Category: Nursing

4 pages, excluding the tittle page and reference page.
Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria:
1. Discuss the budgetary process
a. Types of budgets
b. Budgeting measures
2. Discuss health-care reimbursement
a. Medicare and Medicaid
b. Prospective payment systems
c. Managed care
3. Include cost containment and the role of the nurse
a. Balancing cost and quality of care
4. Discuss Health-Care Reform and the Affordable Care Act
a. Bundled payments
b. Hospital Value-Based Purchasing
c. Health Insurance Marketplaces
5. The scholarly paper should
a. 4 to 6 pages, excluding the title and reference page.
b. Include an introductory paragraph, purpose statement, and a conclusion.
c. Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the paper.
d. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify: I, we, you, me, our is not used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used.
e. Include a minimum of three (2) peer-reviewed scholarly journal references to support the paper (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old.
f. APA format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations).

In your reflection, address the following in a Microsoft Word document:
Describe three things you learned about this population that surprised you.
Describe three things you could do with this population to be more culturally sensitive in practice.
Use APA (7th edition) format for in-text citations and at least two scholarly references, preferably from provider-based or NP-based journals.

Appraising a published literature – Induction of Labor….
You may use a scoping, systematic, integrative or critical literature review article for this assignment.
Use one of the six Guidelines for Critically Appraising Literature Reviews from Polit & Beck’s Box 6.1 posted below.
Include a stable link to the literature review article that you are appraising.
Box 6.1 Guidelines for Critically Appraising Literature Reviews
1. Does the review seem thorough and up-to-date? Did it include major studies on the topic? Did it include recent research?
2. Did the review rely mainly on research reports, using primary sources?
3. Did the review critically appraise and compare key studies? Did it identify important gaps in the literature?
4. Was the review well organized? Is the development of ideas clear?
5. Did the review use appropriate language, suggesting the tentativeness of prior findings? Is the review objective?
6: Deleted
7. If the review was designed to summarize evidence for clinical practice, did it draw appropriate conclusions about practice implications?

Part A:
video:
After watching the video, address the first question based on your thoughts and supported by research. Include with your post the research references in APA (American Psychological Association) style format.
Question: Do you think the government should mandate childhood vaccinations? Do you think parents have the right to refuse it? Why?
Part B:
topic:lymphatic system and immunity
create and post TWO separate well-crafted and well-researched questions for your classmates to answer. Each question must include at least 5 sentences of background information before your classmate questions are asked.
***Please be sure to research your questions and add references in APA style.

The purpose of the case study is for you to expand on the pathophysiological disease process by searching for evidence-based practice treatment and advanced practice nursing role implications related to the disease.
Part 1:
Compare and contrast the 3 conditions in one of the charts below: PAIN SYNDROME
Migraine Headaches Tension Headaches Meningitis Risk Factors Pathophysiology Clinical Manifestations OR
NEUROLOGIC SYNDROME
Dementia Depression Anxiety
Risk Factors Pathophysiology Clinical Manifestations Part 2:
Choose a pain or neurologic syndrome to explore. You can also choose a diagnosis not listed (that coincides with your advanced practice specialty) as long as it relates to the neurological function.
Present a hypothetical case that includes the following:
Vital information about a person who might be predisposed to this condition (I.e., a person who may have risk factors for this condition). The pathophysiology of the disease, including clinical manifestations.
Which diagnostic tests you’d recommend and a rationale for the one(s) you choose.
How this condition compares to other differentials.
The evidence-based recommendations from the AHRQ GuidelinesLinks to an external site. or guidelines recommended from a professional organization. Based on these recommendations, discuss how to manage the condition best.
A patient safety issue that could be associated with the condition presented in this case.
Part 3:
Answer these reflection questions:
What information would a master’s prepared nurse gather from a patient with this condition?
How could the master’s prepared nurse use this information to design a patient education session for someone with this condition?
What was the most confusing or challenging information presented in this case?
Expectations: Your paper should be 3–4 pages (excluding cover and reference pages).
Use medical terminology and appropriate graduate level writing.
Your resources must include research articles and reference to non-research evidence-based AHRQ Guidelines.Links to an external site.
Use APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources. Your source(s) should be integrated into the paragraphs. Use internal citations pointing to evidence in the literature and supporting your ideas. You will need to include a reference page listing those sources. Cite a minimum of three resources.
Review the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded.
Rubric
NURS_530_DE – Case Study Rubric
NURS_530_DE – Case Study Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
20 to >17.4 ptsMeets Expectations
Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers detailed and specific examples for all questions. Makes keen observations, making note of essential information provided in the case. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions.
17.4 to >15.0 ptsApproaching Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers some detail and some examples for most questions. Makes occasional note of essential information provided in the case. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions.
15 to >11.8 ptsFalls Slightly Below Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations of significant concepts. Offers little or insignificant detail and no examples for most questions. Fails to address essential information provided in the case. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusion.
11.8 to >0 ptsNot Meeting Expectations
Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20 to >17.4 ptsMeets Expectations
Makes insightful, clear and accurate connections to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a comprehensive, high-level understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
17.4 to >15.0 ptsApproaching Expectations
Makes mostly accurate connections to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a general understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
15 to >11.8 ptsFalls Slightly Below Expectations
Provides several insufficient or inaccurate explanations, although attempts are made to address some key concepts. Response indicates an introductory understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
11.8 to >0 ptsNot Meeting Expectations
Information is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates little or no understanding of the concepts presented in the case.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
8 to >6.96 ptsMeets Expectations
Answers are well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.
6.96 to >6.0 ptsApproaching Expectations
Answers are well written throughout and the information is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.
6 to >4.72 ptsFalls Slightly Below Expectations
Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors.
4.72 to >0 ptsNot Meeting Expectations
Answers are not well written and lack clarity. Information is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
2 to >1.74 ptsMeets Expectations
Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.
1.74 to >1.5 ptsApproaching Expectations
Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout.
1.5 to >1.18 ptsFalls Slightly Below Expectations
Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.
1.18 to >0 ptsNot Meeting Expectations
Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements.
2 pts
Total Points: 50

Quite often, nurse leaders are faced with ethical dilemmas, such as those associated with choices between competing needs and limited resources. Resources are finite, and competition for those resources occurs daily in all organizations.
For example, the use of 12-hour shifts has been a strategy to retain nurses. However, evidence suggests that as nurses work more hours in a shift, they commit more errors. How do effective leaders find a balance between the needs of the organization and the needs of ensuring quality, effective, and safe patient care?
Write an explanation of how competing needs, such as the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients, may impact the development of policy. Then, describe any specific competing needs that may impact the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected. What are the impacts, and how might policy address these competing needs? Be specific and provide examples.

Power and Politics
PROMPT
Access the Web – Search “Power and Politics in the Work Place”. Review 3 informational articles. Look for strategies and tactics that can enhance or decrease the opportunity for goal attainment. Summarize key points from articles you recommend as reading to peers. Include the link in the Reference List. Provide exemplars within the summaries. Limit 500 words for all three summaries.
Initial post: Summarize key points from the three articles that you recommend as reading to peers. Include the link if available for easy access to peers. The word limit for Discussion Boards is 500 words. For this DB assignment, the Limit of 500 words applies to all three summaries. References may come from your own selected articles, additional articles, or text.

Instruction
Topic: Hospice and Palliative Care
a. All sections completed (must be present)
b. Includes at least four (4) interventions
c. References the textbook
d. References a scholarly resource
I have the same topic with the sample paper. Make sure it is not the same job do not copy the paper to avoid plagiarism and the scholar articles most be completely different.
Book:
Title: Community/Public Health Nursing
Promoting the Health of Populations
Authors: Nies, M. A., & McEwen, M.
Publisher: Saunders
Copyright: 2019

Consider the principles of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
Reflect on your experiences, observations, and/or clinical practices from the last 5 years and think about how pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors altered his or her anticipated response to a drug.
Consider factors that might have influenced the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes, such as genetics (including pharmacogenetics), gender, ethnicity, age, behavior, and/or possible pathophysiological changes due to disease.
Think about a personalized plan of care based on these influencing factors and patient history in your case study.
the patient case from your experiences, observations, and/or clinical practice from the last 5 years. Then, describe factors that might have influenced pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes of the patient you identified. Finally, explain details of the personalized plan of care that you would develop based on influencing factors and patient history in your case. Be specific and provide examples.
The patient is 65 yrs old ESRD, Diabetic, CHF, HTN and High cholesterol
African American

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this.
After working with your preceptor to assess organizational policies, create a list of measurable outcomes for your capstone project intervention. Write a list of five outcomes for your proposed intervention. Below each outcome, provide a three sentence rationale. My capstone topic is fall prevention among elderly patient in the hospital.
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool
Please be sure to include in-text citations
Please be sure to use sources that are credible or scholarly
Requirements: Write a list of five outcomes for your proposed intervention. Below each outcome, provide a three sentence rationale.