Category: Psychology homework help

What is Aristotle’s general conception of prudence, as he describes it in Book VI, Chapters 1-7 ofNicomachean Ethics? How does deliberation and goal-directed action relate to prudence? What is the end to which prudence aims (i.e. what is its goal)? Contrast Aristotle’s general conception of prudence with his general conception of wisdom. Page 86-92

ANSWER
**Aristotle’s General Conception of Prudence**

Prudence (phronesis) is an intellectual virtue that enables us to make good decisions about how to live our lives. It is the ability to deliberate well about what to do and to act in accordance with the best course of action.

Prudence is closely related to goal-directed action. Deliberation is the process of thinking about what to do in order to achieve a particular goal. Prudence involves the ability to deliberate well, which means being able to consider all of the relevant factors and to choose the best course of action.

**The End to Which Prudence Aims**

The end to which prudence aims is eudaimonia, or human flourishing. Eudaimonia is a complex concept, but it can be understood as the state of living a good and fulfilling life. Prudence is necessary for eudaimonia because it helps us to make choices that are conducive to a good life.

**Prudence and Wisdom**

Aristotle distinguishes between prudence and wisdom (sophia). Wisdom is a broader intellectual virtue that encompasses knowledge of all things, including the good and the bad. Prudence, on the other hand, is more narrowly focused on practical knowledge, or knowledge of how to live a good life.

Another way to contrast prudence and wisdom is to say that prudence is concerned with the particular, while wisdom is concerned with the universal. Prudence is about making good decisions in specific situations, while wisdom is about understanding the general principles that govern good living.

**Deliberation and Goal-Directed Action in Relation to Prudence**

Deliberation and goal-directed action are essential components of prudence. Deliberation is the process of thinking about what to do in order to achieve a particular goal. Goal-directed action is the process of carrying out those decisions.

Prudence involves the ability to deliberate well and to act in accordance with the best course of action. This means being able to consider all of the relevant factors, to weigh the pros and cons of different options, and to choose the course of action that is most likely to lead to the desired outcome.

**Example of Prudence**

An example of prudence might be a doctor who is deciding how to treat a patient. The doctor would need to consider all of the relevant factors, such as the patient’s symptoms, medical history, and other treatment options. The doctor would also need to weigh the pros and cons of each option and choose the course of action that is most likely to lead to a good outcome for the patient.

**Conclusion**

Prudence is an essential intellectual virtue for living a good life. It enables us to make good decisions about how to achieve our goals and to live in accordance with our values. Prudence is closely related to deliberation and goal-directed action, and it aims at the end of eudaimonia, or human flourishing.

Instructions:
This activity aims to prepare a written work applying the concepts studied in this module. Go deeper into the topic(s) discussed in the module by answering the following question:
Compare and comment on Hume’s and Nagel’s theories to explain social behavior.
Submission Instructions:
Contribute a minimum of 450 words for your initial post. It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cite in APA.

Compose a comparative article (two-page minimum) discussing the research methods, comparing the difference between quantitative and qualitative focus, and describing the relevance of the mixed focus.
– Be sure to use APA style, include bibliographic citations (the maximum percentage of quoted material allowed is 30%) and references.

Progress: When is it appropriate to use in-depth interviews?
Problems: What are the features, problems, and pitfalls of interviewing?
Plans:

How will you organize your interview?
How will you incorporate the concepts from your theory/model into your interview guide?
What other resources or support will you need to develop a good data collection tool?

How does the scientific method point towards truth? What is truth, and how do you know when you have found it? Access and read the GCU Statement on Integration of Faith and Work. How might a person with the Christian worldview recognize when they have found truth?

Describe the advocacy in which you engaged this term.
Explain how the concepts from this week’s resources apply to the act of advocacy in which you engaged.
Describe potential risks that you considered or that may exist for a social worker who serves as an advocate.

In 250-500 words:
Briefly explain the concepts of anger, stress, and aggression as they relate to violent offenders.
Explain the relationship among anger, stress, and aggression.

View the library tutorial on using the GCU databases and the empirical article tutorial. Find a scholarly peer-reviewed journal from the library. Select a research study (complete with Method, Results, and Discussion sections).
In 750-1,000 words, analyze the article.
List the research question(s)/hypothesis being considered in the article.
Summarize the study being conducted, including the purpose of the study.
Describe the method and design used to test the research question(s)/hypothesis, including:

Discuss if you believe the method and design was the correct method and design for the study. If not, what would your suggestion for method and design be?
Describe the variables, how were they defined and operationalized?

4. Discuss if the study is ethically sound. Why or why not. What elements are present, or lacking, to show it is ethically sound.
Include at least two to four scholarly sources.

Academic level: College
Type: Article review
Subject: Psychology
Topic: A preliminary study of associations between discomfort intolerance, pain severity/interference, and frequency of cannabis use among individuals with chronic pain
Style: APA
Number of pages: 2 pages/double spaced (550 words)
PowerPoint slides: 0
Number of source/references: 2
Extra features: –
Order instructions:
1. Read the article starting with the Title and Abstract, which will give you a quick preview of the purpose and results of the article.
2. Read the Introduction. Highlight the purpose of the article and the author’s hypothesis (e.g., what was studied, what did the author predicted, and why did they find the topic worthy of study). Pay attention to the context provided for the research (i.e., what research has been done previously in the field? what issue or problem is this study trying to address?).
3. ead the Methods section. Note the description of the participants and any tests, surveys, questionnaires, apparatus, or other materials that were used. Pay particular attention to the details involved in the experimental procedure. How were the variables manipulated or measured? Recall that the Independent Variable (IV) is the variable that is manipulated by the research (i.e., whether the room is hot or cold (if that is the variable of interest) or whether participants are given a placebo, shown any type of media or other stimuli, given talk therapy, or instructed to take medication (if that is the variable of interest). Remember that the Independent Variable is what was different about the experiences of the different groups. Recall also that the Dependent Variable (DV) is that variable that is measured, or, the outcome of the study.
4. Read the Results. Try not to get intimidated by complex statistical analysis. Instead of focusing on the numbers, focus on the short descriptions that accompany the findings explaining what the researchers found (i.e., Did the researchers find evidence that supports their hypothesis?)
5. Read the Discussion. Pay special attention here to what the authors say about the importance of their findings or the lack of findings. Think about other things you could do to look at this issue.
6. Prepare a summary of the article fully paraphrased in your own words and your own writing style and structure. Changing a few words from the original is not fully paraphrasing. Be sure to address the following questions in your summary:
– What is the purpose of the research? (Address specifics regarding the overall purpose of the research in question.)
– What hypothesis is tested? (Provide a clear statement of the researchers’ prediction.)
– How did the researchers investigate their research question? (Provide details regarding the study methodology.)
– What are the pertinent results of the manipulation? (What were the findings and conclusions drawn?)
– What is your personal opinion of the study conducted? Should it be repeated? What could be improved?
– What is your overall impression of the work? What are the implications of the study?
**Your summary should be written as a coherent essay (do not format as a list of answers to these questions). You may include additional insights in your analysis, but you must address these key issues.
Please provide a titile for your paper. In addition, please use subheadings such as Introduction, Method, Result & Discussion, Personal Statement, References (multiple with minimal two references), etc.

Present one of the chapters out of the Atomic Chef in class using a Power Point presentation
first page is the overview about one chapters
second page is what mistake they did
third page is how can we do to fix it
forth page is the things that connect to class.