Using the psychosocial theoretical concepts of life stages, examine your own life activities, behaviors, and things you are learning during each period of your life.
Give a summary of your life situations in each of Erikson’s stages. How do your experiences compare to Erikson’s life stage assumptions? Explain.
What role have environment and culture played in shaping your behavior and activities, values, and views of those with differing backgrounds?
Discuss how Erikson’s life stage theory is useful to the helping professional. If you do not believe his life stage theory is useful then explain your opinion.
Your paperrr should follow the template of Erikson’s life stages. Use at least four peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles in addition to the course text. This paperrrr should be six to eight pagesss in APA format.
Category: Psychology homework help
-
How do your experiences compare to Erikson’s life stage assumptions?
-
Why are smaller p-values indicative of stronger evidence against the null hypothesis?
Nice start! As we are discussing probability this week, I’d like to follow up on your statement that “More grounded proof against the null hypothesis is shown by smaller p-values.” Why are smaller p-values indicative of stronger evidence against the null hypothesis? That is, what does the p value represent in terms of probability?
ANSWER
The p-value represents the probability of obtaining the observed results, or more extreme results, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. A smaller p-value means that it is less likely to obtain the observed results if the null hypothesis is true. Therefore, smaller p-values are indicative of stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.Another way to think about it is that the p-value is a measure of the compatibility of the observed data with the null hypothesis. A smaller p-value means that the observed data is less compatible with the null hypothesis.
Here is an example:
Suppose we are conducting a hypothesis test to determine whether a new drug is effective in treating a certain disease. The null hypothesis is that the drug is not effective. We conduct a clinical trial and find that the drug is significantly more effective than the placebo. This means that the p-value is very small.
The small p-value indicates that it is very unlikely to obtain the observed results if the null hypothesis is true. Therefore, we can conclude that there is strong evidence against the null hypothesis and that the drug is effective.
It is important to note that the p-value is not the same as the probability that the null hypothesis is true. The p-value only tells us how likely it is to obtain the observed results if the null hypothesis is true. It does not tell us whether the null hypothesis is actually true or false.
To decide whether to reject the null hypothesis, we need to consider the p-value and the significance level. The significance level is the maximum p-value that we are willing to tolerate before rejecting the null hypothesis. It is typically set to 0.05.
If the p-value is less than the significance level, then we reject the null hypothesis. This means that we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and that the alternative hypothesis is more likely to be true.
If the p-value is greater than the significance level, then we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means that we do not have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and that the alternative hypothesis is not more likely to be true.
-
a. Discuss the primary defining features of the Gestalt approach. b. Describe
a. Discuss the primary defining features of the Gestalt approach.
b. Describe some of the core techniques in this form of therapy.
c. What are the strengths and limitations of this approach?
References needed -
Chapter 7 discusses intelligence. Using the book and outside research, complet
Chapter 7 discusses intelligence. Using the book and outside research, complete the following tasks.
Define intelligence. Do you agree with the definition? Why or why not? Look at the theories of intelligence in the book and decide which you think is the most accurate. Use outside research to support your opinion.
This assignment is between 2-3 pages. You will need to have outside research and APA citations -
What do recent findings about the interaction of psychosocial factors with brain
What do recent findings about the interaction of psychosocial factors with brain structure and function indicate regarding future research directions in abnormal psychology?
-
The textbook discusses the different stages of the life cycle. Discuss how diffi
The textbook discusses the different stages of the life cycle. Discuss how difficult it is to determine when each stage begins and ends, using biological, cognitive, and psychosocial criteria. Contrast this discontinuity perspective with the continuity perspective. Which perspective do you favor?