Category: Psychology homework help

Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on the new information presented in this book. It is meant to increase your awareness and critical thinking about the experience and treatment of common psychological disorders in the US and around the world.
Reading to Critically Evaluate
Please read Chapter 4 in Crazy Like Us: The Globalization of the American Psyche by Ethan Watters.
You are encouraged to ask questions of the reading as you read, make notes of areas of confusion, surprise or disagreement, and mention this in this assignment!
Directions
Write two paragraphs (minimum of 200 words) in which you identify Watter’s main thesis of the chapter and discuss your overall thoughts and reactions to the main thesis.
Write a one-paragraph response (minimum of 100 words) to ONE of the following questions listed below.
Include two quotes from the chapter that stood out to you. Include the page number or time stamp where your quotes can be found.
Questions (choose only one)
1. What questions form in your mind when you learn that most of the influential studies on SSRIs were ghostwritten by private firms hired by drug companies?
2. Did you find it difficult to grasp the idea that the Japanese did not always connect suicide with depression and in fact viewed it as an expression of the purity of the Japanese character (something to be admired, excused or seen as an act of personal resolve)? Why or why not?
Grading
Full points for the assignment will be earned when all 3 portions of the assignment are met. Two-paragraph (minimum of 200 words) general reaction (6pts), one-paragraph (minimum of 100 words) response to question (2pts), two quotes with page numbers/time stamps (2pts). Check out the rubric!

two colleagues by sharing insights gained from their post and explain how you will integrate those insights into your own biopsychosocial assessment. You may also provide suggestions or resources to address a challenge your colleague has identified.

To prepare:
Review the Learning Resources this week to deepen your understanding of the Depravity Standard and classifying crimes by severity of depravity.
Review the “About the Research” page of the Depravity Standard website, then complete the Depravity Survey located on the “Take the Survey” page.
Note: To complete the survey, you must enter your email address.
Consider the ways in which crime depravity has changed over time and your views on sentencing in relation to depravity.
Post your response to the following questions:
In what ways has crime evolved over time?
Should sentencing of offenders be based on the relative depravity of their crime? Explain your rationale.
What are potential problems in collecting and/or incorporating depravity findings in sentencing laws?
Note: Your post should be substantial (1 paragraph or more for each bullet point above), supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA style.
ANSWER
**In what ways has crime evolved over time?**
Crime has evolved over time in a number of ways. First, the types of crimes that are committed have changed. For example, in the past, crimes such as robbery and burglary were more common, but today, crimes such as cybercrime and identity theft are more common. Second, the methods used to commit crimes have changed. For example, in the past, criminals typically used physical force to commit crimes, but today, criminals often use technology to commit crimes. Third, the motivations for crime have changed. For example, in the past, criminals were often motivated by financial gain, but today, criminals are often motivated by other factors, such as revenge or thrill-seeking.
**Should sentencing of offenders be based on the relative depravity of their crime?**
There are strong arguments to be made on both sides of this issue.
**Arguments in favor of basing sentencing on depravity:**
* **Depravity is a measure of the harm that a crime causes to victims and society.** Crimes that are more depraved are more harmful and therefore deserve more severe punishment.
* **Basing sentencing on depravity can help to deter criminals from committing heinous crimes.** Criminals are more likely to be deterred from committing crimes if they know that they will receive a severe punishment if they are caught.
* **Basing sentencing on depravity can help to ensure that justice is served for victims and their families.** Victims and their families deserve to know that the criminal who harmed them has been punished appropriately.
**Arguments against basing sentencing on depravity:**
* **Depravity is a subjective measure.** What one person considers to be a depraved crime, another person may not. This can lead to inconsistencies in sentencing.
* **Basing sentencing on depravity can lead to longer prison sentences for some offenders.** This can have a number of negative consequences, such as increased recidivism rates and higher costs for taxpayers.
* **Basing sentencing on depravity can give the government too much power.** The government could use this power to punish offenders for their beliefs or lifestyles, rather than for their crimes.
**My rationale for basing sentencing on depravity:**
I believe that sentencing should be based on the relative depravity of the crime. This is because I believe that the harm that a crime causes to victims and society should be the primary factor in determining the severity of the punishment. Crimes that are more depraved are more harmful and therefore deserve more severe punishment.
However, I also believe that there are some potential problems with collecting and/or incorporating depravity findings in sentencing laws. One problem is that depravity is a subjective measure. What one person considers to be a depraved crime, another person may not. This can lead to inconsistencies in sentencing. Another problem is that basing sentencing on depravity can lead to longer prison sentences for some offenders. This can have a number of negative consequences, such as increased recidivism rates and higher costs for taxpayers.
I believe that these problems can be addressed by developing clear and objective criteria for determining depravity. These criteria should be based on factors such as the severity of the physical and emotional harm caused to the victim, the level of planning and premeditation involved in the crime, and the offender’s level of remorse.
I also believe that sentencing should be individualized. This means that the judge should consider all of the relevant factors in a case, including the offender’s personal history, the circumstances of the crime, and the potential for rehabilitation. This will help to ensure that justice is served for all parties involved.
**Potential problems in collecting and/or incorporating depravity findings in sentencing laws:**
* **Difficulty in defining and measuring depravity.** Depravity is a complex concept that is difficult to define and measure. This can make it difficult to develop objective criteria for determining depravity.
* **Bias in the assessment of depravity.** The assessment of depravity can be subjective and influenced by the personal biases of the assessor. This can lead to disparities in sentencing.
* **Potential for abuse of power.** The government could use the concept of depravity to punish offenders for their beliefs or lifestyles, rather than for their crimes. This could lead to a violation of the offender’s rights.
Overall, I believe that the potential benefits of basing sentencing on depravity outweigh the potential problems. However, it is important to develop clear and objective criteria for determining depravity and to ensure that sentencing is individualized.

Xenophobia is the term used to describe phobia or feelings of rejection of the foreigner and can be linked to racism depending on ethnicity.

In Week 7 of this course, you will be asked to submit an introductory literature review similar to the introduction of the manuscript for a research paper. This will provide a conceptual overview of a topic of your choice (related to learning and motivation), synthesizing for the reader what research has been previously conducted on the topic, what theoretical frameworks have guided this work, what is currently known about the topic and what is not (yet) known. For Week 5 (this week), you will submit an outline of the introductory literature review. It should include in-text citations and references to at least 10 peer-reviewed journal articles that report on original studies that have been conducted (not secondary sources).
Note: *A scholarly journal article has been peer-reviewed. An original research article includes the first-time report of a research study or studies the author(s) conducted, including methodology (participants), results, and discussion. If your article does not have a Methods section, it is not the right type of article for this assignment. If you are not sure about the article you have selected, please ask your professor.
Please note that the outline should not contain roman numerals or alphabet-style labels. Labels will be headings that would be appropriate for the paper. Use paragraph form to describe what you will discuss in each section. Outline examples will be discussed in KL (Week 5). Attend or watch the recording before submitting the assignment.
For the Week 5 outline:
1. First, give a brief overview of what your paper topic is and what you will accomplish in the paper (thesis statement)
2. Use headings to group the major themes (and subthemes) you will cover in the paper. Be specific with your headings and check that they match what you are discussing (with the same level of specificity).
3. Under each heading, give a brief description of what you will discuss in the section and use in-text citations to support the major points you will make. Begin paragraphs with the main point you will make in the section, then use citations to support that point. Note- citations should be integrated into paragraph form to demonstrate what specific points they will support. Citations should NOT simply be listed at end of the paragraph. Demonstrate how the citations support the point(s) you are making. This will help you prepare for synthesis (looking across multiple studies) rather than a simple point-by-point (reporting) approach. Expect to have multiple citations under each heading. If you have a proposed section with only one citation, make a note that you will search/include more in the final paper.
4. Use at least 10 scholarly peer-reviewed empirical articles. You may include more, as 10 is the minimum (not maximum).
5. Be sure to use APA style, including the title page, appropriate grammar, spelling, and mechanics, as well as citations and references.

Instructions:
After studying the module content and suggested resources.
Argue about intersubjectivity in social policies and its influence on the new role of the social worker as an agent of change.
Use Format
You must present your writing double-spaced, in Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.
Include an Introduction, Development of the topic, Arguments for and against, and a Conclusion.
Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).
When citing the work of other authors, including citations and references, use APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

Content Summary attached with instructions
1.5 in length

chapters from this week Read: Chadee: Chapters 4, 7
Read: Kassin, Markus, & Fein: Chapters 3 – 4
articles attached in pdfs
Books Used
Chadee, D. (2022). Theories in social psychology (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 9781119627883.
Kassin, S., Fein, S., & Markus, H. R. (2021). Social psychology (11th ed). Cengage Learning. ISBN: 9780357122846

To prepare:
Review the neurodevelopmental disorders in the DSM-5.
Review the interactive media program “Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Case Study” found in this week’s Learning Resources.
Review the interactive media program “Intellectual and Developmental Disability (IDD): A Case Study” found in this week’s Learning Resources.
Select one of these two neurodevelopmental disorders on which to focus for this Discussion.
Post the following:
Based on the DSM-5 and the scholarly articles found in this week’s Learning Resources, define and explain the neurodevelopmental disorder exemplified in the case study that you selected.
Explain how and why some of the symptoms associated with neurodevelopmental disorders contribute to criminal behavior.
Explain the forensic psychological implications of this neurodevelopmental disorder.
Note: Your posts should be substantial (300–500 words), supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA style. Personal anecdotes are acceptable within meaningful responses but cannot stand alone as a response.

INTRODUCTION
SECTION A: Best Practice in Planning
1. ASGW
2. ACA
3. AMHCA
SECTION B: Best Practices in Performing
1. ASGW
2. ACA
3. AMHC
SECTION C: Best Practices in Group Processing
1. ASGW
2. ACA
3. AMHCA
CONCLUSION (summarize what you learned and how the codes compare/contrast each other)
You do not need to have outside resources for this, your references will be the 3 codes as stated
above. Make sure you use in-text citations next to the sentences where you reference the codes
(e.g., ACA A.9.12). Summarize the codes using your own words

Choose one of the following topics below and address the corresponding questions.Option #1 – Intelligence Test
Base your answers on your observations about the intelligence test you took in the Unit Readings and Activities.
Were the concepts of fluid and/or crystallized intelligence demonstrated through the test you took? Why or why not? Provide examples from the test itself in support of your response.
Did the test measure practical and/or emotional intelligence? If so, how? If not, how did it not measure practical and/or emotional intelligence? Provide examples from the test in support of your response.
Was the test accurate in measuring intelligence, according to Binet? If so, how? If not, how was it not accurate? Provide examples from the test to support your answer.
How might this test have been culturally biased? Conversely, do you feel that it was culture fair? Provide examples from the test that support your perspective.
OROption #2 – Multiple Intelligences
What is meant by Multiple Intelligences?
Take the Multiple Intelligence Inventory and determine which intelligences you score “high” on and which you score “low” on. Are the results consistent with your perception of yourself? Why or why not?
Do you feel the test was culturally fair? Explain.
What applications do the theory of Multiple Intelligences have in educational settings?