:
Business
Education
Public safety
Health
Write a minimum of 500 words explaining where you chose to put your tokens and why.
Submit your assignment.

Jody Smith, a retired nurse with three adult children and numerous adult grandchildren, lives alone in a small rural area. Her income is limited. Two months ago, she fell and broke her left hip. After surgery for an artificial hip replacement, she was transferred to a rehabilitation center, where she had a left-sided cerebrovascular accident (CA). She was then readmitted to the acute care facility, where she
“has received aggressive therapy for the CVA. Completely paralyzed on her left side, Mrs. Smith has decided that she no longer desires aggressive therapy and frequently asks the staff why she cannot die in peace.
“The rehabilitation is so painful and l’ll never walk again. What’s the use?” Both the doctors and her family are much more optimistic. the orthopedic surgeon is convinced that she will walk again, and the neurologist believes that she will make a full recovery and be able to return home and care for herself.
Both doctors have excluded Mrs. Smith from their conversations, assuring her children that she will be
“as good as new” and ignoring her requests to discontinue anticoagulant and rehabilitative therapy.
While not in a life-threatening condition, Mrs. Smith refuses to cooperate with the physical and occupational therapists and to take her medications. She also refuses to perform simple tasks, relying on staff to meet her activities of daily living.

Write a persuasive format in apa format on this topic. “Ages under 21 should not be allowed to enlist in the United States Army” . below is a thesis of what I have tried to come up with use it to help you or guide you . THESIS Although the army career that enforces discipline and inserts structure, ages under 21years should not be allowed to join because their brain is not fully developed enough to make such a huge commitment, they are more prone to mental health problems and it interrupts with development opportunities.
ANSWER
Title: Ages Under 21 Should Not Be Allowed to Enlist in the United States Army
I. Introduction
The decision to enlist in the United States Army is one of great significance, both for the individual and for the nation. It demands unwavering commitment, discipline, and a deep understanding of the consequences that come with the choice to serve. While the Army undoubtedly offers valuable career opportunities and instills discipline, the question arises: should ages under 21 be allowed to make this life-altering commitment? This paper argues that individuals under the age of 21 should not be permitted to enlist in the United States Army due to the incomplete development of their brains, their heightened susceptibility to mental health issues, and the potential disruption it poses to their personal development opportunities.
II. Incomplete Brain Development
One of the primary reasons to prohibit those under 21 from enlisting in the Army is the incomplete development of their brains. The prefrontal cortex, responsible for decision-making, impulse control, and evaluating long-term consequences, is still maturing during the late teens and early twenties (Steinberg, 2010). This developmental stage makes individuals under 21 more impulsive and less capable of fully comprehending the magnitude of an Army commitment.
III. Increased Susceptibility to Mental Health Problems
Another compelling argument against enlisting under 21 is their heightened vulnerability to mental health problems. The stresses and demands of military service can be overwhelming, leading to an increased risk of mental health issues such as depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Iversen et al., 2011). Younger enlistees may lack the emotional resilience and coping skills necessary to confront these challenges effectively.
IV. Disruption of Development Opportunities
Joining the Army at a very young age can disrupt essential personal development opportunities. It can impede the pursuit of higher education, vocational training, and other career paths. Delaying military service until a later age allows individuals to explore various options and make a more informed decision about their long-term aspirations.
V. Conclusion
In conclusion, while the United States Army provides numerous benefits, including discipline and structure, enlisting individuals under 21 poses significant risks and potential drawbacks. Their incomplete brain development, increased susceptibility to mental health problems, and the interruption of development opportunities argue for prohibiting enlistment for this age group. Ensuring that individuals make such a profound commitment with fully developed faculties and a more mature understanding of the implications is not only in their best interest but also in the best interest of the nation’s armed forces.
References:
Iversen, A. C., van Staden, L., Hughes, J. H., Browne, T., Hull, L., Hall, J., … & Fear, N. T. (2011). The prevalence of common mental disorders and PTSD in the UK military: Using data from a clinical interview-based study. BMC Psychiatry, 11(1), 68.
Steinberg, L. (2010). A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Psychobiology, 52(3), 216-224.

Discuss how professional nursing organizations support the field of nursing and how they advocate for nursing practice. Explain the value professional nursing organizations have in advocacy and activism related to client care.

The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can be used as a framework for a future evidence-based project
Content Requirements:
Review literature regarding issues or concerns within your selected area of advanced practice nursing. Select a theory or model which is relevant to your selected area of advanced practice nursing. Offer a meaningful context for evidence-based practice surrounding the issue or concern which you identified.
Address Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-based Practice Assignment
Identify and describe a theory or model, and explain its relevance to the selected area of advanced practice
Describe an issue or concern regarding the selected area of advanced practice and explain its impact on health care outcomes.
Explain how the theory or model can be used as a framework to guide evidence-based practice to address the issue or concern, and discuss the unique insight or perspective offered through the application of this theory or model.
Submission Instructions:
The PowerPoint presentation is original work and logically organized. It should consist of 10-15 slides excluding the title and reference.
The PowerPoint presentation should be clear and easy to read. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.
The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)
Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).