Category: Pharmacology

Guidelines:
APA Format
MUST utilize credible data sources such as CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalKey, The Cochrane Library. Library resources can be accessed from the Library page at the FNU.edu website. FNU Librarians are available to assist each student with retrieving the required scholarly content.
Research paper must be 500 – 650 words.
3 or more scholarly sources must be utilized
Sources must be within the last 5 years
Must have a minimum of 3 Sources
All article sources must be cited by including them in reference sheet (separate).

Topic: Cholinergic drugs & their blockers
13 page’s
Important these points
-Evaluation criteria:
– Mastery of content
-Originality/student contribution
-Organisation of content
Instructions: The assignment is about cholinergic drugs and blockers. Introduction, Classification with examples, Mechanism of action
Pharmacological actions, Therapeutic uses and Adverse effects, References should be included.
Please note that assigments should be strictly PPT,PDF or Word.
Assignments will be checked for plagiarism and those above 20% plagiarism will suffer mark deduction.
I will upload file as example its another top ..this homwork should be like this way

The lab pass for the Focused Exam: UTI with Antibiotic Sensitivity module
The lab pass for the Anti-infective Concept Lab
A Microsoft Word document containing the following information:
A synopsis of the Shadow Health assignment (21 year old with abdominal pain from UTI, generally healthy with allergies to penicillin was seen, educated and prescribed nitrofurantoin and pyridium. She was reminded to not rely on cranberry juice or pill for UTI)
A reflection on your work for this assignment, answering the following questions:
What did you learn? assessment in a virtual environment
How did the assignment help you apply the principles of prescribing antibacterial medications? (explain how prescribing antibiotics in a virtual sims lab will help)
The synopsis/reflection document must be at least one page in length, not including the title and reference pages, and must be written in current APA format

The objective of this Assignment is to write about a current regulatory topic of interest – you may choose either a US-centric or globally oriented topic. Potential topics for the paper may include description of a case history or an ongoing topic of interest in healthcare that details international regulatory agency collaboration on a specific issue in regulatory affairs. You may choose FDA as one of the regulatory agencies in the international collaboration. The paper should also discuss in detail how these international regulatory agencies collaborated with each other as well as with the World Health Organization (WHO).
For instance, you may choose to discuss a healthcare related topic including, but not limited to the current COVID-19 pandemic, or the more recent Ebola virus outbreak, and discuss how the WHO collaborated with other global healthcare agencies on case management, prevention and control of the infection. In this scenario, the paper should detail how international regulatory agencies collaborated with each other as well as with WHO in the development of new diagnostic tests, vaccines or therapies to combat the disease/condition and help accelerate approvals for the same for quick patient access while ensuring they are safe and effective.
You may also choose to refer to but are not limited to the following websites/documents as background information for the paper.
 https://www.who.int/about
 https://ww w.who.int /health-topics/
 https://www.who.int/emergencies/en/
 https://www.fda. gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/emergency-situations-medical-devices
 https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/authorisation -procedures
 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/… 2302X 1 630 0638
 https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-useauthorization#abouteuas
Format of the Paper:
– 8 to 10 pages long submitted as a Word document (excluding bibliography, graphs, tables, and other visual images)
– Times New Roman font, size 12, single-spacing
– 1’’ margins
– Sub-headings may be used for clarity
– Accurate, complete, and properly formatted bibliography per APA -No Plagiarism

The advanced practice nurse is updating the plan of care of nursing home patients with hypertension.
Briefly describe the therapeutic actions of drugs affecting blood pressure (diuretics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, CCB, sympathetic nervous system drugs).
What important teaching points should be addressed for patients receiving antihypertensive drugs?
Please use updated resources and cite throughout text. Thank you. 500 word minimum.

For your assignments, please use the following case study:
LM is an 86-year-old female admitted to the emergency department with delirium. Her spouse is with her and verifies that LM adheres to the medications she is currently prescribed. She does not self-monitor her BP or heart rate at home.
PMH:
A Fib diagnosed 1 month ago
HTN x 10 years
CKD x 5 years
Osteoarthritis x 7 years
GERD x 20 years
Medications: Digoxin 0.25 mg QD
Metoprolol XL 25mg QD
Warfarin 3 mg QD
APAP 650 mg TID
Omeprazole 20mg QD
Multivitamin QD
Allergies: NKDA
Social History:
Married to husband for 57 years
No smoking, alcohol, limited daily exercise (short walks each morning)
Family History:
None reported
Vitals: Labs:
Wt 113 lbs Ht 5’4” Na+ 138 K+ 4.0
BP 101/58, HR 52 Cl- 99 CO2 27
BUN 33 Cr 1.2
Gluc 109 INR 3.8
Dig 2.4
PE:
Elderly female with altered level of consciousness, no signs of bruising, bleeding, or other injury.
Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:
Explain how the factor you selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient from the case study you were assigned.
Describe how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy. Be specific and provide examples.
Explain how you might improve the patient’s drug therapy plan and explain why you would make these recommended improvements.
NURS_6521_Week2_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_6521_Week2_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how the factor you selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient from the case study you were assigned.
25 to >22.5 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and completely explains in detail how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.
22.5 to >19.75 pts
Good
The response provides a basic explanation of how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.
19.75 to >17.25 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient.
17.25 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the factor selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient, or is missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy. Be specific and provide examples.
30 to >26.7 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and completely describes in detail how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy. … Accurate, complete, and aligned examples are provided to support the response.
26.7 to >23.7 pts
Good
The response accurately describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy. … Accurate examples may be provided to support the response.
23.7 to >20.7 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy. … Inaccurate or vague examples are provided to support the response.
20.7 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy, or is missing. … Inaccurate and vague examples may be provided to support the response, or is missing.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how you might improve the patient’s drug therapy plan, and explain why you would make these recommended improvements.
30 to >26.7 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how to improve the patient’s drug therapy plan. … The response includes an accurate and detailed explanation to support the recommended improvements.
26.7 to >23.7 pts
Good
The response accurately explains how to improve the patient’s drug therapy plan. … The response may include an accurate explanation to support the recommended improvements.
23.7 to >20.7 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how to improve the patient’s drug therapy plan. … The response may include an inaccurate, vague, or misaligned explanation to support the recommended improvements.
20.7 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how to improve the patient’s drug therapy plan, or is missing. … The response may include an inaccurate and vague explanation to support the recommended improvements, or is missing.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.45 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4.45 to >3.95 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3.95 to >3.45 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
3.45 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.45 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
4.45 to >3.95 pts
Good
Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3.95 to >3.45 pts
Fair
Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3.45 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.45 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors
4.45 to >3.95 pts
Good
Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors
3.95 to >3.45 pts
Fair
Contains several (3–4) APA format errors
3.45 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors
5 pts
Total Points: 100

I have already done the assignment but I rushed through it so I want you to fix it/rewrite it by looking at the marking scheme and the 3 examples I provided. Go through the references and see if they are appropriate and are “reliable” under the universities criteria.
The original assignment instructions:
We covered understanding and leading people in the healthcare unit. Reflect on your learning about this topic, and what you will do with your learning from the workshops and write up your reflection using the attached form. A few things to note:
• I have attached the marking criteria for your reference
• I have also attached some example assignments, with the marks and feedback they would have been given. Please note that the choice of topics for these examples is arbitrary and for illustrative purposes only
• The word limit, excluding your reference list, is 750 words