Category: Psychology homework help

Discussing the research methods, comparing the difference between quantitative and qualitative focus, and describing the relevance of the mixes focus.

Employee evaluations are a part of most organizations. Complete the following for this assignment:
Discuss a time that you were evaluated on the job, in a classroom, and so forth, and discuss what method was used for your evaluation.
Do you believe that the evaluation was accurate or biased through one of the common rating errors (leniency, central tendency, strictness, halo, proximity, contrast, or recency)?
How can effective employee evaluations determine a route to transformational change within an organization?
Discuss how employee evaluations for current employees will factor into the change plan.

In the following video, Hannah Fry discusses the basic elements of the mathematical theory and her tips for finding love. Can a healthy marriage be predicted? Can a divorce be predicted? What are the components of a successful marriage? Explain.

EVALUATING PURPOSE STATEMENTS
“There is a link between understanding the purpose of one’s research and selecting the appropriate methods to investigate the questions that are derived from that purpose. ”
–(Newman, Ridenour, Newman, & DeMarco, G. M. P., Jr., 2003, p. 169)
For this Discussion, you will evaluate the purpose statements in assigned journal articles in your discipline and consider the alignment of theory, problem, and purpose. You will also explain your position on the relationship between research and social change.
Alignment means that a research study possesses clear and logical connections among all of its various components. To achieve these connections, researchers must carefully craft the components of their study such that when they are viewed together, there is a coherent interrelationship.
As you read the authors’ purpose statements, consider how well the intent of the study, and its connection to the problem and theoretical framework, is presented. Also consider if the purpose statement reveals the study’s potential for engendering positive social change.
As you know, social change is a distinguishing feature of Walden University’s mission. Positive social change implies a transformation that results in positive outcomes. This can happen at many levels (e.g., individual, family systems, neighborhoods, organizations, nationally and globally); and positive social change can occur at different rates: slow and gradual or fast and radical.
With these thoughts in mind, refer to the Journal Articles document for your assigned articles for this Discussion. You will switch your journal article assignment from Week 3. If your last name starts with A through L, use Article B. If your last name starts with M through Z, use Article A. Follow the prompt below for your program.
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCE
PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATE (EDD) STUDENTS
BY DAY 4
Post a critique of the research study in which you:
Evaluate the purpose statement.
The Purpose Statement Checklist serves as a guide for your evaluation. Please do not respond to the checklist in a Yes/No format in writing your Discussion post.
Analyze alignment among the theory, research problem, and purpose.
Explain your position on the relationship between research and social change.
Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.
RESOURCES

Babbie, E. (2017). Basics of social research (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Chapter 4, “Research Design”

Burkholder, G. J., Cox, K. A., Crawford, L. M., & Hitchcock, J. H. (Eds.). (2020). Research designs and methods: An applied guide for the scholar-practitioner. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Chapter 20, “Writing the Research Proposal”

Document: Journal Articles (Word Document)Download Journal Articles (Word Document)
For the Discussion, download this document, refer to the assigned journal articles for your program, and find these articles in the Walden Library.
Document: Purpose Statement Checklist (PDF)Download Purpose Statement Checklist (PDF)
This checklist serves as a guide for your evaluation. Please do not respond to the checklist in a Yes/No format in writing your Discussion post.

Compare task groups versus educational, support, or skills groups.
Describe a type of treatment group you would facilitate as a social worker.
Explain what professional role you may take when facilitating this group.
Describe what is meant by group norms, and explain how you would help shape these norms based on your role in the group.
Explain what is meant by group roles. Identify at least one group role, and explain why a group member may take that role.
Describe a group member role that might be most challenging to you as a group leader, and explain why.

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts (on different days), in one or more of the following ways:
Suggest additional criteria you can use to determine whether an article is peer reviewed or not.
Describe a situation in which using a resource that is not peer reviewed might be acceptable.
Although there is no specific word count required for responses to colleagues, a good follow-up response can typically be expressed in 100–200 words. Responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a fresh viewpoint and be constructive, enhancing the learning for all students.

To prepare:
Review the family systems therapy video from this week’s Learning Resources. Take note of language and techniques used by the counselor that is specific to this theory.
Review the Psychoanalytic Case Conceptualization Example found in this week’s Learning Resources and use this document to prepare your initial Discussion post.
Select one of the case studies presented in this week’s Learning Resources, and answer the following points as if you were a family counselor. Use your Learning Resources and the notes you took on language and technique from the family systems therapy video to support your conceptualization and integrate examples from the case to support your post. Include the following:

Presenting Problem
Hypothesis
Treatment Goals
Identification and explanation of at least two techniques and interventions
Expected Outcome

Post your family conceptualization.
Case of: MIKE
References
Dykeman, C. (2022). Family theory. In D. Capuzzi & M. D. Stauffer (Eds.), Counseling and psychotherapy: Theories and interventions (7th ed., pp. 287-308). American Counseling Association.
https://waldenu.kanopy.com/en/waldenu/watch/video/94940
other resources to consider or include:

When you have a strong grasp of the basic tenets, strengths, and weaknesses of key theories of psychology, you can make an informed decision as to which theory or theories best apply in understanding a particular set of behaviors. By keeping a journal of sorts, you can document the characteristics of each theory as you learn about it. Your journaling will be a useful reference for you long after you complete this course. The Psychology Theories Template provides a matrix where you can record what you have learned about each theory.
For this Assignment, you will explore key concepts found in psychodynamic theories and begin your journaling of this week’s theories.

Begin populating the Psychology Theories Template related to this week’s theories—psychodynamic theories. As you begin populating your template, consider the following:
Identify who or what contributed to the development of the theory. Were there key researchers or seminal research that led to the theory?
Record whether the theory emphasizes nature (biology), nurture (environment), or both.
List the primary characteristics or features of the theory (its key tenets and concepts). Be sure to include if a particular period of life is emphasized.
List the noteworthy strengths and weaknesses of the theory.
(Optional) Include any notes that you find helpful in understanding and applying the theory, such as potential contemporary themes or fields of research in which the theory could be applied.

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts (on different days) by addressing the following questions:
How might you use the information presented by your colleague to guide and inform your professional decision-making within a forensic psychology context?
What is an unanswered question that you have related to your colleagues’ post?
Note: Your responses to colleagues should be substantial (200–300 words) and supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources and properly cited in APA style. Personal anecdotes are acceptable within meaningful responses but cannot stand alone as a response. Responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a fresh viewpoint and be constructive, enhancing the learning for all students.

an explanation of the high-risk behaviors that D is exhibiting. Describe the theoretical approaches and practice skills you would employ in working with D. How might familial relationships influence D’s mood and behavior? will attach